The study examines discrimination and police discrimination among Latino/a youth in the U.S. Southwest, focusing on income inequality and group-level mobility among full-time working whites, Blacks, Native Americans, and Asian and Latino subgroups. Low job growth and lack of urban settings have led to out-migration of working-age people to surrounding states. Persistent income gaps indicate multitiered racial/ethnic-gender hierarchies in the Southwest, suggesting exclusion of minority men and women.
The Mexican Repatriation program of the 1930s effectively emptied many Latino barrios of their inhabitants. Over the last five decades, diversity has emerged as a term applied in the context of racial inequalities. The revised racial and ethnic composition shows greater diversity among children and young adults than among the elderly.
Military rates among Black Americans are higher throughout most of the life course, relative to White Americans. The Southwestern United States holds a rich history of Black people who settled, developed, and enriched the land. Assimilation programs have resulted in many Indian peoples losing much of their culture and languages.
Pre-Colombian Native Americans were among the healthiest and least healthy groups to live in the Western Hemisphere before the twentieth century. Korean Americans suffered economic losses and emotional and psychic damage, but they tried to maintain a delicate balance between population and natural resources. Hispanics have played a major role in U.S. population growth over the past decade.
📹 Growing up Pentecostal… #short
What is the largest minority group in the United States?
As of July 1, 2022, the United States’ Hispanic population reached 63. 7 million, making it 19. 1% of the total population. 13 states had one million or more Hispanic residents in 2022. Harris County, Texas saw the largest increase in Hispanics, up 1. 7 from July 1, 2021 to July 1, 2022. Other states with one million or more Hispanic residents include Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Washington.
How has the US demographic change by race?
The US population has seen significant changes in diversity since 2010, with the white non-Hispanic group making up 58. 9% of the population in 2022. The Census Bureau’s Population and Housing Estimates Program (PEP) data by county provides detailed information on age, race, and ethnicity, but the reporting and grouping of these populations have changed over time. The size of the US population has also shifted over time.
What is the main reason behind the rapid increase in minority populations in the United States?
The demographic trajectories of non-Hispanic Whites and minorities in the U. S. are influenced by key demographic forces. Natural increase, which includes births minus deaths, contributed 62% of the modest U. S. population gain last year, while immigration contributed 38%. Although natural increase and immigration have diminished over the past few years, they continue to contribute to the growing diversity of the U. S. population.
The minority population is growing due to births exceeding deaths and modest immigration gains, while the non-Hispanic White population has slightly diminished due to reduced births, increased deaths, and minimal immigration.
The driving force behind the minority population’s growth is natural increase, with 2. 9 minority births for every death, and even higher ratios among Hispanics. This is due to the minority population being nearly ten years younger and having slightly higher fertility rates. Between 2018 and 2019, 70% of the minority population increase came from natural increase, while 83 percent of the increase was natural increase among Hispanics.
On the other hand, more non-Hispanic Whites are dying than being born, with only 87 births for every 100 non-Hispanic White deaths last year. The modest immigration of non-Hispanic Whites is not enough to offset this natural decline, resulting in a small population loss.
How did World War I impact the lives of minorities?
World War I marked the beginning of the 20th-century civil rights movement, as it provided African Americans with opportunities to demand their civil rights, both within and outside the military. The war also transformed the racial and political consciousness of a generation of black people, particularly those who served in the military. This shaped the activism and resistance of black people throughout the postwar period. W. E. B.
DuBois organized the Pan-African Conference in 1919, aiming to challenge European imperialism in Africa and lay the foundation for the gradual independence of African peoples. The conference was a significant moment in the political organization of black people and the larger history of African independence.
How did treatment of minorities change during the depression?
The Great Depression severely impacted African Americans, with half of them out of work by 1932. Racial violence increased, particularly in the South, and lynchings rose to 28 in 1933. President Franklin Roosevelt’s election changed voting patterns, as he entertained African American visitors at the White House and had black advisors. Historian John Hope Franklin noted that many African Americans were excited by Roosevelt’s energy in tackling the Depression’s problems and gained a sense of belonging.
