Diane Wolk-Rogers, a history teacher at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, shares her thoughts on gun violence and the right to bear arms. She teaches history and has been passionate about supporting young people facing challenges and vulnerabilities. Wolk-Rogers’ TED Talk, “A Parkland Teacher’s Homework for Us All”, discusses the challenges involved in defining and interpreting the Second Amendment and the right to bear arms.
In her TED Talk, Wolk-Rogers proposes three ways to address gun violence in America, inspired by student activists. She invites viewers to contribute their own solutions for a safer future. The talk also touches on the challenges of defining and interpreting the Second Amendment and the right to bear arms.
Wolk-Rogers’ TED Talk has garnered over 67,537 views and 1,418 questions answered. She encourages viewers to contribute their own solutions for a safer future and highlights the importance of educating others about gun laws and the rights of individuals to bear arms.
In conclusion, Diane Wolk-Rogers’ TED Talk is a valuable resource for educators and students alike to learn about gun violence, the Second Amendment, and the right to bear arms. Her work serves as a reminder of the importance of educating and inspiring others to take action against senseless violence.
📹 A Parkland teacher’s homework for us all | Diane Wolk-Rogers
Diane Wolk-Rogers teaches history at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, site of a horrific school …
Can TED Talks be used in the classroom?
TED Talks are widely used by educators to stimulate discussions and complement course materials. They can be streamed from TED. com or the official YouTube channel, as long as they comply with the Creative Commons license terms. Teachers can share TED Talks with students on online forums or class websites. YouTube. com/TEDEducation videos are available under YouTube’s standard policy, not Creative Commons. For licensing TED-Ed videos, please fill out the media licensing request form.
Conference presenters can stream TED Talks from TED. com or the official YouTube channel in a non-commercial, educational context. Commercial entities require a license to show TED Talks at conferences or industry events and should fill out the media licensing request form. The talks must be shown unedited, including TED visuals, partner conference or TEDx event visuals, and TED Talks sponsor’s copyright information. For more information on using TED Talks in a commercial context, contact the company.
What are the 10 most popular TED Talks?
The top 10 best TED Talks of all time cover a wide range of topics, including motivation, entertainment, rich history, mind-blowing facts, and innovative concepts. These talks are diverse and wide-reaching, aiming to educate, inspire, and inform. In less than 18 minutes, speakers from around the world share their take on any subject they like, as long as it embodies the “spirit” of TED. The speeches must be multidisciplinary, focused on the power of ideas to change lives and the world, and should embody the spirit of TED.
Is TED Talk free?
TED’s financial resources are allocated toward the provision of complimentary access to exemplary ideas on a global scale, facilitated through its digital platforms. The TED Fellows program provides assistance to emerging figures in the realms of science, the arts, and social justice, while the TEDx initiative facilitates the organization of independently-run TED-style events in diverse global communities.
Are TED Talks free?
TED is a global platform that curates its speaker lineups and in-person audiences to ensure a diverse group that can support its mission of bringing great ideas to the world for free. The organization actively seeks ideas from all over the world in multiple languages and works to diversify both the lineup and attendee roster. TED also dedicates significant time and budget to bringing TED Talks to people who lack internet access or have other accessibility issues.
The organization is nonpartisan and strives to post talks that contribute to productive conversations. However, some local events have been targeted by speakers who make unsupported claims about science and health. TEDx’s science guidelines state that science and health information shared from the stage must be supported by peer-reviewed research. If you have concerns about a TEDx talk’s content, please contact tedx@ted. com.
What is the number 1 TED talk?
TED is a global platform that offers a platform for sharing ideas, inspiring people, and promoting creativity. The most-watched TED Talk is Sir Ken Robinson’s 2006 talk, “Do Schools Kill Creativity?”, which has nearly 75 million views. The top 8 TED Talks videos collectively have hundreds of millions of views, demonstrating the high demand, popularity, and viewer retention for TED Talks. The best TED Talks are not just eloquent speeches or persuasive power, but powerful calls to action.
