Developing your personality involves understanding yourself and focusing on positive traits that strengthen confidence, openness, perseverance, kindness, and humility. Dr. Ipsa Arora suggests five personality traits to develop for success: efficiency, discipline, interests outside of work, honesty, flexibility, and curiosity. These traits reflect how a person thinks, feels, and behaves.
The Big Five personality traits, known as the acronym OCEAN, are inherited and can be developed through self-development activities. Focusing on a particular trait, developing a specific skill, or reinforcing new habits can help you achieve personal and professional growth.
To be more successful, one should develop confidence, integrity, creativity, team player, resilience, curiosity, willingness to learn, eagerness to follow a role model, optimism and positive attitude, having well-rounded interests, and discipline. The top three character traits for professional growth are capable, confident, and cooperative.
Employees also care about personality traits, including being adventurous, ambitious, and approachable. Being aware of these traits can help you develop key skills for personal and professional growth. By focusing on these traits, you can use them to your advantage in various aspects of life, such as writing resumes, cover letters, and requesting promotions.
In summary, developing your personality is essential for personal and professional success, and understanding these traits can help you develop key skills and behaviors that contribute to your overall success.
📹 Who are you, really? The puzzle of personality | Brian Little | TED
What makes you, you? Psychologists like to talk about our traits, or defined characteristics that make us who we are. But Brian …
What are the 5 positive personality traits?
The five basic dimensions of personality theory, developed in 1949 by D. W. Fiske, consists of five broad personality traits: extraversion, agreeableness, openness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism. This theory has been expanded upon by researchers like Norman, Smith, Goldberg, and McCrae and Costa. Researchers spent years trying to identify character traits for analyzing people’s behavior, eventually reducing the number of traits to 16 after Gordon Allport found over 4000. The theory has been widely accepted in psychology and continues to be studied today.
What would you like to improve about your personality?
To improve your personality, focus on developing your conversation skills, becoming more well-rounded, making a good impression, and setting goals. Your personality is shaped by your individual differences in thoughts, feelings, and behavior. To achieve a warmer personality, make good connections, learn new things, and have fun. Expand your knowledge by reading current news articles or novels, stimulating your mind and providing ideas for discussion.
From these readings, form your own opinions about current events, as others may be debating similar issues. Ensure to articulate your points with grace and logic. Setting goals helps you stay updated on the latest trends and contribute to the ongoing discussions.
What are 4 good personality traits?
A positive character is one that responds with honesty, compassion, courage, and care, which can be developed through hard work and patience. These traits are important in the workplace as they increase the chances of success, growth within a company, and leadership. Dishonesty, deception, unreliability, coldheartedness, and rigidity are difficult to build a career on, as a reputation for being trustworthy and reliable is crucial in the workplace. Therefore, it is essential to develop these positive character traits through hard work and patience.
What skills would you like to develop and why?
The individual expresses a strong commitment to personal development, stating that they aim to enhance their time management, organization, confidence, and public speaking skills to become more productive and efficient in their work. They also express a desire to improve their skills in multiple areas, which can benefit both themselves and their employer. In a marketing role, they aim to enhance their data analytics skills, recognizing the growing importance of data-driven decision-making. They have started an online course on advanced analytics techniques and are keen on applying these insights to optimize marketing strategies.
What are the 5 main personality traits?
Contemporary personality psychologists identify five “Big 5” personality traits: extraversion, agreeableness, openness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism. These traits are characterized by sociability, kindness, creativity, intrigue, thoughtfulness, and emotional instability. Understanding each trait and its significance can provide insight into one’s own personality without a personality traits test, and can also help individuals understand others based on their position on the continuum for each trait.
What are the 7 basic personality traits?
Tellegen and Waller’s seven factor model of personality, developed in 1987, categorizes personality traits into seven broad dimensions: positive emotionality, negative emotionality, dependability, agreeability, conventionality, positive valence, and negative valence. This model was based on a lexical approach and has been extensively studied in various fields, including psychology. The model has been further explored in the American Psychiatric Association’s diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders.
