Monoculture farming is a form of agriculture that focuses on growing only one crop at a time, allowing farmers to devote all their time, energy, and money to that crop, increasing their yield significantly. This method simplifies the process of applying inputs like fertilizer, herbicide, and irrigation. Monoculture fields can be prepared and sown quickly with farm machines, and precise row widths can permit higher yields of certain crops.
By growing just one crop species in a field at a time, monocultures enable farmers to use machinery, increasing the efficiency of activities like planting and harvesting. Annual cereal crops have higher productivity and are easier to manage when planted. However, monocultures can also have unintended negative consequences on the environment, especially on the soil.
In crop monocultures, each plant in a field has the same standardized planting, maintenance, and harvesting requirements, resulting in greater yields and lower costs. When a crop is matched to its well-managed environment, a monoculture can produce higher yields than a polyculture. By growing just one crop species in a field at a time, monocultures enable farmers to use machinery, increasing the efficiency of activities like planting and harvesting.
Crop rotation can help preserve soil productivity and lessen the need for agricultural chemicals for fertilization and pest control. The use of collembolans and earthworms has been shown to increase plant growth and performance in a complementary way. Under favorable conditions, the productivity of monocultures does not decrease and is even comparable to that of crops grown in crop rotations.
Intercropping, which involves growing two or more crops close together, can improve soil health and control pests, diseases, and weeds. Overall, monoculture farming offers numerous benefits for farmers, including increased productivity, reduced environmental impact, and improved soil health.
📹 Can we create the “perfect” farm? – Brent Loken
Explore the innovative ways countries are revolutionizing farming to ensure we can feed humanity in a way that works with the …
What causes an increase in agricultural productivity?
Productivity in agriculture is influenced by changes in techniques and technology. Key factors include mechanization, high-yield varieties, fertilizers, education in management and entrepreneurial techniques, acid soil liming, irrigation, herbicides, genetic engineering, pesticides, increased plant density, digestible animal feed, and keeping animals indoors in cold weather.
Increasing a region’s farm productivity is crucial for various reasons, including providing more food, affecting growth and competitiveness in the agricultural market, income distribution and savings, and labor migration. An increase in agricultural productivity implies a more efficient distribution of scarce resources. As farmers adopt new techniques and differences, more productive farmers benefit from increased welfare, while those who are not productive enough may seek success elsewhere. Therefore, a region’s agricultural productivity is crucial for growth, competitiveness, income distribution, savings, and labor migration.
How to increase crop production?
Crop yield is a crucial aspect of agriculture, indicating the amount of seeds or grains produced from a given land plot. It is typically expressed in kilograms per hectare or bushels per acre and is considered the most important measure of a farmer’s performance. It represents the result of all the efforts and resources invested by agrarians in the development of plants on their fields. To increase crop yield, farmers can focus on improving seed quality, field productivity zoning, monitoring crop growth, accurate weather prediction, regular scouting, proper irrigation, smart application of fertilizers, and crop protection methods.
The article discusses the factors that affect crop yield and the most efficient and up-to-date solutions and technologies that can help farmers achieve better yields on their fields. The main factors that affect crop yield include the quality of seeds, field productivity zoning, accurate weather prediction, regular scouting, proper irrigation, smart application of fertilizers, and crop protection methods. By addressing these factors, farmers can improve their agricultural output and achieve better crop yields.
What is monoculture in management?
Monoculture refers to the planting and management of a few forest species, sometimes exotic or not, under a uniform forest management regime. It is often argued that monocultures harm biodiversity and natural ecosystem processes in favor of commercial gains from timber optimization. However, this argument is not always valid. If forest investment has legitimate biodiversity and ecosystem services objectives, planting or managing for single or few commercial species can provide multiple forest benefits.
To be legitimate, it is essential to understand the biodiversity and ecosystem services in the forest under management, set targets for protection or improvement, manage for these, and monitor performance. As long as the strategy is not clearing existing forests, converting ecosystems into planted forests with commercial species, or poorly matching commercial species to natural conditions, it is possible to integrate intensively managed commercial plantations with areas managed for biodiversity and ecosystem objectives. This approach can deliver on all commercial, biodiversity, and other ecosystem objectives.
