How Did Romans From The Middle Class Raise Their Kids?

Roman children received their education from their parents, with boys being taught to throw spears, use a sword, box, swim, and, if the family possessed one, ride a horse. Physical training was highly valued due to a boy’s future role as a defender of the Roman Empire. There were three levels of Roman education: basic skills needed for employment, refined writing skills and taught Greek, and the final level of preparation.

In ancient Rome, poorer freeborn children worked from a young age, while wealthier families could afford to send their children to school. Aristocratic Roman families often employed Greek-speaking tutors for their children, such as Livius Andronicus and Ennius. Ancient Rome had two types of schools: one for children up to 11 or 12 who learned reading, writing, and basic mathematics using an abacus, and older children attending more advanced schools.

Early education in Roman society was primarily the responsibility of the parents, particularly the mother. In the initial years, children were taught at home, learning the basics of Greek traditions, Roman politics, cosmology, and religious beliefs. The only children to receive a formal education were the children of the rich.

Roman education was based on classical Greek tradition but also included Roman politics, cosmology, and religious beliefs. Most Roman children did not receive a formal education, with the rich having tutors who were slaves. Education of both girls and boys began early, with Quintilian recognizing that a young child’s mind was especially receptive to knowledge.

Roman education had its first “primary schools” in the 3rd century BCE, which were not compulsory and depended entirely on tuition fees. They were taught writing, reading, basic calculation, and mathematics, generally by a private (probably Greek) tutor (slave). After breakfast, children would either learn from their mother, father, a slave, or a tutor. Wealthy parents might hire a private tutor.


📹 A glimpse of teenage life in ancient Rome – Ray Laurence

Welcome to the world of Lucius Popidius Secundus, a 17-year old living in Rome in 73 AD. His life is a typical one of arranged …


What were the Roman education practices?

Roman education was distinguished by a number of key characteristics, including the presence of formal curricula, literary canons, pedagogical methods, teaching materials, and schools. Additionally, bilingualism (Latin and Greek) was a prominent feature, as were the use of books and manuals. However, there was a notable decline in critical thinking and judgment during this period.

What was the ancient Roman education curriculum?
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

What was the ancient Roman education curriculum?

Roman education was centered around the trivium (grammar, rhetoric, and logic) and the quadrivium (arithmetic, geometry, music, and astronomy). The trivium focused on correct usage and linguistic precision in Latin and Greek languages. Rhetoric was crucial for the elite, aiming for political oratory and leadership roles. Logic, developed by ancient Greeks, honed critical thinking skills and was integral to legal and philosophical pursuits. The quadrivium subjects expanded the intellectual horizon, providing a well-rounded education for the Roman elite.

The Ludus, or primary school, marked the beginning of formal education for Roman children, typically starting around age 7. It taught basic reading, writing, and arithmetic from literature, with discipline being strict and corporal punishment being a common method of maintaining order.

What is the education system like in Rome?
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

What is the education system like in Rome?

Roman education consisted of three levels: basic skills for employment, refined writing skills and Greek, and preparing students for upper-class positions through rhetoric, law, and politics. The first “primary schools” were established in the 3rd century BCE, but they were not compulsory and relied on tuition fees. Wealthy families employed private tutors to teach their children at home, while less well-off children were taught in groups. Teaching conditions varied greatly between wealthy families and less well-off families.

Wealthy tutors provided comfort and facilities, while less well-off teachers rented rooms or set up schools in shop spaces. Poorer teachers held classes in outdoor public places, such as the trivium, corner of the street, or piazzas. Classes began at dawn and continued until noon, with some Roman poets complaining about being woken by the booming voice of a teacher and his outdoor class. Schools were privately operated by teachers and dependent on tuition fees.

What was education like for rich Romans?
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

What was education like for rich Romans?

In the 3rd century BCE, Roman education introduced its first “primary schools” which were not compulsory and relied on tuition fees. There were no official schools in Rome, and wealthier families hired private tutors to teach their children at home. Less well-off children were taught in groups. Teaching conditions varied greatly, with wealthy tutors providing comfort and facilities, while less well-off teachers rented rooms or set up schools in shop spaces.

