Microsoft Edge is a popular browser with low RAM and CPU usage, consuming the least amount of RAM and CPU compared to Chrome, Firefox, and Opera. Its CPU usage is similar to Edge’s, but the extra RAM usage is more of a ceiling. Process Tamer is a free system utility software that optimizes CPU usage by automatically detecting applications or processes consuming excessive resources and adjusting their settings. When a device’s battery is low, Microsoft Edge sets itself to efficiency mode, significantly reducing system resource usage like CPU and RAM.
Productivity in web apps typically includes network, I/O, CPU, and memory. Virtualization allows for better performance in tasks like video editing, 3D modeling, and physics simulations. In general, CPU-bound applications will perform better with faster RAM. However, increasing process priority only helps in specific situations, especially if the process is CPU-bound and has a high memory usage.
To install a web app or PWA on your Mac or Windows, consider the RAM size and speed. A larger and faster RAM allows more active data for tasks like gaming, 3D modeling, or other tasks. To improve application performance, invest in hardware such as faster CPUs with more cores. When choosing the best PCs for small businesses, it is essential to balance processor speed and RAM usage to ensure optimal performance.
📹 Does More Core Means Better Performance? | CPU Cores & Threads Explained
What programs use a lot of RAM?
Lack of RAM can cause unresponsive programs, slow computer performance, and lagging load times. RAM is crucial for proper computer functioning, especially with memory-hungry applications like office programs, multimedia editing packages, and graphics-intensive games. Multi-tasking, such as listening to music while working, streaming movies while downloading files, and editing spreadsheets with multiple tabs open, requires more RAM. To find compatible computer memory, refer to the provided resource.
How do I reduce 100% CPU usage?
In order to reduce the high CPU usage and thereby improve the performance of both PCs and laptops, it is necessary to right-click on the Windows icon. This will result in optimized system performance.
Is AMD better than Intel for productivity?
AMD and Intel both offer a variety of processors to suit different needs and budgets. Intel is currently leading in performance and value, while AMD excels in power efficiency and specialized gaming CPUs. The choice between the two depends on specific requirements, budget, and use case. As competition intensifies, consumers can expect more innovation and better value from both companies in the future.
How much RAM do I actually need?
The amount of RAM needed depends on your computing needs and budget. For basic web browsing and document creation, 4GB or 8GB is usually sufficient. For tasks like photo editing and streaming media, 16GB may be necessary. For gaming or video editing applications, even higher amounts (e. g., 32GB) may be needed for optimal performance. Modern computers often come with even higher amounts of RAM, up to 64GB, which can greatly improve overall performance for certain applications.
When choosing a laptop for college, the amount of memory needed depends on the specific tasks. For basic tasks, 4GB or 8GB should be sufficient. For more intensive tasks, 16GB or more is recommended. Many newer laptops come with even higher amounts of RAM, up to 64GB, which can provide an improved user experience.
When shopping for a new laptop, it is essential to consider the amount of RAM needed to accommodate your individual computing habits. For basic tasks, 4GB or 8GB should suffice. For harder applications, 16GB of RAM is likely required. For more intensive tasks, up to 32GB is recommended. Modern laptops often come with even larger amounts of RAM, up to 64GB, which can provide improved performance and better usability.
In conclusion, when choosing the right laptop for your needs, it is crucial to consider your budget constraints and the amount of RAM each device possesses.
Why do people prefer AMD over Intel?
AMD and Intel processors are renowned for their superior performance, power consumption, architecture, and features. AMD processors offer better value for money and improved power efficiency, while Intel processors are known for their high performance in gaming and content creation. The choice between AMD and Intel processors depends on the user’s specific needs and budget. AMD processors have made significant strides in recent years, offering competitive gaming performance, especially in multi-threaded games.
When choosing between AMD and Intel processors, consider factors such as budget, performance needs, specific applications, power consumption, heat output, overclocking potential, and software support. Research and compare the specifications of specific processor models to determine the best choice for your needs.
What programs use a lot of CPU?
It is anticipated that the central processing unit will be subjected to a considerable degree of utilisation when the user is engaged in activities such as gaming, video editing, streaming applications, conducting antivirus scans, or managing multiple browser tabs simultaneously.
Is AMD or Intel better for multitasking?
