Social skills are not innate but are learned from birth and from others. While some people believe that children are born with an impulse to be social, research and real-world evidence suggest otherwise. Social skills are learned from birth and from others, with empathy, kindness, lying, shyness, and peer influence being the biggest influences on children’s development.
IQ is influenced by various factors, including genes, environment, and chance. Genetic studies have identified some genes associated with brainpower, while nutrition and health also play a role in brainpower. Human beings are naturally social, and to survive from a newborn, we need to form relationships. However, it is not believed that children are born with an impulse to be social.
Social skills are learned from birth and from others, and they begin to develop as soon as we become aware of other people. As children and adults, we continue to learn and use these skills throughout our lives. People aren’t generally born with every social grace, but some take to it like fish to water, while others have some natural talent and develop what they lack.
Growing evidence suggests that even newborns may be inherently prosocial, showing a keen interest in helping, sharing, and comforting others. Social skills are learned from birth and have to be learned from others. Children communicate from birth, and social interaction is a key purpose of language learning. As they grow up, they must learn that other people’s needs and wishes matter as well, and they must discover how to become sociable beings and empathize with others.
📹 Are Social Skills Something You’re Born With or Made? (TTC 009)
I’ve always admired people with excellent social skills and I constantly seek ways to improve mine. However, I do notice that not …
Is it possible to be born without a talent?
The science of skill acquisition has been the focus of recent studies and books, revealing that we are born with very few natural talents and skills. Excellence is borne not of any particular innate ability, but of practice. In high school, the author picked up playing the guitar, which was a natural progression from father to son. After learning tablature, they started learning songs they wanted to play. After six years of practice, they were pretty good.
However, they hit a plateau of talent, which they knew they couldn’t exceed. Their abilities extended to playing all major chords, barre chords, and a few simple licks, with no soloing or improvising. This level of proficiency remained for six years, until they started touring. The key to success lies in practice and dedication to one’s passion.
Are you born with social skills?
In the first two years of life, babies develop a variety of social skills, including communication, empathy, sharing, cooperation, and problem-solving. These skills are crucial for their development and can be influenced by caregivers. Caregivers should pay attention to their baby’s cues, engage in social interactions, and play with them. They should also model good social behavior, such as using “pleases and thank yous” consistently. This helps the baby understand and respond to others’ emotions, and encourages them to comfort those who are upset.
Encouraging cooperation is another important aspect of social skills development. Caregivers can play games that require cooperation, such as pat-a-cake or peek-a-boo, to encourage cooperation. By doing so, caregivers can help their baby develop these skills and create a supportive environment that encourages positive social experiences. By following these tips, caregivers can help their babies develop essential social skills and foster a positive environment for their children.
Why do I have zero social skills?
A sheltered childhood can lead to social issues in adults, as they may not have had the opportunity to practice social skills with others or learn helpful lessons when exposed to the wider world. Being an only child can also contribute to social difficulties later in life. Parents who are socially awkward and anxious may restrict their children’s activities to protect them from the scary social world or avoid socializing.
Moving around too much as a child can also be a factor in social issues. Some children adapt well to constant new experiences, while others struggle with constant newness and the need to make new friends. This can amplify existing vulnerabilities and make it difficult for children to adapt to the world.
Can you develop your social skills?
To improve social skills, find resources such as classes, books, podcasts, and tools on and offline. Focus on specific topics like body language, networking, and active listening to practice and improve your skills. Stay updated on current events and trends to keep conversations professional and friendly. Subscribing to local news alerts or industry-specific newsletters can provide direct content. Avoid controversial topics like politics or religion to maintain a professional tone.
Social skills can include a mixture of different skill sets, especially in the workplace. Effective communication is crucial in careers requiring regular contact with clients and customers. Four of the most in-demand workplace social skills include:
- Listening
- Listening actively
- Listening actively
- Listening actively
- Listening actively
- Listening actively
- Listening actively
- Listening actively
- Listening actively
- Listening actively.
Is it OK to lack social skills?
The lack of social skills can significantly affect an individual’s mental and emotional well-being, leading to increased stress, anxiety, and low self-esteem. Developmental factors, such as limited socialization opportunities or traumatic events, can impact social development, while genetic predispositions can also influence an individual’s ability to acquire and apply social skills. Environmental factors, such as limited exposure to diverse social settings or isolation from peers, can also hinder the acquisition of social skills. Negative peer influences, such as bullying or social exclusion, can also contribute to social skill deficits.
