Creative intelligence is the ability to invent or imagine solutions to problems or situations, often involving the creation of new ideas. Intelligence encompasses various skills such as logic, understanding, self-awareness, learning, emotional knowledge, reasoning, planning, and creativity. The relationship between intelligence and creativity is often debated, with significant implications for education, student development, and the arts. The threshold theory, which suggests that intelligence and creativity are related but only up to an IQ of 120, has received mixed support.
Creativity is a vital form of intelligence that drives people in many disciplines to discover something new. It can be found in every area of life, from decorating homes to understanding how cells work. Meta-analytic findings suggest a correlation between creative potential and intelligence generally around r =.20. However, creativity and intelligence are two different things. Creativity measures a person’s capacity to create/generate new ideas, while intelligence measures analytical skills and problem-solving abilities. Creativity is the highest form of intelligence because it goes beyond knowledge recall and extends into knowledge creation.
Creativity and intelligence are correlated constructs, suggesting they share a common cognitive basis. Creative intelligence is strongly associated with individuals who have a knack for storytelling, art, and developing new ideas. High ability is a component of creativity, and both intelligence and creativity are generally positively correlated. A highly intelligent person may not be creative but still possess high intelligence.
📹 2015 Personality Lecture 18: Openness – Creativity & Intelligence
Creativity and intelligence are both fundamental traits, part of Big Five Openness, and powerful determinants of innovation and …
What IQ level is creative learners?
Individuals with higher IQs tend to demonstrate greater creativity, whereas those with lower IQs may exhibit a reduced capacity for creative thinking. A recent study indicates a correlation between IQ and creativity, but this relationship is no longer evident at IQs above 120.
Can low IQ people be creative?
The 4C model of creativity suggests that everyone has the capacity to be creative in their everyday lives, regardless of their professional career. While there is a slight correlation between intelligence and creativity, the correlation is usually weakly positive. This suggests that there may be other factors that improve creativity more than intelligence, as it does not measure the strongest aspects of an individual’s intelligence. Therefore, anyone can find a field or niche where they can deliver highly creative, original, and professional work.
Who said creativity is intelligence?
Albert Einstein’s famous quote, “Creativity is Intelligence Having Fun”, emphasizes the importance of utilizing our intelligence to have fun and be creative. We often forget to tap into our intelligence when faced with challenges, but it can lead to breakthrough solutions in various aspects of life. It’s crucial to remember to have fun and utilize our intelligence to help our families today. If you’re interested in a career in intelligence, Autism Awareness, or creativity, check out the openings at BHW.
Does creativity come from intelligence?
A correlation has been identified between individuals with an IQ of 120 or above and higher creativity levels. However, this relationship is more accurately described as an overlap of skills and abilities, rather than a dependence on one another.
Is creativity measured in IQ?
Creativity is often a part of intelligence theories, but IQ tests that measure intelligence aspects that supposedly reflect creative abilities do not actually measure creativity. Recent work suggests that intelligence and creativity are more conceptually related than previously thought, and creativity offers a potential way to counter test bias. However, challenges in measuring creativity and sluggishness in the test industry mean the chances of creativity finding its way into IQ tests are small.
Can you be intelligent but not creative?
Individuals with high IQs exhibit a range of abilities in utilizing their talents. Some demonstrate creativity, while others opt for more conventional lifestyles. Some also gravitate towards intellectual pursuits. Creativity is not an inherent component of intelligence.
Is creativity a type of genius?
Genius and creative achievements are closely related, with a significant overlap. Access to content on Oxford Academic is typically provided through institutional subscriptions and purchases. Members of an institution can access content through IP-based access, which is provided across an institutional network to a range of IP addresses. This authentication occurs automatically and cannot be accessed.
To get remote access when outside the institution, users can sign in through their institution using Shibboleth/Open Athens technology, which provides a single sign-on between their institution’s website and Oxford Academic.
Are creativity and intelligence closely linked?
The threshold hypothesis is a classical theory that suggests that the relationship between creativity and intelligence may vary at different levels of intelligence. Guilford and Christensen assumed a break in the correlation data between intelligence quotient (IQ) and creativity at an IQ level of approximately 120. This hypothesis suggests that high creativity requires high intelligence or above-average intelligence, which is considered a necessary but insufficient condition for high creativity.
People with intelligence below average intelligence have little chance of being very creative, while those with intelligence above the threshold may have the potential of high creativity but it is not related to their IQ level.
Many theoretical treatments of the creativity-intelligence link exist compared to few empirical studies, with only a few systematically examined the threshold hypothesis and conclusions are inconsistent. Some studies provide evidence that does not support the threshold hypothesis, such as Runco and Albert using California Achievement Test (CAT) scores as the estimate of intelligence and Preckel et al.