These insights equip the audience with the tools to implement the ideas they’ve heard, sparking inspiration and real change. The 20 most popular TED Talks are a sample of this eclectic selection, offering a taste of the diverse and inspiring content available on the platform.
Why are TED Talks only 18 minutes?
TED has identified 18 minutes as the perfect length for a presentation, as it aligns with research on attention spans. All TED Talks are limited to 18 minutes, as it is short enough to hold people’s attention, precise enough to be taken seriously, and long enough to say something that matters. John Medina, a bestselling author, discusses the 10 minute rule in his book, Brain Rules, stating that attention spans drop off after 10 minutes of a presentation.
To re-engage the audience, Medina suggests using Q&A sessions, videos, or hands-on demonstrations as “soft breaks” every 10 minutes. The most memorable acceptance speeches are also the shortest, so reducing the next presentation to below 18 minutes and including an attention break at the 10 minute mark can help keep the audience engaged and remember the content.
What are the top 3 TED Talks?
Sharon Timms discusses various topics, including Elizabeth Gilbert’s “Your Elusive Creative Genius”, Amy Cuddy’s “Body Language”, Tom Thum’s “The Orchestra In My Mouth”, Dan Gilbert’s “The Surprising Science of Happiness”, Brene Brown’s “The Power of Vulnerability”, and Malcolm Gladwell’s “Choice, Happiness and Spaghetti Sauce”. Damon Gameau, the highest-grossing Australian documentarian, discusses the importance of revitalizing Sydney and the impact of place on metropolitan urban development. The TEDxSydney Film Finalists explore the concept of “reality”, focusing on transparency and truthfulness with others and actions following our own beliefs.
What is TED talk assignment?
The objective is to view a TED talk and analyze it using NetRhet Pinterest.
What is the most viewed TED talk about education?
Sir Ken Robinson’s 2006 talk, “Do Schools Kill Creativity?”, has garnered 75 million views, questioning the current education system’s focus on fostering creativity. Amy Cuddy’s 2012 seminar, “Your Body Language May Shape Who You Are”, discusses how power posing can boost confidence, with research on power poses continuing to develop. The next videos focus on leadership roles, with Simon Sinek’s “How Great Leaders Inspire Action” and Julian Treasure’s “How to speak so that people want to listen” both garnering 67 million views.
Additionally, vulnerability researcher Brené Brown’s “The Power of Vulnerability” and activist Sam Berns’ “My Personal Philosophy For a Happy Life” have garnered 46 million views, with Berns sharing his personal philosophy for a happy life, despite being born with a rare genetic rapid-aging disorder called progeria.
Is Ted-Ed a TED talk?
The TED-Ed Clubs program provides students with the tools to develop, evaluate, and present their most significant ideas in a concise and compelling manner, in accordance with the principles of the TED format.
Why TED Talks are so powerful?
The TED stage showcases both prestigious and emerging speakers, valuing their rich content and relatable ideas. Speakers create an authentic connection with their audience by admitting their flaws, fears, hopes, and experiences. The 18-minute TED Talks educate and entertain, with a time limit of 18 minutes or less. Speakers condense their message into key points, ensuring a proper beginning, middle, and end.
The TED approach to public speaking emphasizes the importance of being a relationship with listeners throughout a speech to maximize message potential. The TED stage creates an environment that makes the audience crave knowledge and desire to listen, proving the necessity of being present throughout a speech.
📹 21 Advanced Academic Words Words Ref from “A Parkland teacher’s homework for us all | TED Talk”
PLEASE NOTE This video is a commentary and does not contain any copyrighted material of the reference source. We strongly …
Stop cherry picking facts. Tell the FULL story. Yes, CDC says 96 people a day die by use of a gun, 35k a year (btw, thatt even includes police shooting people that are shooting at them…). The SAME CDC says self defensive uses of guns range from anywhere between 500,000 and 3 million per year. In the same study they found that defensive uses of guns consistently resulted in lower injury rates among victims. So at the low end it’s a 10:1 and a high end of 60:1 in favor of guns being used properly.
In Japan, the have such extremely regulated gunlaws that you can only buy shotguns and/or tazers. It is so difficult to get a gun, legaly, that Japan has not just no schoolshootings. They barely have any gundeaths what so ever. If that doesnt say anything about regulating guns, I dont know what will.