What is the best personality trait to have?
The possession of character traits such as humility, integrity, loyalty, patience, persistence, resilience, discipline, and curiosity is essential for success. Curiosity is an intrinsic motivator that propels individuals to pursue knowledge and acquire new skills autonomously, thereby exemplifying their dedication to self-improvement.
What are good traits to develop?
The Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) in positive character traits and personal skills became effective in the Texas Administrative Code (TAC) on August 1, 2021. These traits include courage, trustworthiness, integrity, respect, responsibility, fairness, caring, good citizenship, school pride, and gratitude. School districts and open-enrollment charter schools are required to provide instruction in the TEKS for positive character traits and personal skills at least once during each of the following grade bands: kindergarten-grade 2, grades 3-5, grades 6-8, and grades 9-12.
Schools may provide the required instruction through a stand-alone course or by integrating the positive character traits standards in the TEKS for one or more courses or subject areas at the appropriate grade levels.
What are the Big 4 personality trait?
The Big Five trait models, which include the Big Three, Big Four, and Big Five, have gained support as a unifying framework for describing personality disorder (PD). However, no measures to date can simultaneously represent each level of the personality hierarchy. To unify these measurement models psychometrically, researchers sought to develop Big Five trait scales within the Schedule for Adaptive and Nonadaptive Personality–2 nd Edition (SNAP-2).
Through structural and content analyses, they examined relations between the SNAP-2, Big Five Inventory (BFI), and NEO-Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) ratings in a large data set (N = 8, 690), including clinical, military, college, and community participants. Results yielded scales consistent with the Big Four model of personality (i. e., Neuroticism, Conscientiousness, Introversion, and Antagonism) and not the Big Five as there were insufficient items related to Openness.
The SNAP-2 Big Four Scales enable researchers and clinicians to assess personality at multiple levels of the trait hierarchy and facilitate comparisons among competing “Big Trait” models. The five broad traits common to the Big Five and Five-Factor models (FFM) 1 have been offered as an organizing framework for PD traits, typically labeled Neuroticism (N)/Negative Emotionality, Extraversion (E)/Positive Emotionality/Surgency, Agreeableness (A), Conscientiousness (C) and Openness/Intellect (O).
Other trait-dimensional approaches, such as the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP/SNAP-2) and the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology—Basic Questionnaire (DAPP-BQ), were developed specifically to assess the maladaptive range of traits underlying PD.
What would you like to change in your personality?
The sample answer suggests that if given the opportunity to change one aspect of their personality, they would prefer to be more patient. This is due to the importance of patience in decision-making and building strong relationships. The interview questions include:
- If asked to complete a task they thought impossible at first, how would you approach it?
- What was the experience of filling in for someone and how did it make you feel?
- What was the experience of missing a deadline and how did it teach you?
- Do you prefer working in a team or on your own?
- If you could change one aspect of your personality at the moment, what would it be and why?
- What was the experience of being dissatisfied with the results of your work and how did you handle it differently?
- What are your passions, hobbies, and how do you handle criticism?
- How do you handle criticism and demonstrate flexibility in your work?
In conclusion, the sample answer suggests that patience is a crucial aspect of a person’s personality, and they would approach tasks with a positive attitude and persistence.
What are 3 positive traits?
Positive character traits are essential for personal growth and impact. Accepting is a key trait, indicating a willingness to accept something or someone. Admiring is a feeling of esteem and admiration for someone or something, demonstrating warmth and approval. Braveness is the ability to face and endure challenges, demonstrating courage. True Mydentity defines 58 positive character traits as core positive traits people generally possess.
Their apparel and products support these traits, helping individuals focus on their strengths and take action for positive impact and growth. To discover your dominant positive traits, complete a free questionnaire and receive a downloadable PDF summary.
📹 The Common Character Trait of Geniuses | James Gleick | Big Think
James Gleick, who wrote a biography of Isaac Newton, describes the reclusive scientist as “antisocial, unpleasant and bitter.