The AMD vs Intel decision is influenced by individual preferences, workloads, and budget constraints. AMD offers more cores for the price, making it appealing for multitasking and productivity, while Intel excels in single-core performance, making it the preferred choice for gaming enthusiasts. Both companies continue to innovate, offering consumers an expanding range of options. This blog is presented by YoungWonks, the leading coding program for kids and teens.
Is RAM or CPU more important?
The CPU and RAM are two crucial components in a computer, serving different purposes but equally important for achieving the desired performance. They are essential for a functional PC, and understanding the differences between them can help make the right choices. The CPU is the main processor, responsible for processing instructions, while the RAM is the memory used to store data. Both components are essential for a computer’s performance, and understanding their functions can help make informed decisions about which components to use. Understanding the basic differences between CPU and RAM can help ensure a well-rounded and functional computer.
What makes a CPU good for productivity?
The CPU, or processor, is responsible for providing instructions and processing power for a computer to perform its tasks. A more powerful processor can enhance the computer’s performance and optimize the power of existing RAM. This can help maximize the investment in new RAM. A faster processor is like a larger workbench, helping with tasks like a friend. However, deciding whether to buy a new computer may be necessary, as it may be necessary to add more RAM or a new processor.
Do more cores slow down a CPU?
A CPU’s processing power is influenced by its number of cores, with most modern server class CPUs having at least 8 cores. Some configurations can support over 30 cores per processor. Motherboards can contain multiple processors connected through the UPI or IntelĀ® Ultra Path Interconnect. High core count processors have advantages such as completing multiple tasks simultaneously and switching between programs easily. However, they also have drawbacks such as potential overheating and slow performance.
What is more important CPU cores or RAM?
The choice between CPU and RAM is a complex one, as both are essential components for a PC’s performance. A fast and capable CPU is typically the top priority, as it plays a critical role in the entire machine’s operations. RAM, on the other hand, is rarely at the top of users’ priority lists. A standard 16GB RAM kit is sufficient for most users, but 32GB is increasingly common for high-performance PCs and future-proofing. CPUs are more complex and difficult to manufacture than RAM, making them more expensive.
Therefore, budgeting more for CPU than RAM if buying part-by-part. It is crucial to ensure both CPU and RAM are up to the desired level of performance. Pairing a state-of-the-art CPU with 8GB RAM or a high-end 32GB RAM kit with an older budget CPU can result in a performance “bottleneck”, where one component prevents the other from operating at full capacity.
📹 The Best Web Browser
I’ve been on the hunt for a new browser for YEARS! Finally, I found my new home for a web browser that performs better than theĀ …
I bought an old HP Z440 with 4 core E5 1620 V3. Put in a E5 2670 V3 12 core only because the CPU was $15 Australian. I just wanted to have a crack. Thought about an NVME to see how things might go, but after some research, decided not to. Goes alright for a dinnasoar. Thanks for the informative article. I really had no idea. Cheers from Sydney Australia.
– This is not DE-GOOGLED. It still has the sign-in. – The Drama with Furries and Alex’s Response: alex313031.blogspot.com/2024/01/the-good-bad-and-ugly.html – Addressing old version concerns with M119 release in 01/2024 – If you are a firefox user he makes Mecury Browser – thorium.rocks/mercury – Wildvine is installed by default so all codecs and articles play without additional installs. – uBlock is need to block ads on youtube and other sites. Here are my filter lists (Also blocks all YouTube Shorts) – ix.io/4Jeh
Hey Chris, Thorium looks great so thanks for sharing this with all of us! Aren’t you concerned about updates, however, since Chromium (engine) gets regular updates but the browser itself can take a bit of time to update (based on the latest Github builds the last update was 2 weeks ago)? I guess it wouldn’t matter too much on just regular engine updates but what about pressing security flaws that need fixing?
Thanks for shining a light on this Dev’s work, we all love a clean fast experience whilst browsing, I do love Brave, shock horror, but will use this for a month to fully appreciate its speed and privacy, as I’ve said previously….Thanks to the Dev and yourself for highlighting this guy’s attention to detail… I’ve a feeling I’ll be using this over Brave, non commercial.