There is clear bias as she only presented facts that might argue for stricter gun control. Her figure that “96 people are killed a day so you might be next” is disingenuous because it includes suicides and murders with illegally obtained guns that gun control laws clearly cannot stop. She completely skipped defensive gun use. “Almost all national survey estimates indicate that defensive gun uses by victims are at least as common as offensive uses by criminals, with estimates of annual uses ranging from about 500,000 to more than 3 million per year (Kleck, 2001a), in the context of about 300,000 violent crimes involving firearms in 2008 (BJS, 2010).” And she completely dismissed the value of the 2nd Amendment. These students might be “armed with incredible communication skills” but they often lacks facts to support their beliefs. So I would suggest your knowledge include facts that the media isn’t telling you, as mentioned in this article: youtube.com/watch?v=p4j7tYihvJM
6:46 “This change over time is striking to me because this reminds us that interpretation of the second amendment and cultural attitudes about guns have changed over time. Which gives me hope that they can change again.” Attitudes about guns may change but the second and amendment still stands regardless of your feelings.
Maybe she should also take a statistics class where the first thing you learn is you can find a statistic to support or contradict any argument. Too bad she didn’t also share that the CDC has also confirmed their data shows that DEFENSIVE gun use happens MORE regularly in the US than gun crimes. My heart goes out to all victims and I also understand they need to be angry and blame someone or something. But it’s a cop out to blame guns, the NRA and the 2nd amendment. There were so many failures that contributed to that young man going into that school that day and shooting his classmates and until people admit that and take a good hard look at them, violence will continue. Next time it might be with a bomb, or poison, or a truck, or small aircraft, or who knows what.
A. Allow teachers willing to arm themselves, to carry in the classroom. B. Provide for school choice, so parents can best decide the school that best fits provides what parents want. C. Reevaluate the drugs we force on our children. D. Hold schools liable if they don’t provide adequate security. E. All of the above.
For doing “research” she sure didn’t read about the writing of the second amendment because you have no idea what Jefferson meant by militia. Every man of fighting age was the militia, and that was extended to woman in the 20’s. Now why can’t the right of the people to keep and bear arms be infringed? First the usual statement, the forfather’s just left a tyrannical government, secondly, every man and woman of fighting age is a lot of people to have to arm, an impossible task for a logistics officer in short notice.
“I knew I needed to start with the Second Amendment and the NRA. In case it’s been a while since you’ve been sitting in a history class, here is what the Second Amendment actually says: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Meaning, the federal government could not infringe on the rights of citizens to participate in well-regulated militias. ” I have to point out that you are very wrong. It clearly means that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, so that they can be part of a well regulated militia. It even says so. You can’t change the language because it doesn’t agree with what you want. The rights of the people should not be adjusted because the government failed to do its job. Failed to help this unstable young man many times prior to this event you so tragically had to witness. Then failed to engage him and stop his senseless taking of 17 lives. “The Second Amendment was ratified 226 years ago. It was written in a time before the federal government’s armed forces were among the most powerful in the world and when state militias were viewed as necessary to protect the states. ” This is why the people should not be forced to give up their only means of defense from a powerful force such as the US military. “Fast-forward 80 years, to 1871. The American Civil War had ended a few years prior, but a couple of Union officers had witnessed some pretty shoddy marksmanship on the battlefield.
“Nearly 1000 people were fatally wounded by on duty police officers” How many lives did the police prevent from being fatally wounded with use of their guns? The CDC states that “roughly 11,000-14,000 lives have been lost through non-suicide deaths involving a firearm each year.” Now look at the numbers of prevention 500,000+ Seems this lady, although well intentioned, didn’t investigate all the facts.
“I’m no gun control expert. I teach the humanities.” Something I’m wondering is how this woman got invited to TED so soon after the event happened; whereas (for example), the mother of one of the Columbine students wan’t invited until years later, and for a much less propagandistic-sounding message than this. It’s almost like an agenda is being pushed.