My grandpa grew up very poor in Mexico with very little education. However, when he worked at a mine for some time, some Americans were so impressed by the inventions he made to streamline his work, that they wanted to bring him to the US to have him study engineering and work for them. I feel that he was a genius that didn’t receive the nurturing necessary to bloom properly.
Geniuses don’t want to be alone. They aren’t default introverts. It just happens because nobody really understands them. Imagine you are the only human on earth surrounded by dogs. Dogs make good company but the conversations will be wanting. They aren’t going to understand half the things you do and half the things you say. It’s that kind of loneliness.
I’m surprised to not see curiosity as the main subject here. Aside from being smart, what I’ve observed about these characters is simply a love of learning about a particular subject. Curiosity. It’s what allows you to create that unbroken concentration. If you don’t have it then concentration is a battle you constantly are fatigued by. If you do have it, you are energized by everything you discover about your subject. They follow their bliss as Joseph Campbell would say.
I think this was the simplest and truest commonality between geniuses. That aloneness, I think, is due to the fact that you can’t communicate your abstract thoughts as well you intend to to others, I think that’s what drives geniuses to try and express these abstract thoughts in equations—Einstein; paintings—da Vinci; tunes—Mozart, even words— Shakespeare. They don’t work well with others or go to others with their thoughts because they won’t understand, their expressions convey their abstract thoughts and can lead them into better understanding of those thoughts in a way no other person could, not even a fellow genius (subject to his own abstract thoughts and biases)
my advice would be to stay away from popular culture. Follow your own likes and in there you will find your greatest intelligence! Henry David Thoreau said it best, “if a man does not keep pace with his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. let him step to the music that he hears however measured or far away.”
A father of a friend of mine was an astrophysicist. I saw him standing in front of his house one day staring at the ground. As I approached I noticed he was observing the wind going across a large mud puddle. He seemed embarrassed when I greeted him, because he jolted out of a trance like state and fumbled for words. I asked him what he was doing and he just laughed it off and said “Thinking…just thinking.” I wish my teenage self would have gotten to know him better. He was a man of few words though.
yes, from my life experience I would agree with that. I think curiosity is the driving force for many geniuses. They become obsessed with understanding something completely and put all of their energy into it. Also, I think they are gifted with intelligence that only a small percentage of people possess. It’s those two things working in tandem that allow them to make important discoveries.
Complete focus on the task at hand, figuring out the issues and developing the strategy be it science based or design based is the key. Great things do not come from people who talk a lot. They come from people who think a lot, which means isolating yourself from distractions. Patience is another factor plus stamina to see it through.
I always remember that “Malcom in the Middle” episode where he had a genius friend who was slightly younger. Malcom asked his genius friend what it was like to be a genius. He said it was like the mind was a buzzing bee, humming with life and activity. And that his mind was like thousands of these bees working in unison, while Malcom’s mind was like one of those bees. lol
I am a close observer of people from all walks of life and their behaviour. It also helps that I am a doctor. I’ve found that the most common trait of those we would label “geniuses” is imagination. You certainly don’t have to be book smart. The smartest man I ever met in over 50 years was my cousin-in-law who could take apart and rebuild all kinds of engines, owned a phenomenally successful tool and die shop manufacturing all sorts of items on a mass basis for many large companies whose names everyone would instantly recognize. As we were very close with a mutual respect for what the other could do, while I knew that he dropped out of high school to start a family (being in midwest farmland) I was shocked when as he was dying from cancer he told me, rather ashamed, that he never learned to read. And I had always marveled at how he could construct complex iron exterior railings for steps leading up to a house, with complex changes in height and curvature. To this day I don’t know how he could do such work. Imagination and being able to visual a complex construction through the minds eye in the empty space you look out into in front of you are the greatest gifts. Me? I just learned from texts and trial and error. I believe imagination to be the foremost and valuable trait to have.