Is it odd that I’m fairly new to this website, but been an LTT “fan” for years yet Chris is the only techie I actually trust?… his debloat and debug scripts are phenomenal, his info is always straight and to the point, and I have a way better experience in my own daily computing following his instructions and recommendations than any other tech website…
I opened Thorium after downloading it on Windows 11 and it opens in that god damned AWFUL “efficiency mode” set by Windows (the default mode) which prevents it from accessing all of your system resources (so the browser can’t be run at full power, in the interest of being “eco-friendly”). There’s a workaround that I follow that fixes this problem in Google Chrome AND Brave Browser and shuts off opening in this mode. Followed that method to the T with the Thorium shortcut, but somehow, it never works. It always opens in efficiency mode, EVERYTIME. With the exact same method. So I’ll never be able to experience what the browser can actually do if it’s running with full access to system resources because it will never have that unless I can get it to stop loading in that damned mode. Such a fucking shame… š
On M1 Mac, Thorium gets 300 on speedometer vs 350 for chrome and 390 for Safari, so maybe it’s not quite optimized for Apple silicon yet Also every time I start up it says I’m not signed in with Google and sync is paused. I sign in and on next launch sync is paused again But I’ll be perusal its progress. Kudos to the dev. Mad lad as they say across the pond
Thanks so much for bringing this to our attention, it’s appreciated. A couple other notable features: Ublock Origin pre-installed. Can run in Portable mode. Wierdly, it runs the same speed as Chrome does for me (1% better), but I do have Ublock Origin installed there too. Note that the Windows AVX2 version is supposed to be the fastest version, though I saw just a 1% benefit to doing so over the regular Windows version.
1. If it’s one man project, it can die anytime soon, even if it’s open source 2. it’s based on Chromium code, so it’s dependent on Google’s whims like removing ability to block ads, change plugin infra, etc 3. by using it you’re actually helping huge monopoly to further dominate browser market That’s why I am sticking to Firefox (or its forks) anywhere I can š
Great article. Brave has become so bloated, with so much trash. No one, not even privacy conscious indiviuals, use IPFS Gateways or Brave Wallet or all these “Web3” APIs day to day. The only thing turning me away from ungoogled-chromium was the lack of hardware acceleration like everything else does. Thorium changes that, I finished switching browswers an hour after I watched the article. Where normal “Tech” YouTube consists of “RUN THIS FOR MORE FPS!” “RUN THIS!” your scripts & recommendations like your utility, tron, etc. are always the better solution.
Going to give this a try, but TBH…I can’t give up Vivaldi’s workspace setup. I run chrome for personal use…mostly for cross-device sync. Been looking to change off. Have done firefox a number of times but always have some issue or another. I run Vivaldi at work and I LOVE the workspaces. Chrome’s groups still requires a tab for each group to stay on-screen.
The performance advantage of Thorium depends on the instruction set of the CPU. Older CPUs (like my 2-core Pentium G4400) do not support the instruction set extensions that have come along in the last 8 years. For this reason, I installed the SSE3 build of Thorium. Using Thorium Speedmeter 2.1 to benchmark, my G4400 returned a score of 134 for Thorium v117. For comparison, Google Chrome v118 returned a score of 76.1. Google Chrome Canary v120, however, returned a score of 143. My PC has an NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 with 1GB GDDR5 SDRAM on a 128-bit bus, and I have hardware acceleration enabled. OS is Windows 10 Pro 22H2 v19045.3570.
I just wanna comment on your Windows 7 comment. Yes, it’s out of date, yes it’s missing a lot of features, yes it’s a ticking time bomb. But when it comes to raw speed, nothing beats it. You can debloat Windows 10/11 all you want, but I can launch my Windows 7 VM, with 0 optimizations, and default settings, and it will still somehow feel snappier than modern versions running on bare metal. Windows used to be soo good, but now, even though the hardware has advanced LOT, it still feels slower than it did, even after removing all the crap.
I tried Thorium for the first time and I’m a Firefox user – its a good alternative for sure since I’m able to save more RAM and uses less power, my only gripes on Chromium is its lack of ability to remember storage locations per website whenever I save/download things which is really a Quality of LIfe feature for Firefox. I wish this can be done on Thorium then it will be my Daily Driver cause its on par with Vanilla Firefox in terms of performance but uses less resources.
Unfortunately the Mac version doesn’t work, at least not on Monterey intel based MBP, and apparently in their Git there are people that has problems on other versions as well, plus, if you add that the Android version has no way to log in, that takes away from me being able to use it since synchronization between all devices is crucial for my workflow, and I don’t want to use the vanilla version of chrome on mobile.
I know this isn’t meant to be ungoogled, but I would love for this to make the webstore swappable with the chromium one and adding flags for the google server ties. UG unfortunately doesn’t keep up with the upstream (except for right now to fix libwebp). Alex also said he wanted to provide saner defaults, like turning off ad-tracking out of the box. If this makes it to the default Linux-repos, it could easily stand next to vanilla chromium and outshine it.