We needed to hear something from the perspective of teachers. This is hard to hear but it needs to be heard. We’ve come a long way since the Columbine shooting in 1999, as shown by the reaction of the students an public response. Her history of the 2nd Amendment and the NRA shows that both are fluid and can be changed. The current knee jerk response of gun owners regarding the 2nd Amendment is shallow and childishly simplistic. This right, in our era, is an anachronism and a shame. It is time we join the modern world.
I wrote a letter to this for my APUSH class. In the email to all APushers and WHAPsters, she said how the whole community is under pressure, as it’s an extremely difficult course, arguably the hardest one for 10th graders to take, and these kids got shot for doing something they do incredibly well and with extreme passion. Seeing as how I just finished my AP exam today, this is especially upsetting. In the letter, I explained it is rediculous how this happens every year, and no change is really ever made for good. Something has to be done America, we can’t let this go on forever.
4:51 incorrect… the federal government can not infringe on the rights of citizens to keep and bear arms. Militias have nothing to do with that right, other than it is one (of many) reason that such a right exists. And these are rights are self evident. You do not have the right because because the government gives you this right, you have this right because it is evident for the protection of liberties that you have the right to defend yourself, just as you have the right to assemble to ask redress from your government, just as you have the right to speak your mind, as you have the right to not be searched for no reason, just as you have the right not to have to board soldiers for the government, nor must you defend your innocence but that the government must prove your guilt. We hold these truths to be self evident. Not much of a history teacher to get the fundamental basis of our country wrong. And further as you continue, you think the militias are to protect the country… and while somewhat true, they are a counter to the government’s standing army. See just about any dictatorship, the government’s army is used to enforce the rule of the dictator. The militia (you, me, everybody) has the responsibility to stand up to the army should we have a dictatorous government. It is not hard to understand. As for the NRA, you are correct, and that is still the primary mission of the NRA, to educate and train in marksmanship. Just because in 2008 it was finally put in case law, it doesn’t mean that is not what the 2nd ammendment has always said and meant (again see the founders writings).
This is probably an unpopular opinion, but I think everyone who is physically capable should join the military. It imparts respect for others, responsibility in areas such as personal responsibility Gun safety, and what I’m going to call ownership but maybe a better word would be stewardship, because while it belongs to the US Government, you are responsible for the care and handling of it. Barring that, I live in New York State and we have to jump through a crazy number of hoops of filling out paperwork, getting a background check and having to take classes, which are provided by instructors who are certified. i don’t know how other states work, but maybe if it was like that everywhere (difficult, not impossible), that would at least shut the people who are always complaining that it’s too easy to get a firearm, which I disagree with for the 1) before-mentioned reasons, 2) I don’t know how the Black Market works, and others I won’t get into because I’m not trying to start an argument and this is long enough as is.
This is annoying honestly. Why can’t a security guard or something in that manner. Protect students on a day to day basis. School shootings are inevitable and I’m not giving up my God giving right to protect my family from another man who breaks into my home with a gun. I’m honestly sick of people not having common sense on this issue. No they do have common sense. They choose to ignore it . Cause they have an agenda.
I understand some of the argument, like when a person can go from Chicago, Illinois to a gun show in Podunk, Indiana to purchase a gun without any kind of background check that seems to be indicative of a problem. Though that the 3rd leading killer in the U.S.A. is medical malpractice, which claims at least a quarter million lives annually. The majority of which is preventable. Not detracting from the need for tightening up the way some states regulate gun sales.
TED Talks are usually superbly well thought out and presented, however, this one really does miss that mark! Yes, the Supreme Court did rule “Such As In The Home”, however, it did not rule “Only In The Home”! No firearm has ever, in and of itself, fired a single shot. Therefore, one has never injured, maimed, or killed anything. A firearm is an inanimate object, it cannot perform any action, until a human picks it up. As far as interpreting the U.S. Constitution, and it’s Amendments – it was written so as to be understood by common citizens. I read & understood the Constitution & Amendments back in the 8th grade! BTW: Nor did it say “State Regulated Militia”!