However, discrimination continued in New Deal housing and employment projects, and President Roosevelt did not support legislation favored by groups like the NAACP. When the U. S. entered World War II, labor leader A. Philip Randolph threatened a march on Washington to protest job discrimination in the military and defense-related activities. In response, President Roosevelt issued Executive Order 8802, allowing all persons, regardless of race, creed, color, or national origin, to participate fully in the defense of the United States.
What changed for minority groups and immigrants in the United States during the Great Depression?
During the Depression, racial discrimination was widespread, with minority workers losing jobs, being denied public works programs, and facing threats at relief centers. Violence against minorities increased as whites competed for traditionally held jobs. Minorities were excluded from union membership and unions influenced Congress to keep antidiscrimination requirements out of New Deal laws.
The New Deal, a broad array of federal social and economic programs created under President Franklin D. Roosevelt, was criticized by many minority citizens as a “raw deal”. However, improvements did occur by the mid-1930s, with the introduction of the Indian New Deal by John Collier in 1934, which provided increased funding for economic development of tribes, promoted continued Indian traditions, and supported tribal governments.
By 1935, the Roosevelt administration ended racial discrimination in some federal programs, set aside larger amounts of relief aid for blacks, and appointed several blacks to federal positions. This led to the majority of black voters voting for Roosevelt in the 1936 presidential election, ending a seventy-five-year period of black loyalty to Republican candidates. Roosevelt created an advisory group of black American government employees to advise him on issues important to them.
How did ww2 change American life?
The war production effort in the United States significantly impacted American life, with millions of men and women entering the service and production booming. This led to a significant decrease in unemployment and new opportunities for women, African Americans, and other minorities. Millions of Americans left home to work in war plants, resulting in a significant increase in economic output. The war effort on the “Home Front” required sacrifices and cooperation, leading to the adoption of rationing and recycling practices.
The “Food for Victory” campaign aimed to conserve resources and produce more food, with millions of “Victory gardens” growing and producing over 1 billion tons of food. Americans canned food at home and consulted “Victory cookbooks” for recipes and tips to make the most of rationed goods.
What is the fastest growing race in the United States?
Asian Americans are the fastest-growing racial group in America, with a growth rate of 35. Multi-racial Asian Americans are also the fastest-growing, with a growth rate of 55. As of 2022, European American mothers make up around 50% of the US population, while Asian American and Hispanic women have seen an increase of 2 and 6, respectively. The 12 month ending general fertility rate increased from 56. 6 to 57. 0 in 2022 Q1 compared to 2021 Q4.
How did ww2 change the lives of American minorities?
World War II sparked a renewed militancy among African Americans, with the NAACP launching major attacks against discrimination and segregation, even in the Jim Crow South. Social pressure to end segregation increased during and after the war, with Gunnar Myrdal’s classic study of race relations, An American Dilemma, published in 1944. President Harry S Truman continued President Roosevelt’s use of executive powers outside Congress to advance black civil rights, commissioning a study of racial inequities in 1946.
The Second Reconstruction was paved by legal victories in Supreme Court cases, including Executive Order 9981 in 1948, mandating equality of treatment and opportunity for all those who served in the country’s defense. The Supreme Court’s 1954 decision in Brown v. Board of Education is considered the birth of the modern civil rights movement.
How did the New Deal impact minority groups?
The New Deal provided significant benefits to African Americans, including low-cost public housing, education opportunities, job opportunities, and support for Black authors. However, discrimination was common, and local administrators often discriminated against African Americans. The National Youth Administration and the Civilian Conservation Corps helped African American youths continue their education.
The Works Progress Administration provided jobs and supported Black authors like Zora Neale Hurston and Melvin B. Tolson. The Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO) organized large numbers of Black workers into labor unions, with over 200, 000 members by 1940.
How has demographic transition changed the USA?
The aging of the American population is resulting in a decline in the number of individuals in the prime working age range, which is contributing to a reduction in the labor force, diminished productivity, increased pressure on the federal budget, and slowed economic growth.