The point of this article was to show that no one thing consistently distinguishes a geniuses from most people, other than the habit of solitude, and an intense work ethic, if you look at any individual one would call a genius whether of dance, music, science, or math they spent a considerable amount of time alone practicing and working with whatever there craft was: their medium for expressing their genius. It is not argued that these aren’t intelligent people; however, is the valid explanation of their command of their domain in their intelligence, or in the fact that they could concentrate and spend hours on things that most individuals wouldn’t care to spend any time focusing on, and not in some superficial and mindless way, but in a pain staking grueling manner, at times, day in and day out. Hence, “a Passion for the Abstract.”
Apparently the term “genius” in high school is defined as a Straight A student… There’s a mere difference between “someone who’s really proficient at math”, “someone who works really hard to be proficient in Math”, and “someone who works hard to be good in Math and forget the lessons after grades have been given”.
A lot of people believe what make people smart is someones GPA level or how well they did on a test. The fact that they’re a mathematician or not. Or how well a person did in college. Not to say you’re not smart, but honestly you could drop out of college and still be more comparable to Einstein than someone who’s the top of the class. Why? Because of a persons perception and experiences. People take information in differently. Process it differently. Not everyone has the same type of brain. Some brains are a little more complex, and some people just don’t have the motivation to learn. They don’t see the point. When I was in high school I passed by having a 1.7 GPA. Low as fuck compared to most, but this is because I didn’t care. Yet in college I passed with a 3.16. I cared to learn a little more. I started to process things differently as I grew older. I like how he talks about abstract thinking. A lot of this is true for geniuses. Tesla was known partially as a mad scientist and yet by todays standards we know he was well beyond his time. You think that a thousand years ago the idea of flight was even conceivable? Fuck no. Yet today its as common as walking your dog. We look at people and we see their faults. Oh he/she’s a bad speller so he/she can’t be smart. Or he/she doesn’t understand the ideas as well as the other kids in the class so he/she must be slow. This isn’t always the case. Talking about Einstein. The man believe it or not wasn’t always the best in math when was younger, but this is because his brain was telling him other ways of solving a problem that the teachers just could not understand.
Geniuses all have one thing in common. That is the ability to ask themselves questions regarding the unknown. Once the question is served up to their minds, a process then begins to seek answers. It is like planting a seed, then allowing it to take hold. And, finally producing a result. When is the last time you asked yourself a question about an unknown?
I have read both these biographies and found them very interesting studies of the connection between personal trauma/angst and genius. I felt bad for Newton…rejected by his mother and not exactly embraced by schoolmates…isolated for sure, but drove him to fill his life with experimentation in many directions. I wonder if Leonardo DaVinci had personal angst going on as well…thank you for these great reads and others!
Genius as a special category aside, growing up exceptionally bright and creative (unless you grow up in an environment full of equally bright, supportive and emotionally available loved ones) is an isolating experience– I suspect more so before the internet. Even a modestly gifted person, with, say, an 20 IQ points above average, has probably grown up surrounded by people whom they eventually found were noticeably less intelligent. They may have interests and passions that arent widely shared by those around them. They might be ridiculed for their differences, depending on their social skills and environment. But even if they arent, it can be a lonely way to grow up. The greater the gap, the more powerful the potential effect. Growing up like that can have a damaging, isolating effect. It can make you arrogant, or misanthropic, or emotionally withdrawn or hesitant, or it can make you the kind of person who presents a dumbed down persona to the world to avoid hurting others or being rejected. The internet has made things different, you can now find peers and people who share your interests more easily, no matter who you are. Though, it can also mean a broader, more anonymous audience to reject outliers for being nerds, and a broader and apparently dumber hoi polloi to help foster arrogance and misanthropy 😞 I guess it would take a series of studies to find out whether highly creative and intelligent people who were born after, say, 1990 Feel less alone than those born before?