Does social skills come naturally?
Social skills are often challenging for individuals with ADHD, autism spectrum disorder, and other neurodivergent disorders. They may experience anxiety, communication difficulties, difficulty understanding one’s own thoughts and feelings, difficulty interpreting body language, and difficulty recognizing different perspectives. These individuals may also struggle with problem-solving skills, building rapport, and maintaining accountability. Collaboration and support are essential to help these individuals overcome these challenges and improve their confidence and competence in social situations.
Are we born with skill or is it learned?
Talent is a natural ability to see or do something in a certain way, which can be learned and developed over time. Skill, on the other hand, is something that has been learned and developed over time and is something that one desires to master. The quote “desire is more important than talent” highlights the importance of tapping into one’s natural aptitudes. Talent exists in people, and the more one tunes into their desires and passions, the more they will tap into their natural aptitudes.
For years, the author felt they didn’t have any talent, but it was only when they moved towards what they were passionate about and curious about that they began to see their superpowers come through. They believe that everything they’ve discovered about themselves has come from hard work and learning.
Why am I smart but I lack social skills?
The common stereotype that highly intelligent people lack social skills is more likely a myth than an informative one. Recent research indicates that smarter people tend to be better at accurately interpreting and responding to social and emotional cues of others. By using objective data, overcoming biases, communicating better, and recognizing the importance of different forms of intelligence, organizations and their people stand a much better chance of success.
This belief has persisted for centuries, and many people believe that those who are smart or highly intelligent tend to be lost at sea in terms of social skills. This stereotype has persisted for centuries, and it is the ubiquitousness of this stereotype that motivates the author to write on this subject. Recent research has indicated that this belief is more likely a myth than an informative and explanatory stereotype.
In this article, the author provides compelling research dispelling this myth and explains why holding onto this debunked stereotype could be costly in the end.
Why did I never learn social skills?
The acquisition of social skills may prove to be a significant challenge for an individual who was not exposed to traditional group dynamics during their formative years, who is grappling with mental health issues such as anxiety or depression, or who lacks positive role models during their childhood.
Is IQ related to social skills?
The study found a significant relationship between IQ and social intelligence, specifically social consciousness, at a significance level of 0. 05. This connection allows for the connection between social intelligence and general psychometric intelligence. The complexity and versatility of intelligence as a psychological phenomenon have led to a variety of approaches and empirical data. However, there are still concerns about the essence of intelligence and its types, which continue to spark disagreements among scientists.
What talents are passed down genetically?
Genetic factors play a significant role in influencing aptitude and talent in various fields, including intelligence, creativity, and athleticism. These factors can also influence traits like analytical and critical thinking, communication, and research skills. From kindergarten to compulsory schooling, there is a strong genetic component to differences in students’ academic performance. Hereditary characteristics may account for approximately 62% of individual differences in GCSE results in the UK. Analytical ability is essential for incorporating background knowledge into conclusions, interpreting information, and recognizing and addressing complex challenges in a timely manner.
📹 Are people born smart? | Richard Haier and Lex Fridman
GUEST BIO: Richard Haier is a psychologist specializing in the science of human intelligence. PODCAST INFO: Podcast website: …
I always felt extremely unintelligent during my school days. When I got to College a fire of motivation seeped through my brain and radically changed my input of information thus creating a completely new individual. Motivation, environment, consistency, and reading changed my whole perspective and output. Morality and intelligence on the other hand are 2 completely different things
Reading a lot at an early age cultivates practical and creative thinking and you consciously and subconsciously end up absorbing a variety of info and perspective outside of yourself. If there’s one brain hack to becoming more intellectual than you otherwise would have been, it’s reading, regardless of being born with superior intelligence or not
As someone who grew up with a lot of smart people around him from doctors to phds and friends who work for boeing, NASA, tech giants, founders, Feds etc. Genetics play a huge role but even the dumbest people can become experts in subjects if they are use to working hard and staying committed. Parenting and working hard in younger age is very important, those habbits and hobbies carry forward rest of your lives. I had adhd, I did good and bad at school/uni depending on motivation at the time but still struggle with my working habbits, I doubt would have ever completed my uni if my parents weren’t so supportive and pushy. I see people who have habbit of working hard and stay committed do well off. I think some Intelligence is innate but rest is built up by environment, obviously some cases are outliers.