Poorer teachers held classes in outdoor public places like the trivium, corner of the street, or piazzas. Classes began at dawn and continued until noon, with some students being woken by the booming voice of a teacher and his outdoor class. Schools were privately operated by teachers and dependent on tuition fees.

How did the Romans educate their children?

Ancient Rome had two types of schools: one for children up to 11 or 12 who learned reading, writing, and basic mathematics using an abacus, and more advanced schools for older children studying topics like public speaking and writings of great Roman intellects. Girls were not typically in these schools, as they could get married from age 12. Boys received lessons in honorability and physical training, while girls from rich families received home education to learn how to be a good wife and run a good household. The school week was seven days with no weekend, but religious holidays, market days, and summer holidays were common.

What was the average age of childbirth in ancient Rome?

Ancient women who survived childhood mortality, received adequate nutrition, and did not work hard during childbirth could live long lives. They began procreation after marriage at 15 years, had an average of seven children, and childbearing lasted 14-21 years. Breastfeeding, usually with contraceptive effect, continued for 2-3 years. Limited facts, written evidence, and findings suggest the possibility of late childbearing in the Mediterranean and Near-Eastern ancient world, particularly for the Jews. This is supported by secular texts, sacred books, narratives, and myths.

At what age did Roman girls become adults?

The legal status of girls at the age of twelve was more clearly defined, as they were regarded as being of marriageable age and as adults. Nevertheless, the majority of girls were not married until later in life, with the exception of those belonging to the wealthy upper class. There was no specific rite of passage associated with this transition.

In what ways were Roman children taught?
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

In what ways were Roman children taught?

Roman children were taught at home until around the age of twelve, learning letters, music, and elementary Arithmetic and counting using both the abacus and their fingers. Quintilian’s work recommends studying Geometry for two reasons: mental training through the logical progression of axioms and proofs, and its usage in political discussions and land-measurement problems. Sophists in Rome would focus more on teaching the art of speaking, Oratorio, and current affairs than advances in science and Geometry.

Numerous texts recommended educational courses for middle and artisan classes, as well as the ruling class. Vitruvius, writing for architects, suggested that students should include knowledge of Geometry, Optics, Arithmetic, Astronomy, Law, Medicine, Music, Philosophy, and History. Galen recommended prospective doctors to study various subjects, including Medicine, Rhetoric, Music, Geometry, Arithmetic and Dialectics, Astronomy, Literature, and Law. Varro and Seneca also recommended Geometry and Arithmetic as necessary.

Despite being frowned upon in education, Mathematics was taught where necessary. The low opinion of Mathematics may have been due to the professions that required mathematical or scientific learning, which were generally considered ‘illiberal’ and looked down on. Those requiring advanced levels of Logic, Rhetoric, and Oratorio were preferred. This attitude is reflected in Britain during the Mediaeval and Renaissance years, and has only recently been changed.

What are the three stages of Roman education?

Imagine setting up a school for young Romans, focusing on the three stages of Roman Education: Ludus, Grammaticus, and Rhetor. Each group should focus on one stage, including the type of school, location, number of students, teacher, slaves, resources, writing materials, classroom setup, subjects taught, tasks/activities, discipline, and more. Present your information in English, incorporating Latin phrases or sentences if desired, using various methods like video, poster, model, presentation, essay, or play, focusing on providing detailed, factual information about Ancient Rome’s school system.

Who taught wealthy children in Rome?
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Who taught wealthy children in Rome?

Rome, as a republic or empire, never formally established a state-sponsored form of elementary education. Instead, children of wealthy families received their education from private tutors, while those of less means were taught in a primary school, known as a ludus litterarius. The school was often run by a litterator or litteratus, who could set up their own school for meager wages.

Elementary education in Rome focused on everyday life requirements, reading and writing, with students progressing from reading and writing letters to syllables, word lists, and eventually memorizing and dictating texts. The majority of texts used in early Roman education were literature, predominantly poetry, with Greek poets like Homer and Hesiod used as classroom examples.