Investigating the relationship between DT and fluid intelligence with a sample of 1328 German 12-16 year old students and discovering that correlations between both variables are almost equal at different IQ levels.
Recent research has also raised concerns about the threshold hypothesis, as previous studies tested the hypothesis by dividing a sample at a given level and separately estimated the correlations for lower and higher IQ groups. However, empirical studies cannot prove that the threshold should be defined as 120 IQ points. Recent studies have examined the threshold using different data analysis techniques, such as Karwowski and Gralewski, Jauk et al., and Mourgues et al., finding no threshold effect for advanced indicators such as creative achievement across the entire IQ range.
Can low IQ be creative?
The 4C model of creativity suggests that everyone has the capacity to be creative in their everyday lives, regardless of their professional career. While there is a slight correlation between intelligence and creativity, the correlation is usually weakly positive. This suggests that there may be other factors that improve creativity more than intelligence, as it does not measure the strongest aspects of an individual’s intelligence. Therefore, anyone can find a field or niche where they can deliver highly creative, original, and professional work.
Are IQ and creativity linked answers?
The passage posits that IQ tests are primarily designed to assess analytical intelligence and may not be as effective at measuring other forms of cognitive ability, such as creative intelligence.
What did Einstein say about creativity?
Albert Einstein’s famous quote, “Creativity is intelligence having fun!”, emphasizes the importance of having fun in personal life to stimulate creativity. Engaging in new activities, such as workout classes, gardening workshops, TV shows, or photography, can help you break free from your routine and let ideas flow. Using various social media channels can generate ideas, but they can be easily distracted.
To keep track of your ideas, use a platform or tool that works best for you. Additionally, varying the topics you read, such as news, articles, or books, can help your brain work differently, enhancing muscle strength, vocabulary, and overall cognitive ability.
📹 AI Creativity: Genius or Gimmick?
Are current AIs merely regurgitation algorithms producing derivative output or can they yield novelty? Actor, filmmaker, and …
Watching this in 2024. It’s great to be able to hear one of Dr Peterson’s lectures, I hope to work my way through some of these as and when time allows. I could listen to Dr Peterson for hours on end, sometimes you have to tear yourself away. Thanks for all you do, it is appreciated by millions of us around the world.
29:31 “But to not take into account the fact that you’ve been blessed at at least one level of analysis with a favorable role of the randomness dice seems to me to completely misstate the nature of the causal sequences that propel you into what’s essentially a position of privilege.” How he improvises sentences like these is beyond me.
Jordan thank you for the classes and speeches. Im a really lazy person but the talks you give madee something click in my mind and now i have some kind of hidden energy to do all the stuff i never did cause it was to much work. And i also stopped putting things off to the next day and do them right away. Thank you a lot.
I was so worried about looking unintelligent or dumb that I didn’t do anything so I wouldn’t be found out. But it’s ok to try, look clueless, fail, learn and then try again. It’s the only way to gain intelligence or be good at something, people aren’t experts on the first try. That’s what I always believed that if I wasn’t good at something right away then I didn’t want to try for fear of looking dumb. I’m still working on being ok being clueless about something in front of people in school, but that’s what I’m there for is to learn something I don’t know. I’m still wrestling with it for sure. I’m judgmental about myself and others so I fear others judgment because I know I’m capable of it towards others. I’m learning to be more compassionate and nonjudgmental because it’s tiring and anxiety provoking being worried about every little detail about myself and others faults. I’m going to keep trying.
BTW, Peterson makes an apparent mistake referring to “Martin Gardner”, a mathematics and science write who claimed to have the highest recorded IQ (according to one source), and one “Howard Gardner”, a developmental psychologist critical of traditional measures of intelligence like the IQ test, and who formulated an alternative known as “theory of multiple intelligences” (just for anyone else at home who likes to look up references in these articles)
use for a brick – friend there was this picture on the internet, how a dog befriended a brick. he was puling it places, slept with it, etc. now I am alone at home (2020 quarantine ..) and need a Willson ball like Tom Hanks alone on an island. me: “hey there wall, from now on your name is Frank. Will you be my friend Frank? i gave you a name, you will not go anywhere now, will you Frank. Stay here, with me, we can play scrabble or something.” yes, I am at home, talking to a wall, perusal psychology articles. what am I doing with my life.
