When In History Were Parents Able To Put Their Children To Death?

The youngest person to be executed in the 20th century was likely Joe Persons, executed by hanging in Georgia on September 24, 1915, for the rape of an 8-year-old girl. In 1642, Thomas Granger, 16, was hanged in Plymouth Colony, Massachusetts, for having sex with a mare, a cow, and some goats. This was America’s first documented execution of juveniles.

The actual execution of juveniles has become unusual in recent years, with only seven states – Missouri, Texas, Virginia, Georgia, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and – halting Simmons’s execution as cruel and unusual in violation of the U.S. Constitution. Amnesty International urges the Human Rights Council to call on states that still maintain the death penalty to ensure the safety of children of parents sentenced to death.

Slave children, who comprised about one-fifth of all children by the end of the eighteenth century, could be sold away from their parents at any time. Since 1990, Amnesty International has documented executions of juvenile offenders in six countries: Iran, Nigeria, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, the United States of America (USA), and China.

The “age of reason” was about 7, making it technically legal for someone to be executed while that young. The Massacre (or Slaughter) of the Innocents is a biblical story, while mainstream Bible scholars consider it a myth.

Efforts to hold parents accountable for their children’s behaviors are rooted in the very origins of the nation’s juvenile justice system. The sentencing of a parent to the death penalty or execution compromises the enjoyment of a wide spectrum of children’s rights, but it can be prevented.


📹 Trump and Harris go head to head in Philadelphia in surreal debate | The Daily T Podcast

Donald Trump and Kamala Harris went head to head last night for the first time in a live televised presidential debate on ABC.


Who is the youngest girl to be executed?

Hannah Ocuish, a 12-year-old Pequot Native American girl, was hanged on December 20, 1786, in New London, Connecticut, for the murder of Eunice Bolles, the 6-year-old daughter of a wealthy farmer. She is believed to be the youngest person executed in American history. In recent years, her guilt, culpability, and fairness of her trial have come into question. Henry Channing, a minister, published a sermon titled “God Admonishing His People of their Duty. a Sermon. Occasioned by the Execution of Hannah Ocuish, a Mixed Girl, Aged 12 Years and 9 Months, for the Murder of Eunice Bolles, Aged 6 Years and 6 Months”, which describes the negative and racially prejudiced light in which her early life was presented to the court. The sermon characterizes Ocuish as a fearsome violent criminal who nearly killed another victim at the age of 6 during a robbery of a gold necklace and clothing.

How common were executions in medieval times?

During the Middle Ages, public torture and execution were common practices in the United Kingdom, regarded as an acceptable form of punishment within the social context of the time. The degree of severity of the crime and the level of pain inflicted on prisoners exhibited considerable variation. Torture was employed as a means of extracting evidence and information, while public execution served as a deterrent to prevent future crimes.

Who was the man who survived his own execution?
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Who was the man who survived his own execution?

Willie Francis was an American teenager who survived a failed electrocution in the United States. He was convicted of murdering pharmacy owner Andrew Thomas in 1944, who had once employed him. Francis was executed at age 18 after an appeal to the Supreme Court failed. In August 1945, Francis was detained in Texas on suspicion of drug trafficking due to his carrying a briefcase and speaking with a stutter. Police claimed he was carrying Thomas’ wallet in his pocket, but no evidence was submitted during the trial.

Francis initially named several others in connection with the murder, but the police dismissed these claims. While under interrogation, Francis confessed to Thomas’ murder, writing, “It was a secret about me and him”. The meaning of his statement is still uncertain. Author Gilbert King in his book The Execution of Willie Francis alludes to rumors of sexual abuse of the youth by the pharmacist.

Francis’ first confession claimed he stole the gun used to kill Thomas from deputy sheriff August Fuselier, who had once threatened to kill Thomas. The gun and bullets recovered from the crime scene and Thomas’ body disappeared from police evidence just before the trial.

Were any children guillotined?

As documented by Thomas Carlyle in his 1830s book, The French Revolution, children were among those executed by the guillotine during the French Revolution. A History Carlyle makes two references to the execution of children by the guillotine, yet he does not provide any numerical data to substantiate these claims. Representative Lebon from Aras instructed mothers to remain at the scene while their children were detained by the guillotine.

What was the harshest punishment in the Middle Ages?
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

What was the harshest punishment in the Middle Ages?

