In 2021, China had 529,300 educational institutions and a significant increase in per capita expenditure on education. The country has built the largest education system in the world, with 418,000 parent schools nationwide training 69.594 million individuals. In 2022, there were 202,000 compulsory education schools in China, staffed with 10.655 million full-time teachers, an increase of 83,000.
In 2019, China accelerated the modernization of its education system through further reforms aimed at promoting quality education and moving up in the education sector. Over half of pre-primary children in China enrol in private institutions, compared to about a third on average across OECD and G20 countries. Nearly 2 million Chinese children are missing out on school because their parents cannot afford tuition fees.
Net elementary school enrollment reached 98.9%, and the gross enrollment rate in junior high schools was 94.1 percent. As of 2015, the government-funded literacy rate in China was 97.2 percent. In 2021, there were 185,700 non-state schools in China, a decrease of 989 over the previous year and accounting for 35.08 of all students.
In China, 0% of primary school-aged children are not enrolled in school, and many children living in remote areas do not have access to a school or some families cannot afford to finance an education. The Chinese Government has made efforts to improve the education system, but more work is needed to ensure that all children have access to quality education and support their families in achieving their educational goals.
📹 20,000 preschools closed. Shanghai hits the world’s lowest birth rate record
Chinainsights 20000 preschools closed. Shanghai hits the world’s lowest birth rate record. In this video, we explore the growing …
What percentage of Chinese go to university?
The gross enrollment ratio for higher education in China has reached 62%. In 2023, the ratio increased by 0. 6 percentage points from the previous year, according to the Ministry of Education.
How good is education in China?
China’s education system outperforms that of the United States in nearly every academic category, with an especially pronounced gap in math. This is due to a significant difference in the college admissions process, which provides the primary incentive structure for students’ time in high school. Chinese colleges only admit or reject students based on their score on the Chinese gaokao, a nationwide exam given to over 10 million Chinese youth. This grueling 9-hour nationwide exam, covering Chinese, math, English, and humanities or sciences, has far-reaching consequences.
Students are incentivized not to waste their time on extracurriculars and unique interests, as they have no effect on college admissions. Instead, they spend their time cramming for the gaokao and obtaining mastery over school subjects in years prior to the exam. This pressure for Chinese students to do well on the exam is further exacerbated by China’s elitist culture, where alma mater holds more sway over social status and employment prospects.
Do kids in China go to school until 10 PM?
The school year in China typically starts in September and lasts about nine months, with summer vacations in July and August and winter holidays in January or February. School days are usually full-day, with 45-minute classes, with more flexible schedules in rural areas. Primary education in China typically lasts five years, except in major cities like Beijing or Shanghai, where children start school at six. After completing primary education, students take mandatory exams to test their knowledge of Chinese and math.
What country has the highest school dropout rate?
Slovenia has the lowest annual average school dropout rate of 5. 2, while Malta has the highest at 40. 5. The country uses cookies for this site, and by continuing, you agree to their use. Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B. V., its licensors, and contributors. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. Creative Commons licensing terms apply for open access content.
Is there a lack of education in China?
Access to high-quality education is limited for children in rural areas, with inequities based on location, wealth, and migration status. These disparities increase with age and are not accessible in environments free from violence and bullying. China, with over 298 million children, faces challenges in educating the second-largest global population. UNICEF is working with the Chinese government and partners to address inequitable access, quality of early childhood care and education, learning outcomes, and inadequate adolescent skills acquisition.
What is the dropout rate in China?
The study examines student and parental perspectives on dropping out from a rural junior high school in northeast China. Data was collected through observation, focus groups, and interviews with students at high risk of dropping out. The official Chinese dropout rate during nine years of compulsory education is 6. 2, but the cumulative dropout rate was as high as 43. 1. The study also examines the motivations of dropouts and their parents, focusing on the poor education environment, low academic performance, and pressures from private tutoring.
Official discourse in China blames high dropout rates on students’ “study-weariness”, but the study suggests that due to the competitiveness of the country’s education system and the disadvantages of rural residents, dropping out may seem a rational choice for many rural families.
Is education available to everyone in China?
China’s education system is primarily managed by the state-run public education system, under the Ministry of Education. Citizens must attend a minimum of nine years of compulsory education, which includes six years of elementary school, three years of middle school, and three years of high school. In 2020, the Ministry reported an increase in new entrants, with 34. 4 million students entering compulsory education, bringing the total number of students attending to 156 million.
What percent of Chinese students graduate from high school?