Absolutely. There were some folks in my calculus class who could grasp a subject in a single session. They wouldn’t even need to study much. I’d study all night trying to pass the class. They’d get an A and I’d get an c if I was lucky. However I was always the class presenter and communicator, as they didn’t like that aspect of presenting a project. Sure enough I ended up as the sales engineer, and they ended up as the senior developers haha.
His response doesn’t get rid of the problem. It’s true that intelligent people aren’t necessarily kind, honest or likeable. But intelligence doesn’t negate these qualities either. You could, in principle, have a person who is incredibly intelligent, kind, honest and likeable. In that case, is that person better than others?
I went to MIT and I never really had to try that much in school, what I noticed when I was there was that the MAJORITY of people there were not extraordinarily naturally intelligent, they just worked their ass off. Most people with high natural intelligence never learn how to work head, and once you get to a certain point (probably around high school for most) hard work means far more than natural intellect.
Intelligence is just another quantifiable trait in humans like height, strength, etc. I liked when Richard said that more intelligence is better but more intelligence doesn’t make you a better human being. It just so happens that the era in which we live values (needs) intelligence more. Thousands of years ago, physical strength was probably a more useful trait.
This topic reminds me of experiences that myself and many, many others experience during early and middle childhood years. Very many people give accounts of having a very easy time absorbing information at an early age; reading at a college level or above before their teens, exceptional understanding of mathematics, artistically inclined, very logical, etc. Of course, in these anecdotal accounts, all of this is either lost or fails to advanced past a certain plateau during the latter stages of pubescence. Whether this is “genetic” or “conditioned” intelligence, clearly things can change rather easily depending on your environment. For the record, I’m not implying that I, nor any of the others that may have had this experience, are geniuses or what have you.
Some are certainly born much smarter than others. But a brilliant dog is much easier to train than a dull one. And an Evil genius is merely more efficient at being Bad than a less precise mind. The problem lies in the assumption that greater intelligence, by itself, equates to ‘better’ outcomes for oneself or others. Intelligence alone certainly fails that test. It’s one factor, among many variables in a sea of shifting consequences. And what good is any trait, if not to serve better outcomes?
I don’t see how this says anything about the U.S. Constitution. Some of The Founders themselves were pretty racist, but they wanted to create a society where inequalities are not used as an excuse to persecute or marginalize. For instance, I see people scream “they’re violating my FREE SPEECH”. Should I tell them they’re just stupid and shouldn’t be afforded this right? Lex is being weird there.
I have always been quite a bit smarter than those around me, but I’m not entirely convinced this is due to some kind of genetic advantage I inherited from my parents, neither of which can think on my level if I’m being brutally honest. I was the kid that grew up playing chess, complex demanding article games, card games… anything that pushed and stretched my brain I found myself enamoured with and put A LOT of time into getting better at. Could it not be that the thousands of hours of challenging my mind in such a way, is what moulded and shaped my mind into becoming more cognitively capable? I have also for as long as I can remember been highly creative… and when I retrace my childhood activities, I was also the kid that would be sat in his room alone with a huge box of random lego bricks for days on end, whereby if you didn’t come up with something cool like a well designed castle or space ship or whatever you would not be having much fun that day… this right here is intensely challenging your creativity and imagination. I have also noticed there has been periods of my life where I definitely felt dumber and less capable than what was possible at other periods of my life…. There has been periods where I would go several months of not really using my mind in a way where it was being all that proactive and challenged… like binging youtube articles, mindlessly scrolling social media etc etc….certain parts of my brain seemed to atrophy and become weaker due to them not being used, the same way in which your leg muscles would shrink if you were wheelchair bound for a long period.