Dr. Peterson gets my vote. I’ve listened to all his posted articles. I love the way some people are so quick to judge when they hear something they don’t like. I hate political correctness. And those few who genuinely speak their truths are always politically incorrect. Jesus was politically incorrect. So afraid are they of hurting people’s feelings; I say let their feeling be hurt. If anything I say offends you, that means I have power and control of your emotions. Nobody controls my emotions. That doesn’t mean I don’t get angry when there is cause to be angry, but my anger is something YOU feel. A FORCE! About offences, Jesus said, “The offence is IN YOU! And since it is in you, I can pull it out of you if I want to; and, no, I don’t even need a reason. Comedians do it all the time, and get paid for it. Comedians are Prophets with a humorous side. A Prophet, or Poet, simply calls it as he sees it, and people either laugh or cry or get angry. Madison Avenue does it every second of the day. The politicians pull it out of you to divide you from your fellow Homo Sapiens. Homo Sapiens are not Human Beings. Homo Sapiens are simply a field of possibilities, one of which is to grow into Conscious Human Beings of Light, which is a word for Consciousness. “You are the light of the world.” Forget the words I use. What’s the old saying? It’s not what you say, but how you say it? If I am writing from a Conscious Source, then this writing would be what the Forth Way calls a ‘B’ Influence. ‘A’ Influences are the influences of ordinary every day life.
I learn’t nothing until i passed beyond those school gates for the last time. I was definitely one of Jordan Peterson’s “day-dreaming” creatives…so he’s bang on the money in that area. The school year pupils before me left(mostly with a job), without qualifications. The year i left(1 year later..with qualifications…one or two in Maths and English) everybody i knew walked pretty much straight into an unemployment queue. Was it a disadvantage? Sure and massively to begin with, eventually. As we had ZERO money… but we had something of way more value for the long term…TIME TO THINK…and observe…total freedom. I went on to run two businesses. There were no Business Studies offered to me at school. I joined a small eye-opener of a Business course at 20(and the right inspirational tutor)..and ran my first business at 21 in Mobile Catering…what a grounding. Learning things parrot-fashion only works for one section of children. The rest were totally abandoned in my day and for the record, the abandoned ones were drawn naturally to business..mainly because they couldn’t get jobs due to not being able to produce qualifications, due to not being able to pass “parrot-fashion” exams….oh, the irony. Come to think about it, when i went to some grotty school re-union about twenty years after we left, it became very noticeable that the Business runners ended up drifting together in that hall by the end of the evening. The rest, mainly seemed really bored or boring to be around. Most told me they were in jobs the hated.
My mother had a friend who was one of the most amazing human beings that I’ve ever known. She has an IQ of 85. She’s barely literate. She writes and spells about the same as your average fourth grader. But she’s the most conscientious people I’ve ever met in my life. She has a work ethic like no one else. It took a little more care to teach her a job, but once she had it down, she worked like a machine. (She’s retired now) Her house is orderly and immaculate. She worked lots of jobs and she quickly became the MVP. She had a job at at gas station for awhile and the shelves were perfectly stocked, the bathrooms were immaculate, and the windows practically sparkled after her shift was done. She never stopped, never took a break. She just moved through the checklist then continued to clean after that was done. She was a faithful wife and a loving mom. A wonderful, loyal friend. She’s in her 70’s now and a widow and I’d say that she’s had a very successful life. One of her grandsons moved to China to teach English and she has faithfully sent him a letter, a small gift, and a bit of money every week. He’s been there for over a decade and she hasn’t missed a week. He adores her above all others and looks forward to her little notes and presents. I’ve known some brilliant people who’ve led ruinous, short lives. She’s made me reassess the definition of the word ‘success.’ We’re all told to reach for the brass ring, but what’s wrong with a nice, steady life with lots of dedicated love? Why isn’t that enough for most of us?
Hello Lobsters. I am conducting a survey based on my anecdotal experience. It is in regard to a novel I am writing. I would like to collect data. How do you rate your emotional state while washing dishes? 1 – Annoyed. 2 – Mildly agitated. 3 – Cool as you like. 4 – Easy like Sunday Morning. 5 -Existential dread Thank you.
10-12 usages, depending on definition of “new usage” for the task at the end. Bookrest, paperweight, counter weight when weighing or lifting things, using it to put things on so things are higher from table/ground, musical instrument, door stop, model to shape self-made gift boxes around, foot rest, as a ruler when drawing, stabilizer for furniture.
Lol! Why is it that Jordan Peterson is a professor of clinical psychology and a public intellectual, and I failed a simple part-time gardening job and failed my CSEs at school, and failed an English CSE at college? I suppose that there are clever people than me in this world. Ah well, I’ll never be a Harvard Graduate, so f**king what?! Lol! 1:05:10.