📹 Why the US Gov Reshapes the Mississippi River
Video written by Ben Doyle Check out our other channels: http://youtube.com/wendoverproductions …
So if you zoom out to time scales of 5,000 years or so, the Mississippi river is / always was going to find a way to move into the Atchafalaya basin anyhow. Regardless of what Shreve may have done at some point. The Old River control structure alone will not be able to keep it in website forever. Some other leak somewhere else is going to inevitably spurt out, because the Atchafalaya basin is a shorter and steeper path to the Gulf right now. If Uncle Sam wants to keep the river in website long term, it’s gonna have to keep plugging holes. This is also why Louisiana has a really bad “coastal erosion” problem. By keeping the river in website, the river has built the current Mississippi delta way out into the Gulf of Mexico, and it’s dumping all that sediment into deep water where it’s not doing anything. Meanwhile, erosion just continues eroding the rest of the coast. If the river went into the Atchafalaya website where it wants to go, the sediment would end up rebuilding the eroded wetlands in that area, and the current delta would retreat back to a more defensible position. Geologists have mapped out a whole series of river website migrations over the last several thousand years, where it tends to kind of sweep back and forth across most of Louisiana, keeping the general extent of the coast line even up until when the Old River control structure was built.
Shreve was involved with many river ‘engineering’ projects with unintended consequences. Probably the biggest was him clearing out a massive ancient log dam on the Atchafalaya River known as the Great Raft. With the dam cleared, the river started to flow again and cut much deeper which probably was a major contributing factor to the issues described in this article.
It wasn’t actually the digging of Shreve’s Cut that started the avulsion of the Mississippi into the Atchafalaya, but the clearing of the Great Raft from the Atchafalaya. This increased water flow into it, and eventually allowed it to start capturing the Mississippi, leading to the current clusterfuck.
No, the cut was not the problem. Removing the log jams in Atchafalaya river aka Great Raft was the problem. The log jam blocked majority of Mississippi water from flowing down Atchafalaya for centuries. And in fact, if there was no Shreve’s cut after removing the great raft, lower Mississippi would dry up much quicker.
This is an example of WHY regulations came into existence. People who do not know or care to know the consequences of their decisions being able to cause untold future capital expenditure OR death & destruction. The reason you need an environmental study whenever you want to build a big project? to stop stuff like this from happening again, or at least giving people a heads-up on what they’ll need to fork out in the future to deal with the downstream consequences. Those regulations SEEM overhanded because for every one ecological disaster in waiting they avert, most reports just come back essentially “all good”. The number of times an entity’s “simple project” turned out to have huge unintended consequences that lead to excessive struggle, costs, and death would turn your stomach.
For those that have never seen them, the levees along the lower Mississippi River are almost too large to describe. At least it amazed me, who grew up in Minneapolis, where the River is a rather modest stream flowing in an ordinary-looking website. There are a couple floodwalls, etc., here and there, but nothing really massive like down in Louisiana.
This article made 0 sense so I had to research it – and yea, the article is wrong . The website did not divert the flow of the Mississippi to the side river, that doesn’t make sense, in fact a more direct website through the bend should lead to less water flowing westward. Apparently, the river flowed fine until a log jam was removed which then caused more water to flow westward. Ironically, Shreve did actually lead this project, so he did cause the damage, but not fully because of the website.
504 ya heard me! during the last few major hurricanes they seemed pretty worried around here about the river control structure getting washed away. and I think it was last year or the year before during the high river season it was getting almost too high around that area and they were worried about it then too. theres a youtube website by a local teacher named loren klien and he made some cool articles about it back then.
While it is true that New Orleans, the largest city in Louisiana, would lose its source of drinking water, Baton Rouge would generally not. The Southern Hills Aquifer supplies Baton Rouge with some of the best water in the nation. While this would still be bad, a lot of people in Baton Rouge would be saved from the drinking water shortage.
Way to butcher Atchafalaya. Also, you’re factually wrong that the river changing courses would take away Baton Rouge’s water supply. Baton Rouge’s water supply comes from a groundwater supply known as the Southern Hills Aquifer System, NOT the Mississippi. Honestly, this is a basic fact. There is an entire state agency dedicated to preserving this system. How this fact was missed is beyond me. Sloppy writing and fact checking.