Here’s the list of IQ scores of those in the Nuremberg 21, the highest level officials in the Nazi leadership. For those interested: – Schacht, Hjalmar 143 – Seyss-Inquart, Arthur 141 – Dönitz, Karl 138 – Göring, Hermann 138 – Papen, Franz von 134 – Raeder, Erich 134 – Frank, Hans 130 – Fritzsche, Hans 130 – Schirach, Baldur von 130 – Keitel, Wilhelm 129 – Ribbentrop, Joachim von 129 – Speer, Albert 128 – Jodl, Alfred 127 – Rosenberg, Alfred 127 – Neurath, Konstantin von 125 – Frick, Wilhelm 124 – Funk, Walther 124 – Hess, Rudolf 120 – Sauckel, Fritz 118 – Kaltenbrunner, Ernst 113 – Streicher, Julius 106
Some people are born bigger, stronger, and better looking than other people too. Higher intelligence is just another thing people can be born with that is perceived as being better than lower intelligence. The equality factor is that if you’re uglier, weaker, smaller, or dumber doesn’t mean you don’t have the same constitutional rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as other people
I’m gonna dumb down this clip to Tony Hawk PS1 so every 90’s born person will understand. When you start the game you have to pick which skater you wanna be. Off to the side of the player’s avatar there is a rage of skill sets. Within the skill sets there is a measure from one to six. Some skaters are better at grinding, balance, Ollie, air time, ect. All players relative to one another have some skills they are better at. I think of this measure in the game to day to day human life. It means some people may be born smarter or more athletic or brave or more prone to love or violence but not many are well balanced in all. I know some very smart people that have no ability to hit a golf ball or stand on skates or drive a car. I also know some people who can dunk on a basket ball net like they are MJ but could never cook like Gordon Ramsey. At the end of the day I believe you can learn through your surroundings to increase weak portions of skills in your life, but not to levels others find natural. Ultimately your born with a certain skill set that no matter how hard you try wont match someone who is born with it. I try to sing, but I know I’ll never get paid to do it, no matter how much I practice.
“are there any circumstances under which you would choose to be dumber?” Well that’s kinda the thing. I find it hard to talk about because I don’t want to give the impression that I’m some pretentious fool who thinks he’s brilliant, but most people seem to agree that ignorance is bliss, and I’ve absolutely found myself envious of those who I would say are blatantly ignorant but as a result happen to live these sometimes seemingly overall happier lives. They have concerns and fears and sometimes their fears are completely nonsensical and unfounded, but as a vague example many will have a strong sense of community and camaraderie with each other in their ignorance, and they’re happy there. It may be built because of nonsensical fear but the benefits are real. So there’s that aspect of it and just being someone who is fairly self and and generally aware of personal and external issues, I think it’s fairly safe to say that I’d be less bothered by certain things were I ignorant to them. So the pill question to me, to make it meaningful would be something like “if you take this pill it’ll make you x degree smarter, but you could instead take this pill and live in some degree of blissful ignorance.” The only serious concern there then for me would be what exactly that would entail as far as how much dumber I’d be or in what ways. But if there were ways to quantify it, I bet you there’s a certain ratio or set of attributes of such a hypothetical pill that once set right would be undeniably appealing to me.
Its interesting, the thing about intelligence and the proclivity for being “good” I guess it isn’t always easy to tell but at times when I see people I recon to be pretty stupid on some levels they are people who I find to be less sympathetic, kind, empathetic and or otherwise open to another persons opinions and thoughts. Maybe even without realizing it. And that causes me to see less intelligent people as generally less good. Evil I think is another thing entirely.
What you have not mentioned is the importance of wisdom. If you add another pill to the mix that makes you wiser, which would you choose? It certainly takes intelligence to make a bomb that can kill millions, but it takes wisdom to never use it. The downside to wisdom is misery because a wise person sees the suffering of the world but knows he or she cannot stop it.
There’s intelligence, and then there’s primal instincts. And the latter is what makes us all equal. Also intelligence does not guarantee wisdom, but wisdom requires intelligence (which perhaps explains why some smart people are not honest or play nice—if you’re smart enough, you can justify just doing some random act of kindness to someone who can do nothing for you, which on the surface I’m sure looks similar to a mindlessly nice/friendly person). Funny how that works. As for circumstances where you’d choose to be dumber: I have an experience with that, i recently got into a hyposis sesh to cure my perfectionism/OCD (which was causing me to procrastinate). Under a hypnotic trance I allowed myself to be mindlessly guided to clean the landing in my home. It literally felt like my IQ had been lowered to half & i was grinning from ear-to-ear (which was kind of creepy if I think about it now) but I finally got something that I would overwise overthink done.