Interesting! Fluid intelligence is a good predictor of how fast one is able to learn something, however it does not say much about how good one will become at it. Could the Conscientiousness trait be a good predictor to the latter? If so, someone scoring high in IQ and high Conscientiousness would be unstoppable!
Thank you for giving access to your lectures. Access to information via the Internet changed my life and your lectures have helped me in abundance. One thing about IQ tests I feel might be negative (if you want to look at it that way), is that there are many people in the world without access to information; moreover many people aren’t even taught how to effectively evaluate information to grow their understanding capabilities. I grew up in a situation where I faced this adversity and had to teach myself pretty much most of the fundamental things I needed to know to live a meaningful life and to rid myself of inherited pathology. It’s an adversity I still face, however I feel lucky I have the means to face it. I don’t think that makes me exceptional in any way from anyone else; simply that I am fortunate to have the means to do so. The question I would therefore ask is: is IQ basically just differentiating people with access to information and the knowledge of how to properly evaluate that information, from the people who do not? If so, doesn’t it largely highlight the gap of wealth disparity since poverty contributes towards lack of opportunity in general but specifically in this case lack of opportunity to be educated by high quality intellectuals? How do we determine what differentiates a person with really good understanding from a person with poor understanding? In other words, isn’t every individual capable of pretty much the same things through specific nurture? If equal opportunity truly existed, then wouldn’t peoples IQ have very little variation?
As a “sufferer” of high IQ, how I like to refer it in my daily life, I’m saddened, that I never had teachers like you. Hopefully my new study will be better. Society sucks, I can’t even openly talk about it with most people, without them thinking I’m arrogant or whatever, while I do struggle a lot. Thanks for the article, and thank you for making it free of charge!
I’d be super curious if the results of the brick test would change if it was done anonymously. So many people have issues with social anxiety/judgement/shyness, and I could imagine being smart, these kids would know there’s a good chance their uses for a brick would be analyzed publicly. I’d be willing to bet that an anonymous test would yield far more uses, and far more bizarre/creative uses at that from many of the students more prone to shyness/introversion/social anxiety. I know the likelihood of public analysis would have affected my mental “looseness”! 😂
Critical point here. Intelligence tops out at 20. Reading is key. So absorb as much as possible by 20, how many people, particularly parents, are aware of this? Exercise is important. Walking used to be natural, particularly barefoot, for many. Also gut bacteria. Too bad JP wasn’t aware of this at the time of this lecture because it is clear here he is still on pop drinks and carbs here. Good thing that his IQ is high, had some grey matter to destroy there and still be far ahead of everyone.
What about factors external to the IQ-test, that which one could call the (psychological and otherwise) situation of the test? It’s a little surprising that a psychologist doesn’t take those into account at all. Say susceptibility to pressure. How much in a deviation from the norm in an IQ-test is due to differences in that and how much of it is an actual difference in computational ability? There’s a myriad of “effects” that affect the actualization of cognitive abilities in toto, let alone those measured by an IQ-test. Pinocchio is a TEXT first, written by Collodi. It’s not only a movie.
Aptitude or attitude, point any blind man in the right direction and he still stumbles and falls . Seldom do we ever reach the unmovable wall, the limits of our Creative mind are never immediately rewarded. An approval seeking disposition is absolutely the most defeating attitude for creative problem solving .
I had an I Q test at age 13 said I would not do well at all and finish school education.So wrong my brain had not even fully developed yet I got 3 Diplomas Read a lot and got te best business idea out of 66 people and set a goal to be manageress of a company and did that to . consistence is key as well as goal setting despite what people say forget about them.They are not you.
Isn’t conscientiousness something almost as much out of personal control as iq? It is really hard to become more conscientious when you are not. Even though you know that you have to do it, that fact is not enough to motivate you to take action. However our language is kinda bad at explaing this concept. Like, hey you just need to try harder! Yeah, it’s just that you can’t.
Genius is not born but made. I know children who are at 9 years old and got full marks on the physics and math exams taken by 18 years old, and these same children know something like more than 4 languages, so you might think that they are a piece of genius but they are not genius at all. If you see the amount of persistent work they do, you will immediately understand that geniuses are made.
Dr. Peterson, just before the 45-minute mark of this article you mention only knowing one person who has been able to regulate themselves well in the absence of social structure. You mentioned this person was very talented and very intelligent. Who is this person, how did they find themselves in this position in their life, and how did you come to observe it?
What is the obsession with this testing and measuring? Why do I have to be reduced to test score a mere number which is simply an abstraction? That only makes some individuals more expendable since the importance of knowing who, whom are the smartest in the land. If I were brilliant I wouldn’t want to be used by others; besides they now achieve things by group effort. Now you have more books being written collectively as with software development as opposed the old ways of the solo .