Gonna give it a try. Looks good on paper. Privacy does not seem as tight as Brave or (modified) Firefox, but from what I can gather it is good enough. The loading time really is impressive. Websites show really fast with my 1 GBit connection. If it will be my new browser I am happy to support the dev too.
Was curious so I installed it on an old Thinkpad T230x (3rd gen i5 twin-core 8gig ram) and installed it while perusal this article on Brave. It installed (Debian12) without issue, ran it with some of the more obnoxious UK news sites which are notorious for crap all over their pages – it was remarkably quick, significantly so. Very much worth a look. Having a TOR browsing plugin would be quite nice if they can manage that.
I remember that the strength, beyond stability, of Chrome in its early editions was its lack of bloat in its early days. Thorium won’t run on my main desktop as it wants newer CPUs, using newer instructions to overcome performance issues. Tried the Raspberry Pi edition on Raspberry Pi 4B – that one reports that it is the wrong architecture (arm64 in the package while Raspbian system is armhf).
Mercury is much faster than standard Firefox, but does not play well with at least some article streaming services. It will not play Netflex articles (which is ironic because it does play the previews just fine). Amazon prime complains that you can’t play high definition article, which is odd because the articles look much better than on vanilla Firefox. Love the lack of bloat. Don’t like some of the article restrictions.
@ChrisTitisTech For Mac they have a delayed release. I tried to build with latest version but failed to do so for mac arm. There is vanilla chromium available which we can use without a google account. My Question is where does Thorium and Chromium stands in terms on privacy and security. Is it a equivalent alternative who wants to stay on the latest chromium release for Desktop. For Mobile we have now cromite (Forked from bromite) which is a good alternative on andriod.
Same performance compared to a fresh Chrome install. Compared launch times, youtube articles launch times, performance at 4k@60fps. Sometimes Chrome seems to launch itself and launch youtube articles a fraction of a second faster while Thorium seems to playback articles smoother and less compressed. But this is just a feeling, as long as I couldn’t directly catch these differences.
I downloaded and installed Thorium, and strange stuff is happening. I’m on a Mac. When I installed it and ran it, I got an immediate popup that this developer used to have a certificate and sign their apps, but this binary is NOT signed, and wanted to know if I wanted to proceed. So, I said yes. Then Little Snitch went nuts and told me that half my house was trying to make an incoming connection to my browser: my LG TV, my Roku TV, an Xbox, something else with a Chinese made NIC. A half dozen devices were suddenly trying to connect back to my Mac.
when i installed it windows defender gave me a red box warning. I guess thats because this is not vetted by the antivirus yet? or is something to be concerned about? Second question how safe is it to run password apps like dashlane on this and chromium browsers in general? I appreciate any inputs on these questions and thank you for your time in advance. Have a blessed day,