Genius are often morally complex. Because of their capacity to concentrate and their realization of that, they often sees a things from different perspectives before conclusion. It’s like disagreeing with yourself over and over, filling the slots that should and usually be filled be people (aka discussion) before finding a one concrete and well thought finish. Sure it’s great for the abstract and logic, where there is only a straight forward answer. But for morals and ethics, especially if s/he is young, s/he will often answer from a logical perspective or play ignorant all together. Because of these things, I say. even as high as geniuses can go, they are indeed human, who cannot play God from beginning till the end of their chapters.
That extreme concentration he is talking about is basically “the zone” like how really good sports players get into a zone of concentration. It is almost like exercise, the more you work on it, the more it happens and as a result, it is easier to achieve. When I was younger and furiously teaching myself to program I could get so deep in the zone I would just pound out tons and tons of code, sleep a few hours, and then wake up and code more. The more immersed in it I was, the easier I slipped into it. Now its hard to get there because I have so many distractions. Adderall or similar is a good shortcut but it only gets you halfway there and no matter how much you immerse, you can never get fully into the zone with drugs.
Thought my way out of OCD one morning while sitting in a chair after I had struggled with it for 2 years. I have never applied that much concentration since then. Quite frankly that whole mental illness made me apathetic towards many things. If I could find the motivation and the will to really dig deep without preconceived notions filling my head, I am certain I could create great things. Maybe it is pure arrogance but I know the potential lies somewhere within. I think all of us have amazing potential to do extraordinary things but usually are content with the ordinary.
I always say that the real sign of a genius are those that can remain focused on a single “thing” for prolonged periods of time. Viewing it from varying perspectives, repetitively over time, remaining focused on finding a _________. Now, whether or not they are using this focus for good or bad is another arguement entirely. Non the less, if you have an interest or apptitude for some”thing”, and can go to places and levels others can not fathum on thier own, you have potential beyond your peer humans. And yes, this includes all types. (all ‘smart’ folks who may attack grammar or spelling, Pshhh)
Feynman being social but working better alone doesn’t surprise me. Two of the greatest and most creative writers of the 20th century, James Joyce and Marcel Proust, met once in 1922. They barely spoke and when they did it was about trivial uninteresting things. Proust later wrote: “I do my intellectual work within myself, and once with other people, it’s more or less irrelevant to me that they’re intelligent, as long as they are kind, sincere, etc.”
Isn’t this the character trait of anyone who thought school was easy? Because that’s many people. In my opinion (I’m just guessing as a layman with extremely limited knowledge of science, but the guess comes from trying to understand four space dimensions and failing to do so) is that, that trait is the baseline among scientists. (Refresh page to see the “Read More”-button if you can’t see it here) Geniuses seem to not only have a crazy ability to understand abstract ideas and math, but also the ability to understand the consequences that the math and those abstract ideas have for how reality really looks at a grander scale than what is currently known amongst the smartest humans. They’re able to visualize that abstract reality (which really is the real reality) and then make formulas based on it. Please correct me where I’m wrong. I even had a hard time trying to write down my understanding of their understanding because I lack so much of it.
The coolest aspect of this article is, he gives two examples of “Geniuses” for us to examine and find guidance. No one likes complete isolation. Our brains are not broken. Our motivation can decrease depending on warmth. We are humans. So it’s important for socially ” struggling” ones, to examine the socially successful ones. Study them. Find the tangents they got to comedians or presidents. look what we are missing. Everything is a recipe. A key with little to zero directions can unlock any lock. If it can adapt to the wished task. That’s why these articles are great. Since it was fun to read through the debates I’d like to share my take: Judging openly is crossing borders. A form of abuse. It is to be questioned why people feel like “roasting” each other in platforms like these. Highly likely, that one who does so, doesn’t truly stand in awareness of why one is here. The lack of self awareness and self realization will probably lead to a toxic mixture that wants to over cross its own vessel. It’s 1930 central Europa mentality. Not aware of my full strengths. Knowing others got talent or even more talent. Let’s envade others. It happens for people who victimize others that they had been victims in similar ways. For that case I hope to raise awareness that the moment one leans over your boarders they are in unbalanced state and their opinion is to be seen like this. A demonstration of physical laws and a clear indicator that all humans create one big spectrum. Without the individuals who act this way maybe we would act more often this way.