So, is the Multiple Intelligences theory debunked? From the lecture, this theory is just a bunch of new unnecessary terms, since the Big-5 psychological traits plus the G-factor are already in place and have been doing a great job in accounting for skills and abilities. It is not clear what the heck are talents then. How do talents fit in this scenario?
It’s not all there is to IQ. By a long shot. Food, environment, life habits, meditation. If those things change for someone the real IQ latent within them will come out. Many don’t hold composure well. And you could technically figure that into IQ in terms of mental focus but for those same people, in real world applications outside of a paper/written test or in the streets with similar problems people don’t even see, they do great. There are lots of problems with IQ tests and the problem itself is the medium mixed with preparation. IQ is predicated on the fact it’s static & always comes out the same barring small changes. But no. That’s not true.
41:55 “What are you going to do about the people without the cognitive ability…the niche…that everybody will pay for…?” When people had horses, And we transitioned to cars, How was anybody going to be able to adapt to the mechanical care versus the animalistic care of the good/service of transportation, despite being COMPLETELY unfamiliar? Part of structuring labor, with regards to manufacturing or anything, is creating different sets and subsets of skills, within a process, USING the LABOR you ACTUALLY have available in the market. Labor can move up in responsibility, it can settle down, it can begin aggregating skills (blue collar and white collar) to define a VERY NEW and VERY SPECIFIC niche laborer. Look at the divide between the production FLOOR and the OFFICE. Having or developing an adequate intermediary between the two (a niche laborer) is how you succeed in this or any climate. Needs evolve. Labor evolves. Structure evolves. All because of an IMMEDIATE NEED, that EVERYONE HAS to RESPOND to.
At some point, Dr Peterson said there are evidence that people scoring higher in Openness tend to be more suited to the Humanities, while people scoring higher in IQ are more to the Sciences. Is this the same as saying that the average IQ score of science-like people is higher than humanities-like people and the average Openness score of science-like people is lower than humanities-like people?
Great! Here I’ve got the response for a question I have for some time: what’s the relationship between Fluid and Crystallized Intelligences? The Fluid intelligence is the programmer, whilst the Crystallized intelligence is the product, so that it is possible to infer something about the level of the Fluid intelligence from the produced Crystallized intelligence, like sampling factual knowledge (Crystalized Intelligence) is the way most admission exams infer one’s Fluid Intelligence. Can we reframe this in a propositional logic statement? IF (High Crystallized Intelligence) THEN (High Fluid Intelligence)? Put in another words, is it possible someone having High Crystallized Intelligence, while being low in Fluid Intelligence (a false positive)?
Dr. Peterson in a different lecture you mentioned how constraints can foster creativity…. It was previously very difficult to get quality sound…even moreso recordings with inexpensive equipment…it took huge effort to get a simply acceptable sound for a guitar or piano…now every good sound is available at a click so almost everything is built from presets…. and music now sucks…… I have observed better compositions coming from instruments that are flawed..
Peterson’s synops of the jobs that the IQ supports and the jobs that are not available now due to technology. Where I grew up in the south (USA) ALOT of people worked in textile mills. Those jobs are gone… forever. A plant that would employ 500 is now run by 4 people. 2 people in the office and 2 to turn the lights on and drive forklift and load the trucks. Maybe the Amish and the luddites had it right?
So as a high (ish) IQ person high (ish) in conscientiousness who struggled most of his adult life, I would put a plug in for ADHD testing and possibly interventions (including medication) for those who know they are smart but struggle to find traction. I have found it very helpful to help me function in the world. I know that is not what Dr. Jordan would advocate, but I find that it has helped me. I. also happen to be pretty high in agreeableness, which lead me to Jung which lead me to these lectures. I think Dr. Peterson is a very good lecturer, a good human being. Politically, I probably disagree with 3/4 of what he seems to advocate these days. However, I have learned alot of helpful things and appreciate the posting.
28:07 To me, this is an essential part of this lecture, and I almost disagree with it. When saying “there MIGHT be something like actual differencies in ability that are important and ineradicable”, I feel like the “might” should have been more stressed on. This is because it infers a lot, and it is also a matter of point of view. If intelligence is taken as the ability to learn/understand fast/well anything, as opposed to having talent in specific areas, which I agree depends on personality, then, the term “ineradicable” should be more explained. It should be more explained not for political purpose, but to actually explain what intelligence depends on. As far as I know (and I maybe wrong), the brain roughtly works like neural networks, and as such, intelligence (defined above) depends on 2 things: The average number of connections between neurons in someone’s brain, as well as the model created by these neurons. In other words, when training the brain to learn something new, the ability to do that will depends on the previous model in the brain, as well as the number of neurons connections. Now, I can explain my problem with “ineradicable differencies”. If the number of neurons connection is biologically defined, which I don’t know, but don’t think it is, then, it is indeed ineradicable for an individual. This is a very dangerous idea as it could lead to WWII type of thought. On the other hand the model created in the brain depends on the data the brain has been provided, and how well these data were processed.