The Chinese Education Department reports that 77% of students who start high school graduate from a high school, either academic or vocational, before age 20. However, around 6 students stop studying before the Zhong Kao, and more than 10 who pass the Zhong Kao and attend an academic high school are reported to drop out before the Gao Kao. At least 25 students in a vocational high school never graduate. The dropout rate is higher in rural areas than in urban areas, with the most challenging areas reporting a 30-40 dropout rate even before high school.
The government is concerned about an excess of unemployment among college graduates, which Goldman and Sachs suggested is due to a mismatch between popular college graduate degrees and the fields in demand. Improved vocational exposure and career counseling could solve some of these problems, as well as quality alternatives to academic high schools. Historically, private high schools in China have served as models for change for the rest of the system. However, both private and public academic secondary schools are highly regulated, and there is more room for innovation on the side of private and public vocational high schools.
High-quality small vocationally themed programs within schools can solve some of these drop-out and unemployment problems, but they first require cultivating personal vocational stories at a young age. Many educators in China already see the need for early vocational exposure and application programs, but such programs are still rare.
What is the top 1 educated country?
South Korea is the most educated country globally, with a literacy rate of 97. 9 in 2024. In 2022, 70 percent of the population aged 25-34 completed their college education. The country’s rigorous education system, known as “education fever”, is characterized by intense competition and high expectations from students. This culture of hard work and dedication to academic success is reflected in the exceptional performance of South Korean students in international assessments like the PISA test.
Does every child in China go to school?
The Chinese education system is divided into three categories: basic education, higher education, and adult education. Each child must have nine years of compulsory education from primary school to junior secondary education. Secondary education has two routes: academic secondary education and specialized/vocational/technical secondary education. Academic secondary education consists of junior and senior middle schools.
Graduates of junior middle school take a locally administered entrance exam to continue their education in an academic senior middle school or enter a vocational middle school for two to four years of training. Senior middle school graduates wishing to go to universities must take the National Higher Education Entrance Exam (Gao Kao). In June 2015, 9. 42 million students took the exam.
Is China a well-educated country?
The Chinese education system, the largest state-run system globally, has seen significant improvements in quality over the past few decades due to continuous reforms and large-scale investments. Students from Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu, and Zhejiang have achieved high scores in the 2018 PISA assessment, and more Chinese universities are ranked in global rankings. However, there are still significant disparities between elite urban institutions and average rural schools.
The government has placed great importance on the education system since China’s opening, focusing on educating skilled personnel and creating scientific knowledge for economic development. Public spending on education has increased significantly, reaching the official target of 4% of the GDP in 2012. Per capita expenditure of Chinese households on education has also increased, reflecting the importance parents place on their children’s education.
In mainland China, the Compulsory Education Law mandates nine years of government-funded compulsory school attendance, including six years of primary school and three years of junior high school. Students can choose between senior high school and secondary vocational schooling, and their choice of social science or natural science orientation affects the National Higher Education Entrance Examination, also known as Gaokao.
📹 When China stopped having children
From 2020 to 2100, the Chinese population could plummet to half of what it is today. Using population control (one-child policy …
It may seem like a gradual decline of births in China, but by 2028 when the “Let it Rot” generation’s children would be supposedly at five years old, China will find kindergarten enrollment to be drastically low and the steep decline will be shocking. Their demographic chart will show year after year from 2028 will be falling off the cliff. China’s population numbers of 2050 – 2100 will be coming much sooner than expected. The bad news is, unless China finds a way to motivate their young people to marry and make their economy much better, this drastic drop in population is going to continue one decade after another.
Population needs to be in balance with jobs, resources, nature and the environment. Having a bigger population in any country than the country can support makes no sense. Access to food, water, shelter, energy and jobs should guide population levels. The worlds population is still expected to add another billion people to feed, clothe and produce pollution. Humans are crowding out all other species of plants and animals. Education and birth control are key to reducing poverty and hunger. Having a child that you can not provide for yourself is cruel and irresponsible. We need solutions not just sympathy. Endless population growth is not sustainable on a finite planet. Every country needs to “TRY” to be more self sufficient. When there are not enough resources to sustain a population something has to give. Countries need to focus on quality of life for their citizens and not just quantity of life for cheap labor. Why import fossil fuels when wind and solar energy can be produced locally and solar energy can power electric vehicles. We need solutions not just sympathy.
That woman entrepreneur who kept losing, until she lost 4 businesses in total… It seems an important part of her education was missing: that of finding out how the current market is expected to develop. It’s no secret, that far fewer children were born. It’s no secret, that far fewer marriages are taking place.