What is the opposite of monoculture?
In contrast to monoculture, which is a non-sustainable agricultural practice, polyculture represents a sustainable approach to crop production. It has the potential to stabilise yields and reduce soil erosion. It enhances soil quality and remains a prevalent practice due to its salutary and environmental advantages. This conventional approach is employed in scientific research and is protected by copyright laws. The utilization of cookies on this website is subject to the terms and conditions set forth by ScienceDirect.
What does monoculture mean?
The term “monoculture” is used to describe the cultivation of a single crop or organism, particularly on agricultural or forest land. It is a form of agricultural production in which a single species of organism is cultivated on a given plot of land, forming a single population. This type of farming practice has the potential to result in a reduction in biodiversity, particularly in terms of plant and bird species, within marsh ecosystems.
What are the factors that affect crop productivity?
Crop production is the process of growing crops for domestic and commercial purposes, including rice, wheat, maize, and jute. Factors affecting crop production include water, wind, sunlight, temperature, rainfall, photosynthesis, microbes, soil fertility, and pollinating agents. These factors help farmers grow and produce crops for food and fiber, making it a common agricultural practice worldwide.
Which of these are main factors that affect productivity?
The communication culture within an organization significantly impacts employee productivity levels. Factors such as leadership, technology, health and well-being, training and development, workplace environment, motivation and incentives, and goal setting play a crucial role in maintaining high employee productivity. However, maintaining high productivity is a constant challenge due to the lack of a playbook for motivating employees and increasing efficiency. Strategic communication practices, selecting the right technology, and incorporating health and wellness are essential for boosting productivity.
What enhances crop productivity?
Nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium are essential plant nutrients deficient in Indian soil. To achieve maximum crop yield, biofertilizers and irrigation practices are essential. Biofertilizers enhance soil nutrients, while irrigation helps maintain soil richness. Both are equally important for high crop yield. However, irrigation and biofertilizer use are independent, and the reason does not explain the assertion. Both methods are crucial for maintaining soil health and maximizing crop yield.
What does it mean to be monocultural?
Monoculturalism is the policy or process of supporting or allowing the expression of a single social or ethnic group’s culture. It often stems from beliefs within the dominant group that their cultural practices are superior to those of minority groups. It is often related to ethnocentrism, which involves judging another culture based on one’s own values and standards. Monoculturalism may also involve the process of assimilation, where other ethnic groups are expected to adopt the culture and practices of the dominant ethnic group.
In the context of cultural diversity, it is the opposite of multiculturalism. Sometimes, monoculturalism manifests as the active preservation of a country’s national culture by exclusion of external influences, such as Japan, South Korea, and North Korea. It is often closely associated with ethnocentrism, which is the practice of framing one’s way of life as natural and valid and applying that belief system to interpret the characteristics of other cultures.
What is the strategy of monoculture?
Farmers can maximize their profit by mass producing the same species on a large land area through unique practices like planting, maintaining, and harvesting with similar resources. This leads to greater yields at a lower cost. ScienceDirect uses cookies and all rights are reserved for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. Open access content is licensed under Creative Commons terms.
What is an example of a monoculture globalization?
Monoculturalism is the active preservation of a country’s national culture by excluding external influences, often seen in countries like Japan, South Korea, and North Korea. This form of monoculturalism can also result from factors like geographic isolation, historical racial homogeneity, or political isolation. It is often linked to ethnocentrism, which frames one’s way of life as natural and valid, and applies that belief system to interpret the characteristics of other cultures.
Many genocides throughout history were based on ethnic supremacy, as seen in Rwanda, where European intervention socially constructed an ethnic inferiority, distinguishing Hutus and Tutsis, leading to one of the most horrific demonstrations of genocide in modern history.