Canadien ethics seems to have failed his openness. LOL. THERES A certain point where everyone realizes that openness doesnt mean acceptance or approval otherwise youd have no boundaries or a mind of your own. You might even say he was accepting but not approving which is another way of dealing with authoritarian constructs that may or may not make sense for the station and timing of your life. Ditto his suggestion on some topics. But one more comment on O.I.C. Harvey Weinstein seems to have been high on all 3 but low on ethics. What goes up may make something else go down.
I am at his lecture and have no brick and he asks me how many uses I could think of for a brick. I should have a brick if I need one and since I don’t have one I do not need one. No use at the moment for a brick. Should I ever be honored to meet Mr. Peterson I pray I know in advance so I can have a brick handy to hand him. When he asks why I gave him a brick. I will say because you have many uses for the brick and I knew of your need. Blessings, respect, and love to all without prejudice.
I been hurt and off work from 2018 I never had a life of school and children hood and I firmly believe in one has too set goals to make sure one has meaning and self respect for one even if one not working on getting myself ready to go back too the work force. I’m happy that I lucky too have the able too gain information and understanding in may fields as I keep gaining knowledge I found new skills. It is year 2022 … and I hope the government can get fixed too a standard of professional that we are deeply missing atm. As for Covid too food and gasoline. What would it take for people too understand that groups and others government is overwhelmed people with too much data on that how would help others to dig though data to gain the right information from bs data???
There’s a significant amount of interpretations here, rather than facts from JP here. I like him, and he can be intelligent, perceptive and thought-provoking, but his hypocrisy, inaccuracies, lack of material, bias, insults, verbosity and transparently clear opinions just cancel this whole talk out. I could totally pull this apart and criticise almost everything he states here, but I have a life to live. I would just encourage people to take what he says with a grain of salt
I pray they hoped for one thing with making you school in 2023 but get this happiness with this coming of foods for your waiting to receive! I pray that overflow blesses you new College and they don’t take away your name on the advertisements and the college as they have done for Ravi Zacharias because like you, he was my only influence of Interest to entice the thought of going that place but My stomach turned when he was no longer able to defend his name in both offence against his whole family and him out. Truth is facts don’t care about your feelings and God will write them on and in who he chooses. Even so, Justice is justified of all her children just as wisdom is justified of all the children. Stay strong Sir Child of God! ❤ may that truth come because it will only bring me closer to the goodnews and that peace to come drawn out. I pray you Well and fruits be blessed! Be strong and courageous and keep treating people as sovereign encounters! If the system somehow arranged our meetings next to one another… it is one of those delightful thoughts of meetings. Make it what you make it in that in which it is. Stay humble because now your like me, nope you have to listen and wait to speak. That can be hard! HAVE A BLESSING OF IT! ❤
That bomb he drops at the end, indicating that all the students in the class would soon be the target of all policies enforcing equality across all standards of empirical measure and face illegal hiring situations wherein the unmeasurable spiritual (conscientious) positive defining attributes have no correlation to testable and therefore legally allowable measures. You guys are on the chopping block of this upcoming “privileged” purging. “Those that don’t have will” judge and take from those that do have, rather than simply (or through trial and difficulty) earn it for themselves. He just drops it casually as if he’s rambling himself as he draws to the end of class. Nope. He was just setting up the last line. Wow.