I’m a dumb person. I did very poorly in school; barely graduated; never attended university. My parents aren’t that smart either; they’re just ordinary working class people (so there’s no winning genetic lattery of intelligence). To me, personally, a smart person is someone who catches information quickly, is able to understand complex things with little effort, and who can comprehend that information and make sense of it. To be honest, I’m none of those things. And it’s fine. Some people aren’t meant to be smart. If someone is intelligent and uses their knowledge for good, I have respect for those people. They made a difference for all of us. But if someone claims to be smart and yet puts other people down by being arrogant, negative, and toxic, I couldn’t care less about them and their high IQ, intellegence or whatever. At the end of the day, the two things I value most in others are kindness and curiosity. Meaning, you might not be smart enough to dig deep into complex ideas, but at least you have to be interested in learning about the world and humanity. That’s what I’m striving for.
“Are there any circumstances under which you’d choose to be dumber?” This isn’t as obvious a choice as it sounds, and our predisposition is always away from reducing ourselves in any way, so our snap judgement here would always be a no; however, thinking deeply about this, “dumber people” (people with a lower IQ) are almost always happier in life than people with relatively lower IQ scored from comparable socioeconomic backgrounds. So, it depends on what you want from life, and people seem to what to be happy (at least they say they do).
It’s funny how people can accept that someone can run faster or jump higher than them but they want to be the fastest mentally and cannot accept that science has been very accurate in it’s predictions about intelligence. If your measure of “goodness” is intelligence then smart people are better, but I am smart enough to judge people’s goodness based on the morality of their behavior. I am surprised that Lex is not as certain as I am on the matter.
I’ve been labeled as smart all my life and there are genuine reasons why one might want to be dumber. There are some useful illusions that you could partake in. Life might be more enjoyable. Knowing the deep mechanics of life, understanding how we are very much automated piles of goo on a spec of dirt hurling through space can fill you with tremendous emptiness. The ignorant don’t have such concerns, they are content with the way things are everything seems magical and mysterious. As they say ignorance is bliss.
people that are smarter, healthier, helpful and with integrity are worth more than those that dont. If two people are drowning and you can save only one, you save the healthier, smarter, helpful one. Think of it like being on the crashing titanic. We save the children first because they are worth more due to their health (lifespan)
The final question the guest asks, the way he says it gives the impression he thinks there is only one answer and it is obvious. If this is his view, he is very mistaken. Take Forrest Gump for example. Sometimes I think it’d be great to be that level intelligence, so long as it was paired with that level of understanding/acceptance (wisdom?) I think most people are similar to myself, intelligent enough to identify complex problems and the causes but not quite smart enough to come up with workable solutions. I think this is a major factor in why so many people are wilfully ignorant and become apathetic.
To be born intelligent but not the ability to make change is both the curse of the intelligent individual, and the greatest tragedy and failing of humanity as a whole. Could we use to the betterment of mankind every hyper intelligent individual born, without many if not most, being robbed the ability to make positive change, the world and human civilisation could be a wonderful place and thing.
There’s always been something about Lex that I just didn’t like, I used to think it was his cadence, almost monotonic and dull, then I thought, maybe it’s his pretentious “love is all we need” perspective he pours into every single one of his shows, like it’s some kind of secret sauce or something. However perusal this clip it hit me. In addressing the disparity in intelligence between people and how this appears to be genetic such that some people are just smarter and no amount of work or effort will bridge that gap, he then finishes off his question as he looks up at Richard Haier with a half mad half embittered look and says “what do we do with that?”. What do you mean what do you do with that, it just is, why should there be something we must do about that Lex? And if we must do something, what do you propose? Should we start lobotomising smart people so that they are just as stupid as the rest of us? Why is it a problem to you that some people are smarter than others Mr Fridman? Right there I realized that this moron is a hard core leftie at heart, driven by jealousy and a desire to completely level the playing field for everyone. I don’t know what his politics are but temperamentally he is as left leaning as they come. It could be that he is so pretentious and fake that he felt this was the “smart” approach to this issue in order to come off likeable to dumb people but something tells me he actually means it. To your question Mr Fridman, what we do with that is we count our blessings we have super smart people in this world because guess what, we need them, we have always needed them, we have advanced this far because of them and if we have any sense in us we should treat them well and hope they continue to apply themselves to solving the world’s problems be it in science, engineering, medicine, societal etc etc.