00:08 Thorium ŁŁ Ų£Ų³Ų±Ų¹ Ł ŲŖŲµŁŲ Ų¹ŁŁ ŁŲ¬Ł Ų§ŁŲ£Ų±Ų¶Ų Ł ŲŖŁŲ§ŁŁ Ł Ų¹ Ų¬Ł ŁŲ¹ Ų£ŁŲøŁ Ų© Ų§ŁŲŖŲ“ŲŗŁŁ. 01:28 ŁŁŲÆŁ Ų§ŁŲ«ŁŲ±ŁŁŁ ŲŖŲŲ³ŁŁŁŲ§ Ł ŁŲŁŲøŁŲ§ ŁŁ Ų§ŁŲ£ŲÆŲ§Ų” Ł ŁŲ§Ų±ŁŲ©Ł ŲØŲ§ŁŁŲ±ŁŁ Ų§ŁŁŲ§ŁŁŁŁŲ§. 03:57 ŁŁŁŲ± Ų£ŁŲ¶Ł Ł ŲŖŲµŁŲ ŁŁŲØ Ų®ŲµŁŲµŁŲ© Ł ŲŖŁŲÆŁ Ų© ŁŲ„Ų¹ŲÆŲ§ŲÆŲ§ŲŖ Ų£Ł Ų§Ł ŁŁ Ų¬Ł ŁŲ¹Ų© Ł ŲŖŁŁŲ¹Ų© Ł Ł Ł ŲŲ±ŁŲ§ŲŖ Ų§ŁŲØŲŲ«. 05:12 ŁŲ¹ŲÆ Ł ŁŲ¶ŁŲ¹ Ų§ŁŲ«ŁŲ±ŁŁŁ Ł Ų“Ų±ŁŲ¹ŁŲ§ Ų±Ų§Ų¦Ų¹ŁŲ§ ŁŁŁ ŲŖŲµŁŲŲ§ŲŖ Ų§ŁŲŖŁ ŲŖŲŖŁ ŁŲ² ŲØŁ ŁŲ²Ų§ŲŖ Ų§ŁŲøŁŲ§Ł Ų§ŁŲŖŁŁŲ§Ų¦Ł ŁŲ§ŁŲ³Ł Ų§ŲŖ Ų§ŁŲŖŁŁŲ§Ų¦ŁŲ©. 06:26 Ungoogled Chromium ŁŁ Ł ŲŖŲµŁŲ ŁŁŲØ Ł ŁŲŖŁŲ Ų§ŁŁ ŲµŲÆŲ± ŁŲŖŁ ŁŲ² ŲØŲ£ŲÆŲ§Ų” ŁŁ ŁŲ²Ų§ŲŖ Ł ŲŲ³ŁŲ©. 07:46 Ų£ŁŲ¶Ł Ł ŲŖŲµŁŲ ŁŁŲØ 09:02 Thorium ŁŁ Ų£ŁŲ¶Ł Ł ŲŖŲµŁŲ ŁŲ¹ŲŖŁ ŲÆ Ų¹ŁŁ Ų§ŁŁŲ±ŁŁ ŁŁŲŖŁ ŲŖŲ¹ ŲØŲŖŁŲ§Ų²Ł Ų±Ų§Ų¦Ų¹.
I love this– but I can’t download articles on it— wihtout SCREEN RECORDING (which I can’t take the crap commercials out that way– have to edit them out later)… MY issue- NOTHING wrong with the browser!!! IT”S FAST- secure- and is everything you say it is and MORE!!!! THANKS SO MUCH– I sill love my FIREFOX- but this is FASTER and finds and gets stuff firefox does NOT.
Holy cats. I’m normally a Firefox user, so I ran Speedometer 2.0 against Firefox, Chrome and Thorium. FF was the worst, scoring an 83.5. Chrome was next with a 92.5. Thorium scored 227. lol That’s insanity. EDIT: Just tested Mercury on my machine, as well. It scored a 177. It’s crazy how fast these browsers are compared to vanilla FF and Chrome. EDIT2: Just tested Brave, coming in at 187.
Unfortunately, for some reason Thorium is slower than ANY OTHER browser for me. I don’t know why…I have a decent gaming PC. But, as I’m writing this on Opera, I’m loading this article in Thorium….Still spinning, white screen….I don’t know why it does this for me. Very disappointed…(Still loading)
This article goes on and on and on and on saying its better its better its better. The guy does lots of good stuff and features and and and and BUT this article NEVER tells you specifically even ONE particular thing that this browser does. NOT ONE SINGLE SPECIFIC THING is stated. ZERO. Had to click a thumbs down guy. Sorry. Please make a new article that says something specific.
So, I tested Thorium vs Chrome on speedometer 3 and Chrome (The Ram hog slow ass browser) is faster than Thorium (I think I got 20.3 and Chrome was 23.1) Now I don’t know what that really means when using the browsers normally (btw for once Thorium was actually the same version as Chrome also so you can’t use that as a reason)
“After years of searching …”, man, what kind of search engine must you have been using? And a browser doesn’t have to be the best as long as it works. By experience, I learned that using the default browser on any OS is one good practice for minimizing clutter and bloating your device. e.g. Safari on MacOS, Edge on Windows. Even on Linux flavors I also tend to leave and use their packaged browsers. It’s only the search engine I change and prefers using that does not leave footprints and gives you some semblance of privacy – as if there’s one if you’re connected on the grid.