The death penalty in Holland was a severe and brutal system, with different methods depending on the crime and the criminal’s status. The mildest form was beheading, used for important individuals and nobility, where the head was chopped off with a sharp sword. Commoners were hung on the gallows, while those suspected of heresy and other religious crimes were burned at the stake. This was the severest punishment, as it meant that the body could no longer be resurrected due to the total destruction of one’s body.

Jan de Bakker, the first victim of the persecution of heretics in Holland, was the first victim to suffer this gruesome death. The executioner’s skill and the severity of the punishment depended on the crime and the criminal’s status.

How many children have been executed?
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

How many children have been executed?

Since the reinstatement of the death penalty in 1976, 22 people have been executed for crimes committed while they were under 18. All of the executed individuals were males, and all were in South-central states. Twenty-one of them were 17 when the crime occurred, while one was executed at 16 years old. Due to the slow process of appeals since 1976, none were actually under 18 at the time of execution. The youngest at the time of execution was Steve Edward Roach, who was 23 at the time of execution.

In Thompson v. Oklahoma, the Supreme Court first held unconstitutional imposition of the death penalty for crimes committed aged 15 or younger. In 1989, Stanford v. Kentucky upheld capital punishment for crimes committed aged 16 or 17, with Justice Scalia’s plurality part criticized by Justice Brennan. Sixteen years later, Roper v. Simmons overruled Stanford, with Justice Kennedy becoming the key vote, while Justice O’Connor dissented.

What happened to orphans in medieval times?
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

What happened to orphans in medieval times?

The Romans established their first orphanages around 400 AD, following Jewish and Athenian laws that prescribed care for widows and orphans. Plato believed that orphans should be placed under public guardians, with men loving them as if they were their own children. Care for orphans was referred to bishops and monasteries during the Middle Ages. As children grew older, they were often given as apprentices to households to ensure their support and learn an occupation.

In medieval Europe, care for orphans tended to reside with the Church. The Elizabethan Poor Laws placed public responsibility on individual parishes to care for the indigent poor. The growth of sentimental philanthropy in the 18th century led to the establishment of the first charitable institutions catering to orphans. The Foundling Hospital, founded in 1741 by sea captain Thomas Coram, was the first such institution.

The first children were admitted into a temporary house in Hatton Garden, where they were sent to wet nurses in the countryside. At sixteen, girls were apprenticed as servants for four years, while boys were apprenticed into various occupations for seven years. A small benevolent fund for adults was also established.

Who was the second youngest person to be executed?

George Junius Stinney Jr. was executed on June 16, 1944, and his conviction was subsequently vacated on December 16, 2014. He was apprehended on March 23, 1944, and was subsequently apprehended at the South Carolina Penitentiary. He died on March 23, 1944. Memorials and gravestones commemorate him and his victims.

What is the cruelest execution method from medieval times?

The act of sawing a person’s flesh with a sharp blade is a painful method of killing, particularly when the blade is used longitudinally, starting from the anus and groin, through the abdomen and torso, and then separating the skull. In most recorded instances of this method of killing, the blade is used transversely through the abdomen.

What happened to orphans in the 1700s?
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

What happened to orphans in the 1700s?

Orphanages and similar institutions in America have roots in the British colonies, where children were swarmed in the early 1700s, leading to the establishment of workhouses and working schools. One London workhouse opened in 1698, allowing children to work by spinning wool and repairing clothes. The records of England’s workhouses can be found in local parish archives, microfilm, or online resources.

The first documented orphanage in the United States was opened in New Orleans in 1727, founded by a group of Ursulines. However, Priscilla Ferguson Clement found that children admitted to orphanages were not always truly orphans, as some had only lost one parent or both parents living. By 1915, only 15 of the children registered with the New Orleans Board of Prisons and Asylums were reported as full orphans.

A large number of orphaned children in the colony of Georgia led to the founding of America’s next orphanages. In 1737, America’s second orphanage opened under Johan Martin Bolzius in Salzburger, Germany. Three years later, George Whitfield opened the Bethesda Orphan-House near Savannah, Georgia. Early accounts note that the colony of Georgia had several orphaned children who were fed and clothed in public stores.

The records of the three men ‘Trustees of the Orphans’, along with the Bethesda Orphan-House, are crucial resources for tracing an orphan child in colonial Georgia.

How were orphans treated in the Victorian era?
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

How were orphans treated in the Victorian era?

During the Victorian era, orphans were subjected to harsh and inhumane treatment in workhouses, including long hours, dangerous conditions, limited food, and physical and emotional abuse, which often resulted in poor mental health.