0:00 it looks like it was ran sacked, what is going on🙁? 0:09 whoa😬🙁 0:21 it sound like it’s a private school here in the US, but the situation is much different. 1:08 20,400+20,000 schools were closed.. is this part of the first batch going😮?? 2:00 the wave of schools closing is going up to 3yrs😨🤯. 3:03 how much does the school need🤔?? 3:27 one could only imagine what the requirements were like before vs now😬. 4:03 I just thought of something right now in the moment, is this also another backfire made by their head leaders who mishandled Xi’s & the CCP’s C-19 lockdowns🤔😬☹ but.. that’s just my 1 cent opinion🥸🥸 4:22 hey, it’s open for your own interpretation, guys😬😬🤐.. 4:36 ..how thoughtful of them🤔??? 4:40 but, how safe is it for them? & yeah, I’m being serious😕 5:04 it sort of does hit close to home when you think about it😶 5:48 wwhhhhooooa😧🤯 6:40 good point🤔, & 6:47 I’m going w/ not really, no😕. 6:58 what 2 screenings🤔🤨? 6:59 oook 7:19 so, is it somewhat similar to a US’s take on jr college & vocation/ skills center? & I’m willing to be wrong on this, so keep your shirts on, please? 7:57 ok. 8:18 it sounds like China missed the great opportunity & example from George Bush Jr.’s plan on “No Child Left Behind”, & they could’ve used that as way of creating new & more options to better help support the Chinese Ppl & themselves, but that’s another topic & empty opinion of mines🥸🥸 8:49 I’m following along.
What if the majority of the existing people living now in chyna would perish soon from disasters or disease or social conflict? This present worrying means nonsense if then. And it’s highly likely to happen to be wiped out almost all of them in the middle of chaos due to various sources like wars, bomb explosions, starvation, another pandemic created by humanity, earthquakes or tsunami,… etc. Then almost all the previous concerns would lose its ground to worry about. Instead a brand new horrors would come close, threatening people’s lives. Who’s gonna survive in such a chaos? Who knows what the future might be? When all things demolished completely down to hell, who’s the winner laughing last? A vast shifting of human civilization is coming at hand, nobody knows where the tide of history will take us. We are nothing but a small leaves floating on the sea of life destined to drift away or stranded on a shore of palm trees where we can take a short break and then ready to departure to the unknown islands of dream.
I look at married couples and I am very happy that I am Single by Choice. It’s to much work to live with a man, that’s time and energy I need for myself. Men want to live like they are 5 years old and live with tveir mothers. Even when both work fulltime, the vast majority of household work is done by the woman. So the only thing a woman gets from a relationship is more work. That doesn’t Sound good.
There is no shortage of people in the world. The current world population of 7.6 billion is expected to reach 8.6 billion in 2030, 9.8 billion in 2050 and 11.2 billion in 2100. The world is already running low of land, food, water, energy and resources as it is and with climate change, the conditions will only worsen.
There are some studies that strongly suggest China’s actual fertility rate is more like 1.1 or 1.2 and that population decline has already begun. It is quite possible that India is already the most populous nation. This discrepancy, if true, is at least partially due to local municipalities lying about births for funding as well as the national government attempting to cover up the looming crisis. This lower number also makes more logical sense considering how long the one child policy has been in effect (since 1978) and how strictly it was applied.
UPDATE November, 2021 Yi Fuxian of the University of Wisconsin has determined that China’s population is about 1.26 Billiion About 150 million less than China reports. He did this by comparing reported births in some years, to the reported children of corresponding ages 10 or 15 years later. This means that China’s population growth had been overstated, and its recent shrinkage understated.
The 0-15 cohort is less out of balance than those born earlier since the problem ratio was already quite apparent. Instead of 1.2 to 1 it may be as high as 3 to 1 for those of prime childbearing age. That means the generally accepted replacement rate of 2.1 children per woman wouldn’t apply in China since a couple would not only need to replace themselves, but also replace all those males who can’t find wives! But the 3-child policy is too little and too late to undo the social damage.
are you saying china was wrong to curb it’s population growth? After 10 years of famine due to agricultural mismanagement and natural disasters? let’s put it into perspective, if China lost 50% of it’s population in an instant. The Chinese population, in China alone, equals north and South America combined.
Because having a baby is expensive and by the time you are done with education, you are looking at half millions dollars!. Also, women does not want to stuck with baby at home with major problem in her career. Look at Japan, Korea, Germany and France, more and more women are making more money than men. The sacrifice for women is too much.
Mostly, my friends and I don’t want to have children as the future seems too uncertain with bad job prospects, out of reach housing markets and climate change destroying huge parts of every day life. Propaganda won’t change our minds, but ensuring a safe future for any children we do choose to have might be the only thing to make us reconsider. We’ve been told our whole lives that the world is over populated, is it any wonder that we thought it irresponsible to have more kids?