Imo being smart has a lot to do with how we handle informations and we are smart if we take things into account nobody else does or did. Beyond that, there are supersmart people that simply have a genetic alteration, like Einstein. Maybe the brain starts to change, permanently also, when we start to use different thinking patterns and if we start to use information in a variety of ways. I definitely know, that we can become smarter by changing our culturally indoctrinated ways of thinking and handling information. If we only can change perspectives for instance, we are already smarter than before. And I feel like there are many of those tools available mentally, that will make us think better, more effective, more complex and faster. Supergeniuses are def born with the right genetics or they themselves figured out until the age of 2 or 3 how to use infos in an unconventional way to get superhuman results. People still can turn into geniuses after that time, by having certain life experiences, by having accidents or by researching the hell out of this universe. Smartness is a complex topic, apparently.
Lex… Some people are smart, some are dumb. Some people are evil, some are Saints. The later two being the hardest to determine. It’s a fine line between genius & insanity. We’re all predisposed to one path or the other by our upbringing, yet some people are thrown “off path” by unforeseen life events. Genetics play a role, albeit small… IMHO.
Theres intelligence (the speed at which your brain makes connections) and then theres education (the amount of information your brain has to make connections with) You’re born with your intelligence and you are then later educated to make that intelligence seem useful. There are notably big differences in IQ scores between racial groups and this unfortunately has not always got to do with their level of education.
Honestly, I think there is an excellent argument to be made when he asked, is there any situation where you would want to be dumber? In truth, people have naturally already accepted that notion, at least the general public. With the decline in public education, people effectively decided to be dumber because, in all honesty, ignorance can be blissful. And for the most part, thier is solid Evidence that suggests humans, in general, have declined in overall intelligence hell; our brain size has decreased; many like to site its because our brains have become more efficient. Or just maybe we are declining as a species. Maybe as a collective, we’ve all decided to be ignorant and dumb but blissful simultaneously. Perhaps constant awareness and thinking of our surroundings and how to solve problems get tiring. Simply existing sounds easier sometimes. So yea, I can argue why someone would willfully want to be dumber. Overall, Idiocracy, the movie isn’t currently far from reality. Instead, we’d be fed a constant stream of entertainment rather than take a minute and analyze our situation life has become a series of distractions without real problems to solve. So not have we only declined from biological disasters like the introduction of Lead into our general population through paint and gasoline we’ve created cognitive decline just through culture. We are indeed on the right path.
I think intelligence is individual and has no bearing on good or evil because that’s free will to choose. I think of it like the bottled water in the grocery store. They come in every size as for capacity. Access to education and opportunity determines which ones and how much they get filled. …..yes, I did want to be dumberer so I could blend in with my socioeconomic peers – so started smoking a lot of weed… “they” always say I think I’m better – well, kinda.
I often wonder to myself what intelligence is. Are there really people more superior in the context of ease of remembrance or aptitude for picking up a new skill? I wonder this sometimes because I feel like I am a little bit slower than the average person. It definitely takes me longer to remember a thing or pick up on a skill but I always compete in the top 1% nonetheless. Does will power level the playing field if mental superiority does exist?
Intelligence is weird one mainly because it depends on how we percieve ourselves and then how we act upon it. Along with the the Kruger effect (not sure that’s what it’s called). From my little knowledge Hitler saw himself as a superior and manipulated the German-working class into similar beliefs. You haft to be pretty intelligent to proceed to do that Alone. Along with committing some horrific events. My point is it’s how you use the intellectual ability you have to either good or bad use. Imagine he used that for good world might be a different place. Same goes with anything🤷🏼♂️
The only problem is that Marx did not understand most of what he thought he understood (which seems to be happening with this guy as well). Honestly, his mistakes were very basic. And they are irreconcilable. The fact that we still discuss him as anything but a bad thinker is not his merit, is our mistake.
If you’re speaking on being smarter in all things then the comparison that we have seen are nowhere close to the smartness that we’ve experienced… meaning it’s smarter to do good by others rather than not.. if you have to hurt people to be considered smart than that would be how is that good? That shows a lack of of intelligence, don’t you think?
Guess some would see this as a controversial/sensitive topic but I don’t see why. There is a genetic component to intelligence, so what? Not everyone has to be a university graduate. Sure job automation is increasing but at least for the foreseeable future there will be work available for people with less of an education. I have a job that doesn’t require an education (janitor in a gym) and I’m as happy as can be. Sure the income for such a job is low but money isn’t the be all end all. As long as you can support yourself you can be happy. Can add that if I had the opportunity to take a high paying desk job I would decline. I would be miserable sitting behind a desk all day. I love being active, working out etc.