I’m disabled, been in a wheelchair for since I was 16 and I’m 50 so physical exercise is limited for me. I think I’m fairly intelligent though and I exercises my brain often. Not as brilliant as this man, I wonder if these students realize how blessed they are, I know I’m blessed to be able to watch his articles
33:00 Interviews 44:00 UBI – “Human beings are pretty social and we’re pretty altruistic in some weird manner. It doesn’t seem to me that people can live a life thats acceptable if all they is enforced leisure. So, maybe that will be wrong..If you provided people with a base salary maybe theyd figure out what to do in their spare time. I doubt it. I think its very difficult for people to regulate themselves in the absence of a certain minimum of social structuring and guidance. I’ve seen very very few people who can conjure that up on their own and manage that it for extensive periods of time. I think I’ve only met 1 person in my life who can manage that, and that particular person has a very large array of talents and is extremely intelligent”
Uses: pumice stone, throw to injure or murder, drown like in a witch trial, play spin the bootle if u get it on the right surface, to hold up books, door stopper, coaster/place mat, to build obviously lol (took me a while to get to that), anchor something in a lake maybe (perhaps to similar to drowning), draw like chalk, stool or step, instrument albeit not a very good one, foot rest, ruler. Didn’t get paperweight actually 😂
In this interview: “2015 Personality Lecture 18: Openness – Creativity & Intelligence”, youtube.com/watch?v=P6rm0LrO9vU JP notes that our educational system was specifically designed to turn out obedient factory workers, red brick buildings constructed on the factory plan, rank and file desk arrangement symbolizing the intent, hierarchies of power and control, etc. And he notes that such a system is bound to have considerable inertia. He then criticizes its obedient graduates for failing to adapt this educational behemoth to the sudden disappearance of factories. On top of which we must now deal with the even more rapid rise of our species nervous system, cell phone synapses, internet axons, google memories and the widespread demise of book reading. Easy to imagine the cult of individuality will soon look very much like cancer. Interesting times are upon us, end times maybe.
Just a thought relating to article games, As a child of 6-11years I was always terrible at hitting balls accurately for baseball and teeball. Then after a few years of playing article games- I found myself very much able to hit balls (accurately timing the swing and squarely hitting the ball) this caught me off guard from 12 onwards – interesting considering I had no practice hitting balls and was not much of a sports person – regularly playing in physical space. But everytime I was put in a position to hit a ball – I was dead on – and it was repeatable. Not sure exactly what article games contributed to this – but I expect it was probably due to xwing (combat flight simulator) and super Mario kart (a racing game) – two games I became adept at that time and two games involve accurate hand eye coordination and a strong concept of 3 dimensional space .
Something that’s always interested me. You pursue higher education to obtain better skills for a career. Where you will undoubtedly work for someone who is nowhere near as educated as you. There are many successful entrepreneurs that failed school and tested low on IQ exams. It makes you think about the relevance of IQ. Maybe we should be focused on matching people to skill sets that fit their abilities.
Agree with gist of Harry Lo’s observation. Ethics training is one of those woolly academic concepts, like life/work balance or encouraging Torres Strait Islanders and Aborigines to apply for academic positions (in the Australian system). In my own experience I’ve seen professors that have blatantly used their positions of institutional power to obtain and maintain sexual relationships with female students and post-docs and, on the other hand, have seen a number of female academics that have pursued relationships with profs to further their careers. Academe no doubt is a hothouse for intelligent people but in terms of ethics, I doubt academics are any more ethical than the extramural population. I wonder if any social psychologist have looked into this?
So I’ve been thinking about this while going through some of your lectures and podcasts and I’m curious. The ability to “abstract” let’s say could be similar to the function of an algorithm, you put in information and it filters out a certain pattern. Which I think is an interesting query considering that would fundamentally suggest human brains are a bundle of perpetually self correcting algorithms.
1:16:55 anyone else did it as well? I scored 32 which I’m very proud of 🙂 sword smash shilling shell sphere stratosphere stadium stand Stan story sternum streptococcus song sulfur sun shop Shoppen salt sandwich string stairs strategy skeptical stop start sweet sharp sleek sleep separate significant situation
I think he is wrong in regards to the validity of the I.Q. test he is referring to. There are many more intellectual factors that should be incorporated to allow a more broad opportunity to define ones intelligence. A fixed measurement which is entirely confined and capped in regards to math itself should never and will never be an accurate measurement of the human brain.
ok i must be honest…you have one minute…. i thought i can smash that coke bottle in two (1st what came up) and my mind couldn’t stop thinking of all sorts of effects randomly it would have after it, i recon that is more of a measurement of a creative mind than the number of ideas in a sort of order you can come up with after that question has been asked.
Jordan often claims that working memory is almost indistinguishable from intelligence however I am dyslexic and have an abnormal IQ distribution. My verbal IQ is in the 120’s but my working memory is 83. pretty low. I find it incredibly hard to follow instructions and do even simple maths yet have no problem following complex lectures on subjects like astrophysics? I think I am very good at understanding concepts but am an incredibly un-practical and non-quantitative thinker. Which one of these quality’s (verbal or working memory) is considered the higher order “intelligence”? I would assume it to be verbal IQ as this is the form of cognition that allows us to understand concepts and that other animals barley have. Many animals have far more powerful working memory’s than humans yet have no real intellect so I don’t really understand why he says “its basically the same as intelligence”?