Bad article Sam. You completely failed to explain why Shreve’s cut had anything to do with the Mississippi diverting into the Atchafalaya. From the diagrams you show, sure looks like that is something that would’ve happened anyways. Very pithy actually interesting information and heavy on condescending bad jokes. Not worth what I paid to watch it on Nebula unfortunately.
The Mississippi has changed course in its delta about every 1000-1500 years which has essentially created most of southeast Louisiana .The delta switch is overdue and this course change likely would still have happened but Shreve cut and the clearing of the great raft log jam simply sped up this process.
All river deltas are flood zones where sediment slowly builds new land and the river changes course over hundreds of years. However, it is very annoying for people to live on land that is constantly flooding, so people build levees to prevent flooding. The levees also prevent river sediment from spreading out over the delta, so the river silts up as the soil in the surrounding land naturally sinks as it becomes compressed. Eventually we get to what we have now, which is cities built on land now below sea level surrounded by levees that need constant maintenance and a silted river so much higher than surrounding land that any break in the levees will cause massive flooding.
For the last while I had being asking myself why I lost interest in HAI articles, but after perusal this one I now know exactly why. I know that there was a great deal of work put into this article, and it is fully possible that everyone who worked on it is happy and satisfied with it, but this is honestly one of the lowest quality HAI articles I have ever watched. 20% of the article is just an ad, the topic was not actually addressed, proper information was not even hinted at being mentioned, the title is completely useless, and so many more problems. I cannot properly express my disappointment. So long and goodbye subscription.
Shreve’s Cut doesn’t seem to have been the primary reason the Atchafalaya River began capturing more of the Mississippi River. If anything Turnbull’s Bend was encouraging that. The major contributor to the river trying to divert was the clearing of The Great Raft, a colossal log jam obstructing the flow of the Atchafalaya River. With that gone, the Atchafalaya’s naturally steeper path made it the more favorable route, regardless of Shreve’s Cut.
Situations like this are a phenomenal demonstration of the Hubris of man and the problems we cause when we try to live somewhere in a way it could never support. Take Las Vegas for example. Gluttonous pot of greed of the west, and is entirely reliant on water from the Colorado River to survive, which has been getting lower and lower for years. Honestly, we should just abandon anywhere we ‘like’ to live where its entirely reliant on water from intermittent sources hundreds of miles away just to survive. The entire states of Nevada, Arizona, and maybe Utah too are wastelands that could never support the long term populations that have cropped up there under the demands of capitalism. We need to stop living in the damn desert. It’s bad for everyone when people try to put suburbia in the desert.
As a non-native English speaker, I always thought that the spelling of Mississippi is really weird. But perhaps not weirder than Massachusetts (two s’s first, then one s in the back), Tennessee (one e, two n’s, one e again, two s’s, and then two e’s), or Connecticut (you write the second c even though it is silent?).
Shreve’s Cut is only one relatively small part of his actions on the Lower Mississippi River. If Shreve had been content to simply cut off Turnbull’s Bend, it would not have been too much trouble later. The current problems were caused when Shreve cleared out the massive logjams that clogged up the lower Red River and the Atchafalaya, and by freeing water flow in the Atchafalaya, Shreve caused the Mississippi to try to change course. And there is historical precedent for the Mississippi River changing course. In the early decades of Illinois statehood, the French colonial city of Kaskaskia was one of its most prominent settlements, and indeed Kaskaskia also served as Illinois’s first state capital until the more inland Vandalism was developed. The course change of the Mississippi River at Kaskaskia involved several major floods devastating the city in the years leading up to the Big Flood that completely destroyed Kaskaskia and cut its environs off from the rest of Illinois. Today, Kaskaskia is one of the smallest incorporated places in the United States with a population of just fourteen, accessible overland only through Missouri.