📹 Why Farming Is Broken (And Always Has Been)
To learn more, start your googling with these keywords: Annual plant: living for a year or less, perpetuating itself by seed …
I absolutely love article’s like this thank goodness we have the internet this is how we solve problems by sharing methods and looking for solutions… to help our world … this is amazing we waste so much food less is better we can do this more answers will come out of this we can get it right! Wow this is amazing.. there are so many amazing people in our world! Thank you we can’t drop the the ball… such exciting times! Yeah!!!! Thank you thank you thank you!
Energy, food and transportation are becoming more alarming problems than we thought . It’s so nice to hear that humans are trying to adopt a new method in order to solve these overwhelming matters. In the future, we will get more people adapt to this approach ; they will know that it’s their mission to save the planet
It’s realy very interesting and productive than our classroom lectures, and provide more information in less time and is very helpful when we get confused anywhere in our teaching profession. I use to watch your article regularly .It gives me a lot of ideas.and clear all confusions withi few minutes. Thank u sir ji…🤗🤗
As a farmer most of what is in the article I agree with. I’m not sure how realistic perennial crops are. When the same crop is grown consistently on the same land year after year, Soil borne diseases become more prevalent like ‘take all’ which is a risk when the crop is taking the same nutrients out of the soil year after year.
It is very interesting to see how farming affects soils over the long term. I took a college course in soils a few years ago, and although tilling soil works well for crops in the short term, it denudes the land and makes it unusable in the future. Additions of phosphorous, nitrogen, and other chemicals for plant growth temporarily makes the land usable again, but these resources like you said are non-renewable. Hopefully modern farming practices can be improved before another dust-bowl level disaster occurs! Planting crops that supply nutrients along with the ones that deplete the soil is a step in the right direction (such as planting legumes that replenish nitrogen in the soil).
So many issues with this article and the ideas it proposes I could write a PhD thesis on it, but I will try to be brief and address the biggest ones. our premise at 0:20 that farming is still basically the same as 10,000 years ago is very flawed. A couple of the main differences are crop rotation and no-tillage farming practices. Also, one important consideration to make is that less than 2 percent of the United States’ population is directly involved in agriculture, and this number is decreasing. Any changes to agriculture will have to make the entire process less labor intensive.
I dont know if this applies, but I come from a village that is historically settled by apple farmers, and they have consistently planted other crops between their apple trees, replacing the crops every year but not changing the Apple trees. Is this is in any way remotely related to the multi-crop farming you guys are talking about?
The informational part of this article ends at 2:19, it’s only at 2:25 when a different guy finally announces this is a sponsored article. I am betting a lot of people paused and left the article before that point. That means a lot of people saw you endorse their product without realizing they were seeing an ad. I don’t appreciate that, and I don’t think the FTC would either. They don’t specifically disallow disclosing at the end, but they don’t like it. I will quote from the FTC website ( goo.gl/QBvPVf ) “(Q:) (…) When in the review should I make the disclosure? Is it ok if it’s at the end? (A:) It’s more likely that a disclosure at the end of the article will be missed, especially if someone doesn’t watch the whole thing. (…)” In other parts it also states that the proximity of the disclosure to the content is an important consideration. Also, for people who’ll say “it’s in the description”, in the same link the FTC clearly states that that’s not enough (though it’s certainly not a bad addition). Now here is the thing, I know you didn’t do it for any nefarious purpose, so could you please just after the “This is Kate from MinuteEarth” add “and this article is sponsored by the Land Institute” or better yet “and this is a paid promotion by the Land Institute” because it is. Okay, thanks.
Many places here in Germany also have the problem of monocultures. Near my uncle’s place in Brandenburg there is almost only Corn, Year after Year, aft Year. It’s because they have many Bio Gas plants, so they use Corn to make Biomass. My dad is a farmer and said that you have to change the type of crop on the field every one to three years.