📹 ABC News Prime: Springfield, OH in spotlight; Matthew Perry’s death investigation; Oprah on AI

Springfieldohio #matthewperry #oprah #ai Subscribe to ABC News on YouTube: https://abcnews.visitlink.me/59aJ1G ABC News …


When In History Were Parents Able To Put Their Children To Death?
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Rae Fairbanks Mosher

I’m a mother, teacher, and writer who has found immense joy in the journey of motherhood. Through my blog, I share my experiences, lessons, and reflections on balancing life as a parent and a professional. My passion for teaching extends beyond the classroom as I write about the challenges and blessings of raising children. Join me as I explore the beautiful chaos of motherhood and share insights that inspire and uplift.

About me

8 comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • It’s weird because as a moderate independent American, I listen to the telegraph because of their unwavering support for Ukraine and I like that. But sometimes I forget that they’re actually a right leaning conservative.. kind of creepy media outlet. For example: the guy in this vid is far more insufferable than Kamala Harris. He doesn’t actually have any substantive critiques so he just doesn’t like the way her voice sounds … that is pretty spot on for a right leaning conservative these days. I feel like this article is what stupid people think smart people sound like.

  • As an American who has been very grateful for the excellent Telegraph coverage of Ukraine, I’m sorry to say that I’m disappointed so far with other areas of The Telegraph. I’m fine with an organization having a more conservative lean, but a news organization should fundamentally be objective and report facts. Kamala Harris is a very competent person who discussed items in detail in the crowded 2020 Democratic party primary. But once she moved from senator to Vice President, she handled the job as everyone in that position is expected to – to support the President and his policies (perhaps soon her policies) and to not have any differences. If she was running against a normal Republican, then there would have been more of a policy discussion in a debate. And Joe Biden dropped out extremely late by American standards, which seriously curtailed Kamala Harris’ ability to present a distinct platform of her own. She is running against Trump and the name of the game is to win the election. So, her talking points were focused on connecting with voters to get more votes and to avoid topics that could get her into trouble – smart. The American federal government operates very differently from a parliament system, and it is very rare for presidential policies to successfully make their way through 2 branches of Congress without substantial changes from 535 members – most of whom are up for re-election every 2 years. So, American presidential campaigns in the last few months typically keep discussions at a higher level to debate directions and goals over details.

  • In defense on social media and smartphones during the ban discussion at the end, I would like to say that the modern technology allows us to get connected with everyone in the world, which is absolutely crucial for mental health in immigration or for the introvert personality. of course banning anything is a simple quick solution rather than exploring the opportunity and communicating through careful analysis. What the lady says about responsible parenting is absolutely the key to stay up to date and not fighting the river stream. Not being able to manage your time and attention is not entirely the technology’s fault but more an evidence of lack of self discipline when nobody announced the rise of the bar but it silently happened. We should talk more about filtering and developing the digital culture rather than falling nostalgic about the green grass. The trees are still waiting to get climbed.

  • I love this website. I don’t care that the economy boomed under trump. I don’t care that he reduced the drain on resources by reducing illegal immigration. I don’t care that he’s patriotic and put America first. I just hate the way he speaks. This guy’s impression of him was great. Kamala is standing against him so I’m supporting her. I’m grateful that they were respectful to Kamala and didn’t mock her lovely laugh.

  • “Cuz she didn’t do a great deal” (as vice prez) yeah doof, NO vice president’s do a “great deal” in America, they are treated as a SPARE. They are suppose to case deciding votes in a split senate and represent the president on the foreign stage when appropriate. That’s it. That’s every vice president in modern times.

  • I continue to hear this criticism that she has not fully explained a policy issue, and I am still wondering which policy issue has mr trump clearly explained? Mass deportations? He has a concept of a health care plan? An economic plan that Nobel prize winners in economics have said would destroy the US economy? Can we get some parity in this “policy issue” discussion?

  • Is she saying its so good, that she listened to someone saying they are eating peoples pets? THEY ARE EATING PEOPLES PETS. Who was the one who let the Haitians in by the thousands? Kamila. What are the people saying about their towns? They want to leave, seen many interviews, was people throwing stuff in ladys garden, another dude said he see them cooking a cat on a bbq in the street. The telegraph are laughing at this? sick

  • As a British person who only watched the debate out of boredom, the debate was…uncomfortable. Harris did NOT handle this debate well. But Trump was also very, very weird. The only takeaway I have from this debate is that the US is beyond the point of screwed if these 2 are considered their best candidates

Pin It on Pinterest

We use cookies in order to give you the best possible experience on our website. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies.
Accept
Privacy Policy