This is why the public schools are failing. Doesn’t understand how to read the 2nd amendment. The inability to think critically. Can only argue one side of the debate. Disingenious use of statistics. And the grossest part of all grand standing on those children’s graves. This is a piss poor move Ted and disgusting.
You know for being a history teacher she easily forgot the part in history where the populous was disarmed and the government killed millions of political dissidents. But I’m sure that information isn’t important only what goes on in our utopian society that everyone trusts the government and their good will in us. We don’t need to defend ourselves when we have the almighty government to look after us. Maybe there should be an answer E: Get good and protect yourself. Life isn’t fair and neither are evil people. I have always said that we should hire a few veterans of law enforcement or military to protect the schools. At the very least they would be able to be good role models for the children as well.
My question is: why in these mass school shootings are boys only committing these acts? What is happening to out nations young boys that precipitates these acts? They are committing suicide at a rate higher than girls. When these boys go to the school bent on mass murder they are doing so knowing that they will be dead when it’s over, likely by their own hand. Why has their life lost all value except in the perpetration of such a horrible act? Our nations attitude towards Men in general I think is to blame. Masculinity is seen as having little value and no honor. When a woman can keep having children with as many men as she pleases and the government provides her with all of her needs, why keep a Father around? It takes a man to raise a boy, into a man. And those men who aren’t there for their children are sometimes to blame. Other times it’s the fault of the woman. Why would a good man stay with a bad woman? And why would a good mother keep a bad father around her children? Still, Boys have been increasingly medicated and demonized for just being what they are. Too aggressive, too competitive, too loud, and educated in our schools where very few men are teachers by women who only reward them when they act more like girls. A serious lack of Fathers in the home has a lot to do with it. Most of the boys that committed these mass shootings came from single parent homes, being raised by their mothers. In fact, most of the men in prison for murder and other violent acts were raised by women only.
There is one dangerous thing we have no control over and that is that a 3D printer can make parts for a gun and then people can make those guns more effective by making better parts. These 3D printers can make guns that do not have to be registered and once again with the knowledge that we can create guns in our own homes using 3D printers and those schematics are available on the dark web. I’m sure the schematics to make a 3D gun are available in other places. The question needs to be asked, how do we trace and regulate the anonymous ability to create guns using a 3D printer in the home? We are a country that instead of being proactive is reactive. We wait until something happens and then we aren’t fully prepared to stop the senseless deaths that occur because some people feel they have the right to take another person’s life. Doesn’t it come down to one very important thing? We have to understand that our lives matter and we have to teach children that their life and others lives matter. This cannot just be a catch phrase. We cannot allow our children’s first experience with a gun to be in a classroom where their own life and those of teachers and their classmates lives are in danger. We will soon be in the position that we will not be able to control guns at all. I’m not saying we should make all guns illegal because people use guns to hunt and to supply their families with meat. I do think we have the right to own and bear arms and I believe in the 2nd Amendment. I also think it should not be up to one police officer to take away another person’s right to carry a gun based on the police officer’s opinion.
We need more humans leaning,,, but we need teachers that have humans abilities to teaches humans knowledge that works for humans not for a (persons thinking )that only makes you a part of a corporation in where there is nothing good for humans because you’ll spend your time,effort, and life thinking that is normal being a person in where there is nothing human at all 🤥🧚♀️🤦♂️
because people in about 6-7th grade have the worst morals of any other time. As a result, more bullying and extreme reactions to it. Even the victims have crappy morals so perhaps finding some amazing form of increasing morality via various means like parenting and rewarding would help but damn I got no idea how to parent. Also, the 2nd amendment should not be kept around just because it’s old. It’s exactly because it’s old that it should be replaced. Practicality should take priority over valuing old things
wow. really awesome article, but some of these comments are a little disheartening . There isn’t one solution to this big problem, but the point is we can all play a part in an evolution of some sorts. We can all be a part of change. Every one of us can love each other more, take care of our own mental health, think differently about things. We can play a part in being a more responsible gun owner, and compassionate human being. After everything this smart, sweet woman said it’s sad to read comments focused solely on the interpretation of the second amendment and the manufacture’s responsibility.