Interesting, but with some huge flaws, errors and so. Main problem is that you can not have different plants on same field at same time as it would require manual or somehow mechanized sorting that would be too expensive. Recycling could be somehow done, but you would have to focus on sewage water management and whether bilge is processed correctly and changed into kind of fertilizer, as well you would have to change waste processing system, separating organic and other waste. It is almost impossible. You have completely forgot that there is huge push for hydroponics and you have ignored fact that population should peak somewhere around 9 billion and then fall. I assume that this peak could be earlier. Problems with water is that governments focus only on large dams while construction of millions (maybe too much :)) small ponds that would even by dry for most of year would greatly help with replenishing of round water. Same goes for canalisation of rivers. They have to be allowed to act freely in strip depending on their size this would greatly increase area where water can soak into the ground. As suggested in comments, permaculture can help, but only when people will start their own gardens, or when highly automated gardens will arrive. I would avoid using GMO unless they are used in controlled bioreactors for purposes that otherwise would require complex chemistry or inhumane measures or would not be possible at all. In other words, they are great for pharmaceutical industry, we can one day use them for artificial blood, but we should not use them for, e.
The problem I see here is that implementing perennial crops would decrease efficency on the short term and thus, decreasing profits, so big agricultural companies won’t allow this type of implementation until the effects of not having to repeat the farming cycle translates to money efficency :/ CRISP and gene editing is our best shot in the near future, but first we have to fight the medieval mindset of the average person who still believes (because they are being told) that GMOs are bad.
They should really do more research and talk to more actual farmers and not the internet. Farmers are already doing things to help all of these problems. That’s why they are farmers and minute earth makes youtube articles… For an educational website I constantly feel they are pushing another agenda then just educating..
I have question around the Neolithic revolution. The gradual change is that the original hunter gatherer discover that seeds will grow to plants when you plant it, so they start doing it in a tiny scale,which is horticulture.( they still hunt and gatherer ) The hunter and gatherer wouldn’t need to farm BEFORE the invention of Agriculture (small scale or big scale, doesn’t matter ) Since all the hunter gatherer population wouldn’t grow big enough to require to farm . Plus they will not have the technology and knowledge to know HOW to farm or farm in a PRODUCTIVE scale . Also they are not instinctively good or interested in farming . First of all, the original hunter and gatherer will not spend any time to remain horticulture due to Horticulture : 1)risky 2) they don’t have technology and requirements to do so All types of pest original hunter gatherer need to manage : From mammals to insects. From virus,fungi,Bactria parasites . From other weed . From other human of different tribes ) Think about how much knowledge and technology the horticulture hunter gatherer need to achieve to turn into successful productive scale of agriculture. Did they see the future of horticulture will lead to civilization? Second Why do they REMAIN horticulture if it’s not meaningful in that time
“Farming is broken, even though it’s gone on for 10,000 years and things are fine. But lets experiment with new and untested ideas that could be hazardous.” Ecosystems have limited productivity and can easily be broken and replaced – this is because nature is dynamic and adaptable and flexible, unlike human systems (organic is often a label used pretty broadly; like describing UV rays as ‘sun shine’). It can be easier if, instead of reinventing the wheel, we come up with a chemical that replaces phosphorous, and then deal with the side effects as they come. The free market decides such things. Ie. As phosphorous yields diminish, phosphor becomes more expensive, leading to businesses seeking competing alternative solutions. But instead, Land Institute is yet another backwards project that wants to plan for a future that they think they can predict. Can the Land Institute predict the stock market? If not, then why do they think their one solution is the correct one? Why should farmers stop everything so that Land Institute can try to force their one suggestion that may not work? It’s a rolling of the dice on a person’s farm. You force one solution, you don’t leave room for other solutions. Here’s a question – how is a suggestion such as that not non-inclusive, close minded and incredibly shallow?
This is called dialectics and I agree, it’s an excellent form of farming. Sadly, it will not happen if we expect to get this past congress or through normal processes. We have to force companies to do this, even if it’s not profitable immediately. These regulations must be forced upon society before it’s too late. But people don’t want to contend with the consequences of what that will mean on society.