Students were expected to work independently, with no sense of a cohesive class. Young Roman students faced no formal examinations or tests, and their performance was measured through exercises that were either corrected or applauded based on performance. This competitive educational system allowed elites to maintain class stability, but it also prevented most Roman students from advancing to higher levels of education due to the obvious monetary expenses.

Which portion of education were the wealthy Roman families most interested in having their children learn?
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Which portion of education were the wealthy Roman families most interested in having their children learn?

The reputation of a Roman family was established through education and training of children. Early Roman children were educated in the home, followed by grammar schools enrolling boys and girls from wealthy families until around the age of twelve. Education focused on reading, writing Latin and Greek, as well as arithmetic. Boys wore the toga virilis, a white toga representing their enrollment as citizens and entrance into manhood.

Roman citizenship was highly coveted, and sons of prominent families could go on to civil or military careers. After a son inherited his father’s property and debts, it became their responsibility to maintain the family’s reputation and prosperity.

Girls married at a young age, usually between fourteen and eighteen years old, often to an older man. Younger girls were viewed as more sexually pure and easier to control. In the most common form of marriage, a wife brought a dowry that became her husband’s property, giving her some sway in making marriage arrangements. Lower-class women were more reliant on their husband’s status to enhance their own.

The vast legal and age imbalance between husband and wife reflected in cultural restrictions on Roman women. Women were responsible for managing the household, overseeing enslaved people and dependents, and looking after children. Spinning wool was viewed as an ideal Roman woman’s activity, and many women held professions outside the home, including medicine, trade, and agriculture.


📹 ROMAN EMPIRE | Educational Video for Kids.

What are you waiting for? In this video we are going to know everything about the roman empire. As we always tell you, it is very …


How Did Romans From The Middle Class Raise Their Kids?
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Rae Fairbanks Mosher

I’m a mother, teacher, and writer who has found immense joy in the journey of motherhood. Through my blog, I share my experiences, lessons, and reflections on balancing life as a parent and a professional. My passion for teaching extends beyond the classroom as I write about the challenges and blessings of raising children. Join me as I explore the beautiful chaos of motherhood and share insights that inspire and uplift.

About me

15 comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • I think several things in this article are wrong/misleading. 1. Boys reached adulthood at 14, not 15. 2. Similarly for girls, they could not marry at 7 but at 12. From ages 7 to 12, they were considered to be in the latter stage of childhood but still children nonetheless. 3. At age 21, not 25, boys were no longer considered minors and lost the legal protection. However, unless the man emancipated himself from the power of his father (patria potestas, look it up), he wasn’t ‘trusted to arrange business deals’ his whole life, he had no legal capacity as a person alieni iuris no matter his age or societal status. Where did you get this information?

  • This seems inconsistent. The neighborhood Lucius is from is indicative of inadequate housing and poorer Roman citizenry, yet he’s fully educated, goes out on business trips with his father, and has rather amazing choice over his future prospects. Did Lucius’ family simply live in this area, but was far more well off than their neighbors, or is the implication that even the less wealthy of Rome lived this well?

  • This is bullshit! Lucius would be able to do bussiness deals from 14 years of age, even though the money and stuff would be his father´s. (He would have a tutor till 25 but that´s just control mechanism). He wouldn´t be able to marry a 7 year old girl! She would have to be 12 and agree with this marriage (afectio marritalis)! I studied Roman law so I know this very well

  • I’d be very curious to know what the average age would be for women to begin menstruation in Rome. I have heard that early menstruation is correlated with urban density and prior to the 19th century it rarely happened before the very late teenage years averaging something like 18…..but Rome was fairly dense. If it was still something like 18, then the woman would reach child bearing age….roughly 17, 18, when Lucius would become a financially secure and seasoned adult, being in his mid to late 20’s.

  • 1. Educate people about their glorious past (no errors, no doubts, all cool stuff) and how they’re superior to other nations. 2. Train them in the use of weapons and to never hesitate in front of an enemy. Being weak is NEVER an option. 3. Convince them, when reaching a certain age, to join the miles and miles of armies in order to protect the interests of leaders that will never move a finger and are just playing their own chess games. Congratulations: that’s the whole fucking world in a nutshell.