now i have to donate to ask the Dr if he thinks that the taking of drugs changes the way persons use there learning center in the brain as they might imagine words differently. And if the use is prolonged would that train the different uptake in information to be permanent to after seizing of the uptake. a underachieving smart person 🙁
Some quick points left out- You can’t talk about what IQ 100 years ago meant for performance and apply it to today, IQ is a score that is normalized so the average is always a hundred, this normalization has consistently moved the distribution to the right. If you got an 80 on An IQ test today it would be in spitting distance of 100 back in the 1920s. Also, there were some attempts by the military to use lower IQ recruits, though giving them a task other than cleaning did not turn out well. Low IQ workers can be trained to complete tasks so long as those tasks stay relatively the same(which robots are also very good at). Overall great lecture.
yesterday i watched a article,i think it was this lecture and after some thought i wanted to comment, dr peterson mentioned he does not support a basic income which ultimately i would not support because i think it is more medicating a symptom of a higher issue which has to do with economic structure. but with the current circumstance that is an unemployment rate of 5 to 10% there needs to be something more then welfare or basic income in place that can meet the measurement of the wound,if a economy cant meet the needs of 5 or 10% of the population thats an issue, i think a lot of small time crime is a sure thing if every other option outside the legal market is a crime and to build a justice system economy that depends on this crime just ensures the crime will continue,i think welfare is basic income and if you take that away the only other option is loosening up regulations and local laws that keep people pinned in this situation,people should have the right to share land without all the gov interference there is,what it comes down to is currently all the laws from fed to local funnel our money to these huge companies which forces us by law to spend all this money thats not needed other than to maintain these huge corporate businesses, i think local market development and putting people in a situation where you have to work or die is the only way to build work ethic .really we should be looking at the people who are juiced up on credit like we look at those who are on welfare,its these people who have the bottom of the economy falling out causing inflation killing the value of the currency or living standard .
Jordan, what do you think about the components of IQ tests that test things like crystallized intelligence (like word -repertoir, or questions about ancient egypt) or perceptual speed? I study psychology and have administered the WAIS 4 test. My own “archetypal” definition of intelligence is basicaly: the ability to DEDUCE. Yet in the WAIS 4 there are plenty of parts that test said things, which I find stupid because they are not really testing what I believe should be regarded as intelligence, besides they do not take into account cultural factors (why would someone from China know anything about french 17th century kings for instance…). Why not only have formal abstract tasks like mathematics and patterns?
If “creativity” is defined by how many books have I published – then this is a wrong definition. Published – means sometimes random judgment of one publisher, marketing and all this work to convince consumer that he should buy. How many creative people will never be published – and how many mediocre writers will be!
Is it possible that the explanation for the fact the highest IQ scores are held by people being higher in Openness to New Experiences (who are not burdened by belief system) is that they simply are not “taken by surprise” by seemingly random questions on a test ? I mean, each question seems to have no correlation with the one preceding it. So maybe (MAYBE) this trait of adaptability and a capacity for change in the face of the unknown (in this case, many unknown and unpredictable surprise questions) is at the advantage the people functioning this way the most. And maybe the people with a lower score in Openness to Exp. simply have a more crystallised type of intelligence and simply need more time to adapt to the novelty of each question. Maybe it means destroying their world and put the pieces back together again (that’s what rearranging a belief system feels like I suppose). What do you think ?
A 1000 people? Where from? What’s their socioeconomic background? What kind of intelligence? Is correlation causation now? Who sets normal for Stern’s ‘mental age?’ Regression requires scores above .08 for a sensible correlation > how is 0.4 to 0.5 relevant or reliable? How accurate and precise are these IQ tests if values fluctuate +/- 20 points from genius to normal each time one takes these tests? Grades are good indicator to hard work? Adjust for the assumption that ‘smart people’ value grades…see C students owning companies that B students manage and front-line, A students work at…How do IQ tests measure grit, which may be valuable than G.P.A. for some? I guess Ph.Ds are dumb now since many are janitors.
Peterson said that working memory is basically indistinguishable from intelligence in many ways. When I took my IQ test about a decade ago my working memory was about 130 while my overall IQ was 95. I’ve never been able to quite figure out the relationship between these two scores and what they imply.
42:45 Good question on UBI. Had the same question in mind. I agree with Peterson. I dont’ think the majority are good at finding things to do, it’s a very hard thing. But I do think it will work if we can work out ways to make it easier to be productive. School really is outdated at this point in doing what it’s supposed to — guiding us and teaching. If we can create alternatives to school, or enough alternatives, UBI may be the utopia we wish for. UBI is also not very socialistic, it’s *very*, very capitalistic. Taxes right now is something the government control, they control how the cash get distributed. UBI on the other hand, is saying that the individual controls that, which is more towards capitalism if anything.