The majority of the US petrochemical industry is located on the Mississippi between Baton Rouge and New Orleans because it requires massive quantities of fresh water. All of this industry would have to relocate to the Atchafalaya. The infrastructure for a substantial quantity of the US Gulf Coast oil industry is located in Morgan City and would have to relocate to higher ground. The 10’s billions of $ this would justifies billions used to keep the river nailed in place. but the high sediment load means the delta keeps growing into the gulf. Since the minimum elevation profile that will allow water to flow is 1 foot per mile for every mile longer the river gets it gets a foot higher.
The whole river is website controlled both to keep it going where it currently does and to prevent the natural flooding of millions of acres of alluvial farmland. Look at a topographic map of the river south of St. Louis and you’ll see remnants of previous river websites all over. The Atchafalaya is just one example. The River cut across an oxbow at Vicksburg in 1876 leaving the port there inaccessible. It’s a really tough balance between the ecological health of the upper Mississippi deltas, flood control, and economic benefits the river provides. Very glad I’m not in charge of the Mississippi Valley Division of the Corps.
There is a movie/documentary I watched about this that was made by a man that had spent his entire life living in the Atchafalaya Basin Louisiana coast. He had photos that were made when he was a kid that showed 20 years or so previously where there were trees and marsh and now it was nothing but water for 20 miles from the current Louisiana coast. Why is this happening? Very simple. The Mississippi levee system on this current website is not allowing the silt that would normally travel to the Louisiana coast to get there to maintain the marsh. He told how much coast they were loosing every year and it was a pretty substantial amount; a few miles a year the best I can remember. The decline started as soon as the levee system was built in the early 1900’s. I believe he even brought up the fact that the Mississippi would naturally move its route to the Atchafalaya basin if it were left alone and this would stop. He also talked about how this effects the New Orleans metro area; for every mile of marsh they loose; they loose a certain amount of protection from the gulf over taking the town. The next Katrina level hurricane that hits New Orleans will wipe it out permanently according to what he was saying.
In a college geology course the professor described how “straightening” the river dramatically increases the amount of top soil washed into the Gulf of Mexico. The delta where the Mississippi flows into the gulf continues to increase in size. In the original “oxbow” river rich soil was desposited on the riverbanks, not ending up as part of the delta at the mouth of the river. Want to be surprised ? Do a little research and see how much soil is deposited on the delta.
He didn’t mention the fact that this hasn’t fully reversed the change in waterflow, just that it’s helped the large cities grow bigger. The water use in New Orleans, Baton Rouge, & those in-between are still weakening the river’s output to the Gulf of Mexico. Communities like Pilottown & La Balize on the very mouth of the delta died due to the lack of water & erosion in those websites, so that now Venice is the closest permanently populated place to the mouth. Alternatively, the Acthafalaya River being strengthened has allowed for deposits to develop at it’s mouth, adding more land to the Louisiana coast as the other part shrinks.
I don’t think this was well explained. If a website is constructed to the right, then the water flows to the new website on the right. But then you are saying that the water flows to the left. It doesn’t make sense. It was not until I read the comments that I understood what the real problem was, which was not explained in the article
“Being one of the most efficient ways of moving people and cargo in, out and around the greatest country in the United States” Lmao. That weirdly sums up the patriot/nationalist American stereotype. They’re both the greatest country and the only country that matters. Hence the greatest country in their own own country alone I’m not trying to be mean. I’m only talking about the stereotype. Not real people. Just thought it was funny
Speaking of unforseen ecological consequences the delta of the Mississippi has lost more than 1,000 square miles of tidal protection land since the damming of the Mississippi and gas/oil exploration of the gulf. The name of this website is apt as the way the narrator delivers it its really only half as interesting as it should be. The witless sarcasm and blame is pointless and deters from what should be an interesting story. Like lack of foresight is something we’ve just discovered. Sheesh.
Hey! I am the person who suggested this article about the Old River Control Structure. I am overjoyed y’all chose to cover this very interesting topic. I am personally from Lafayette, and the Mississippi River is a core staple of our state’s cultural and economic heritage. I was doing a research project for an Research writing course at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette just on the history of the River, how the Native Americans interacted with the River, and how we have shackled the Old Man River. I was especially focused on the effects caused by the Mississippi completing an avulsion to the Atchafalaya. Again, thank you so much for covering this topic.