  • the wrong information here is that almost every one from ancient greek or rom has got dark hair and not blonde or red maybe some brown hair but for sure not blond and red hahaha…those were germans in the norths and they mixed up in the 5. -15. centuries sure there may be a few dark blond people but in this article almost everyone had red, brown and really fair hair

  • I had to watch this article for my World History class, and my teacher RUINED it for me! She was annoying, her work was tedious, and she always found a way to find what I liked to learn about (Ancient Rome for instance) and step on it. Hard. It’s truly a well informative article, but when teachers show this stuff they really make it less exciting.

  • Somehow I feel like no one there did anything like working. They may not be poor but shouldn’t they do something? Also, was being married to a child girl the norm? Most teenage in ancient Rome sure weren’t guys owning slaves and do all that stuff. It’s like showing us how someone today would live and using a child of some popstar, instead of the normal people who maybe haven’t even a job.

  • In schools today it should be mandatory to instruct all kids in Muay Thai, Wrestling, and Jujitsu. I firmly believe a bully would be less likely to pick a fight if everyone is trained in self defense. In addition the knowledge you can handle yourself gives one confidence in all aspects of their lives.

  • Am I the only one who finds this inaccurate? There were no schools in Rome. Parents had to hire tutors only the rich and esteemed families that is. The poorer families had to make due. Daughters were married off and sons were sold into slavery for the trade of education. It was a Man’s world so men had to be educated. This young man if he really existed at all would be a man before that age. Yes daughters were given in marriage young but I am not sure if that young. Well at at seven boys are able to be treated as more like teens are treated today not quite on their own yet but not quite children anymore either. Able to work but not quite able to live on their own yet. The age of 10 was the more adult status age. Unless they were still slaves working off the debt for their education. The upper classes actually were given higher education so they stayed home for a few more years. Another thing to note is that amulet should have symbols on it. Wow I was just viewing this article again for more references and I have to say wow. I don’t know where you got this info but it is all wrong. This sounds like some dictated tale made up years later by some conqueror who wanted the story remembered in his own image and with his own twist on what really happened back then. This all inaccurate.

  • pretty sure italian romans didnt have red hair….for being educational this article is misleading of reality. That color was only north of the alps in Gaul and England etc. It’s part of why negative stereotypes exist about red headed people today. Rome “othered” red hair as so many of those “barbarians” that wouldn’t submit to order, especially north of hardrian’s wall, were red headed. North equals more.

  • 2:10 I like how whoever did this article had NO IDEA how Roman Legions fought. WTF? THRUSTING SPEARS? This isn’t the Kingdom period, the late empire era of Constantine or the Triarii of the Punic Wars (and even then, it was JUST the Triarii that used them…). There were NO THRUSTING SPEARS in the Roman army at this time, they hadn’t been used in some 200 years and would not be used (outside maybe the foreign auxiliaries) for at least another 200. Christ, this isn’t Greece. They didn’t use phalanxes.

  • Mass-manufacturing? Were statues and statue making the Ancient World’s 1st assembly lines? Some statues were made using reusable molds for metal statues. Bronze was the most widely used, but smaller statuettes and figurines were made using brass, or copper. Jewelry was made using molds that could be reused almost indefinitely. Some of the concrete molds could be re-used but most were broken, beaten off the statue with a hammer and chisel because grease was not yet used in molds. Answer to question: No the 1st assembly line manufacturing in Ancient Rome was clothing and accessories. So it’s actually “textile manufacture” and then “weaponry.”

  • One error. Roman men could make business deals with the age of 14 and just had a special protection because of their inexperience until the age of 25. If they had no own family they could do business deals, but these were just “natural obligations”, which roughly means that the contract is valid, but they couldn’t get evicted if they don’t pay.

  • You can’t really do a comparison of “teenage-hood” as in today’s conception of “teenager” because such concept wasn’t conceived until the term and meaning was coined around 1900 by psychologist Stanley Hall (1846 – 1924), so this article it’s very informative but it can’t be compared thinking of todays teenagers. Since humanity existed and up to the last century, kids were considered kids up until coming-of-age when they were considered adults.

Pin It on Pinterest

We use cookies in order to give you the best possible experience on our website. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies.
Accept
Privacy Policy