So what happens to the world as we become a basically aged population with no one coming after. consumption will be very different. as will energy and cost of labour. Does the world enter a new dark age but with iphones. or do we find a way out of it. It seems a bit fatalistic. Previously the risk of overpopulation was driven pretty hard. Do we risk underpopulation.
Your articles are amazing, I’m loving the website. I’m Brazilian and maybe the number of views would increase if the article had subtitles in different languages. Before it was possible to contribute with subtitles through the translation community, but now only by sending the subtitles directly to the author of the article to add them. What makes it a little bit more difficult because the annoying part of subtitling articles is the timing, so it would be necessary for the article to already have a subtitle so that it could be extracted with the timing. Keep going! Success for you!
Yeah takes about a hundred years for the population to not look that much different. So not really that big a deal, and not really permanent damage. Also really sucks to be a man in China. Not only do you need to pay insane price for your wife, but you need to support your parents when they get old. I know here in the West we like to think its sexist to think a woman could clean dishes or play a sporting roll, but hey, that’s the easy job, and the man pays for everything.
Ask yourself this question. How many babies are being BORN TODAY and for every each day for every young man and young man woman so that by the time these young man and woman are already old and are going to retire these babies, by that time, will be fully matured and educated and highly skilled so that there will be a sufficient number of young working men and women to replace them and to pay the taxes needed to provide the revenues needed to sustain the social security checks and pension checks and medicare funding-budget and etc?
The upside to this is if we can reduce the labour intensiveness of our economy, it’ll finally make it possible for average Chinese people to achieve a Western standard of living. 800 million people making $45,000 a year is better than 1400 million making $19,000 a year. This might even be the tipping point where it becomes possible to achieve true communism.
Is that a bad thing though? With higher standards of living, better education & infrastructure and longer life spans, having a smaller population would make the sacrifices of the past generations worthwhile in the country’s pursuit for economic success. China is already overpopulated and overpolluted as it is – imagine if it didn’t slow down the population growth somehow and stabilise/control it. 500-600 million for a country the size of China would make it sustainable and cleaner, with a better paid, better fed and healthier population. True, there’d be less people to tax, but with better wages and higher value industries rather than what it has now, that could make up for it.
The BBC recently showed an article where they say China,Japan,Italy to name a few will be at HALF their current population by 2100….i know it seems far but not really…..For people that dont like immigration, well ….Africa will be the main and major source of needed workforce in the plane by 2100…..Our grand sons will live in a planet that we would not recognize today…
If China and india wants to reduce its population by half, that half of its population should be sent to live in countries like Russia, Alaska, Canada, Argentina, saudi arabia, Australia and Brazil, because in those countries its population is very small compared to its vast and immense territory that should be populated and inhabited 100% of the entire country.
The once majestic land of China, with its sweeping natural beauty and beautiful cities replete with the vestiges of thousands of years of cultural greatness, has destroyed itself with over population and the notion of consumerist driven progress. If the nation (with half or more fewer people) survives to see the world in 50 years, I feel China would then recapture what made it special and great.
Yes you must have done a lot of research and man hours to put this together, all the articles you’ve done. Very interesting, it’s like looking into the future Really though any civilized society should not have more than 3 children, I consider it rather disgusting these days. Large families were needed to farm, to support poor households when the was child labour and just reflections of religious anti-progressive society. If populations decline, then we don’t have to worry about food and water shortages.
Sorry but a birth rate in China of 1.5 to 1.6 births per family is obviously inflated and obviously false. As since 1979, the Communist Party imposed a very draconian one child per family policy on the citizens of China which lasted to the end of 2015. Then on top of that, since the one child per family policy was finally scrapped at the end of 2015, the birth rate in China ever since has dropped to just .75 births per family. Meanwhile, the replacement birth rate for any population to replace itself is a sustained 2.1 births per family. However, China’s sustained birth rate for the past 42 years in a row was slightly less than 1 child per family when premature deaths are taken into account. Thus, China’s population will be cut by more than half in the next 20 to 30 years and no country, not even China, can withstand the loss of so much population in so little time and survive. As most demographic analysts are expecting China to crash and burn sometime before 2030. Moreover, most demographic analysts claim that the Communist government’s census numbers for 2010 and 2020 have been intentionally inflated. As many analysts both from within China and outside of China have pointed out numerous discrepancies that prove it. Thus, most demographic analysts fix China’s current population to be around 1.25 billion people today. Indeed, this article is obviously using very bogus data and for that, it gets a down vote from me.