Well, uh my own experience goes like this. I am poor, and for net I have to borrow one from the next house. I have 3 browser in my Mint install; Brave, Firefox, and this being the newest. For some reason, Thorium refuses to connect to anything beyond the 1st Google login (which yes I do log into, part of the test to see if it syncs with my latest Guguru stuff. It works), and with the same wifi (that’s honestly slow, my bad) it wont load any web, at all. It does looks fast with things, but until I can get it to open with the same network that Brave and Firefox can do just fine, I’ll keep with Brave for now. Maybe I’ll try it with my own phone hotspot though, see if it works
Installed the linux version on Linux Mint with no problem. Attempted to install the default windows version on Win 10 22H2 (latest build) via the mini-installer, the zip file, and even winget. Ultimately those gave application error 142. Based on comments under the github “issues” I tried the SSE3 version, which worked. I’m running a 2010 era Intel i3-370M on my laptop.
That VDPAU patch looked promising. On chromium I was hacking VDPAU support in by way of vdpau vaapi drivers, but that only worked for so long before the driver was ripped out my hands from portage and had to fall back to CPU based decoding once again. It’s been quite the nuisance. Even on my intel based Haswell GPU I’ve had updates to chromium constantly break the hardware accelerated article decoding. I really really wish that wasn’t the shit show it was. Maybe this is better at it? I dunno.
You should take a step back, i have many browsers on the Linux section of my Chromebook. They all run, even Edge. After installing Thorium it does not show a browser. It loads and loads but nothing is showing. It seems memory management wants it all, cant get it. Its bloated before you can even use it. Try that yourself buddy.
The benchmarks I ran shows Firefox is faster…. Interesting… And that was with a few tabs open and me just messing around on Firefox after using it on a new PC for a few weeks. Fresh install of Thorium was still slower… Maybe certain things are slower on Firefox compared to Thorium? Or maybe its faster on different CPUs? What makes it faster? More tests needed. “Test PC was GEM10 6800H”
I have Fedora 38. I’ve installed this browser after 4min into your article. I liked it, but something strange was happening. I’ve noticed that my machine was running at steady 28% CPU (7.6GB) with only Deezer playing and 10 static pages – nothing else “running” in background. I’ve closed it and opened Vivaldi with the same exact pages – CPU 4.5% 6.5GB …. Too much difference… I still think that Vivaldi’s interface is a little odd – specially for high res display (2k) – Thorium looks better. Other than that – everything that runs on Thorium seems to run in Vivaldi. For that HUGE difference on CPU usage alone, Thorium goes to the fridge …
After half a day testing I see Thorium and Mercury Browsers as “almost perfect but…” Thorium is great on PC but no extensions or just built-in ublock on mobile, so it’s useless on phone. And it really hurts, because for mobile Firefox user Thorium feels like jet powered bike after riding scooter… Serve all ADs possible but very fast xD. Mercury have no mobile version at all. For now I’ll just stick to Mercury because there is sync with firefox mobile.
Some people have been talking about Speedometer tests. I’ve run the test 3 times versus Edge. The first time I ran the test Thorium beat out Edge by about .2 (7.4 to 7.6). The second time Thorium was 7.6, Edge was 8.1. The third time Thorium was 7.1, Edge was 13.7. So if a higher number is better, I guess Edge is at least winning for me.
I use often Google Ads webpage in my work, the interesting thing is that it does always hang and is slow on Chrome and Chromium on Linux (no ad blocks nor other similar plugins), but it workls great on my Win 10… Other strange things happening is that Google try to protect me from my self, telling me they could not verify that I am me on Linux, while never on Windows… For me it looks like Google “discriminate” anything that may be more privacy oriented or that they have not full controll of, than the manistream OS… This is extremely anoying to be forced back to Windows just to be able to work… I must test it on Thorium, but I have no big hope š
I tested Brave, Thorium and Chrome side by side. Brave actually won hands down which surprised me. It clocked in at over 300. Thorium in the middle at around 250, and Chrome being the most sluggish at around 200. Can someone try to convince me that this is just in this test? I am serious when I’m saying this, I wanna learn about other good metrics. Thanks in advance.
How do you get tech support on this browser? When I go to “about thorium” and click “get help with thorium” it takes me to the Google chrome help page, not thorium. The problem is with the bookmark bar. I want to disable it but every time I do and then click the homepage button or exit the browser and come back the bookmark bar is showing again, 3v3n though the toggle in settings shows off. Bit of a glitch. And I wish the bookmark bar could be set to vertical instead of horizontal. There’s more screen real estate horizontally.
The only thing its fast at is collecting your info. Youtube (as you used for example) had to publically admit they slow down all other browsers not google based – because they are owned by google. You should avoid this data mining browsers at all cost. For mainstream Firefox is the best. I’m sure everyone will agree Edge is the hands down worst.