You have a picture of Magnus Carlsen, who has probably put in more hours as chess than virtually any human who has ever lived. Also he has a prodigious memory, which aids his ability, and that is obviously not related to IQ. Nobody is born ‘smart’ – otherwise we would be handing out Nobel prizes at birth, but some people definitely have the ability to develop smarts more than others.
I really don’t know how smart I am. I used to think I was very intelligent since I missed 2/3rds of high school and still got As and Bs. But I never had much direction until recently and failed at my pursuits many times and was deep into addiction in my past. I’ve always excelled in any work I do in different fields. More recently I’ve thought I’m not that smart especially when hearing very smart people speak. But then again I talk to some people and instinctively know I am more intelligent then them after they share a few words. I don’t know if it could be considered the dunning Kruger effect since I thought I was smart before and now think I’m not! Lol Can anyone relate?
Some people are magnitudes smarter than others. Thats why if we want to succed we need to make goverments to invest shittons of money in IQ increase drugs (CRISPR and co), aplications, diets and co. If our kids will be smart enaugh they will find solution to any problem. It will not increase inequality, but actually decrease it.
You shouldn’t be surprised intelligence is genetic, in the same way you’re not surprised height or proneness to disease is. Of course, there’s always outliers due to the infinite variety given by sexual reproduction. But two tall Chinese people aren’t going to have small black kids. Similar with intelligence. They’re all traits.
Come on, I want the straight up question: Can People get smarter? And if so, the best why to increase your IQ is through education?. No one asks that when they talk about intelligence with experts and that’s really the most important question about IQ. This massive study says it does (Or at least is one of two interpretations of the data). ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6088505/
Didn’t the Duke brothers in the movie Trading Places use Eddie Murphy to prove that intelligence was not genetic?😂 On a separate note, I love the comments section for this article because people like to talk about themselves and their intellectual prowess which makes me wonder, how smart they really are or a better question, how much common sense do they have. perusal these two obviously intelligent people ramble on and some sort of intellectual word salad that circumvents the simple question of, are people born smart, made me scratch my head and say, what? The article should’ve simply started with that question and the answer could have been divided into four categories – two about intelligence and two “dumb” people. The two groups of smart people are the gifted and developed; the dumb people are divided by genetic disposition i.e. down syndrome etc. and the undeveloped and/or lacking opportunity, which points to environment, i.e. Eddie Murphy. Then, you discuss the categories independently. It really isn’t that complicated and there is ample data to help the discussion …. and, if you are really smart, you focus the conversation on the undeveloped part because that topic would pique the interest of the vast majority of the listeners. Einstein was smart but I’ll bet he couldn’t figure out how to unblock a toilet or change your car tire 😁
Of course genes matter more. It’s like computer hardware. No matter how awesome the software (education/upbringing) is, it will run like trash on crappy hardware. And that hardware, is determined at the manufacturing stage. Unalterable. Your genomic sequence is fixed barring mutations, which by the way are almost always deleterious. There could be so-called epigenetic activations, but that is a speculation that requires further research. Why not just accept measurable, strongly evidential twin concordance studies which show that metrics like IQ very highly correlate with inborn hardware? People should just accept that life is pretty much dogshit and almost 100% luck. But, as TS Eliot said, most people can’t handle reality, I guess.
Understanding the Qur’an gives us a lens of light through which we’ll see the world differently. For me, spiritual intelligence is the highest form of intelligence a person can possess. It makes you gain insight sense things you wouldn’t have even known otherwise… the person has now a powerful intuition ✨️
I believe they are born smart because my kid was counting to 100 when he was one years old. He’s only seven but he’s the smartest kid in his class and they’re giving him math work 2 grades above. He has a ADHD but he is so freaking smart. I don’t know where he got it because it wasn’t for me lol. He has a dream to work with NASA. I just hope he sticks to that dream
What a bunch of stupid mental gymnastics. It’s obvious that when people think or say “better” in that context that they mean more capable and competent at performing cognitive tasks(which is the main thing us urban humans do nowadays). It has nothing to do with morality or subjective value, all of these are just deflections in an attempt to protect fragile egos. Our modern hierarchies are mostly of competence and productivity(of which money is a direct consequence) (Although there seems to be a correlation between IQ and Criminal Behaviour, or at least, Criminal Behaviour that we manage to catch).