Everything said and done about the genius people about their exceptional ability, it also requires one more ingredient to be added, that is the understanding ability of the “social environment”, because that also plays a vital role in this aspect. Since, by default the geniuses are prone to be very peculiar and delicate to be handled by others ( human society ). For an example, an egg has to be handled carefully. If pressed hard in the hand it will break, on the otherhand if it is kept loosely it will fall down. Hence, any society that understands this nature will only have with them more and more geniuses among them. Not otherwise. Obviously, it requires a lot of tolerance in the society if they want a genius person to live with them.
The other major difference between Newton and Feynman was about 70 IQ points. Newton had an IQ score of approximately 200 whereas Feynman’s was about 130. This would explain the differences in their personalities as Feynman would find socializing with “common folk” much easier than Newton since he was much closer to them intellectually.
Very good. Yes, I fully agree about the aloneness of thought – the independence from the status quo that pervades and saturates other people and the world. And also the quiet stillness, the absence of distractions. That’s when the mind becomes freed, excited, open to the new, without any restraint except its own energy supply. Bruce (Tomo) Thomson NZCE Telecom Online writer, presenter. New Zealand
Usually when it’s bed time for average people, it’s the time i look forward to the most, i can go for a walk, or conduct what ever i need to do in peace and calm without people disturbing me, i go to bed when people usually get up in the morning, people that know me have a hard time understanding how i manage to function, it’s simple really.
Geniuses are not introverts, they often consider if the listener would actually understand their thoughts! or have the complete grasp. Humans hate things they can’t understand cuz it challenges their prime difference between other species. Geniuses always re-consider to talk or explain about certain aspects untill they find the suitable person.
One characteristic of geniuses, I think, is a feeling of isolation–a feeling that when they’re communicating with others, they are imposters, dumbing down their thoughts so that the rest of us can understand. Thus, they have a lot of trouble communicating freely and openly. And, free open communication are fundamental to almost all human relations. This feeling of isolation no doubt leads to other character quirks. They may include introversion or they may manifest as a pretense of extroversion. Not that I would know…
Being a genius means you’re fundamentally different than your peers. Finding a mate is difficult. I took the WISC-IV in the 3rd grade and was treated much differently after having obliterated the IQ test. It doesn’t make me better than other people. I just feel different. I may look a certain way but the way I go about life is different. I’m a pretty shy person.
You can’t pin-point a set of natural mental qualities/capabilities responsible for their success. It’s all about right combination of all those necessary traits to be an efficient recipe of a person with being at right place & right time by putting enough efforts towards one field problem at at time.
I don’t in any way consider myself a genius, but when I’m composing music, I feel most in my element when I’m alone. I become a bit of a perfectionist and overly critical, and it’s extremely easy for me to critique every tone, instrument, etc until it’s as close to right as possible. However, I love to teach, yet find myself unable to fully concentrate or “go there” in the presence of others unless I’m collaborating. And this is different still than the feeling when performing. I feel I do best when I get lost in the music and the metacognition kicks in.
I am more like Newton.. so antisocial and misanthropic. And will never have sex)) lol More important, I agree that for many people it is hard to understand how to see interest in abstract things, or how to concentrate on thinking constantly… I dont see anything interesting in simple human life, but I see much interest in understanding how this world works. And I am always thinking… it is much more productive than talking with someone… when I try to explain my views to others, they dont understand… as much as I dont understand life and views of other people.
What I think is strange, is that no one in any of the comments below mentioned concentration. A few people quibbled about abstraction, a few made jokes, and others regaled in the stupidity of those comedians. It is doubtful that the entirety of what was said could be grasped, if they failed to note this pivotal characteristic. It was this ability to concentrate with intensity that forced them to be so alone. 66,448 people have seen the article at the time I am writing this message. The article was only 2:36 long. It fascinates me to see how many people are interested in this type of educational entertainment. Truthfully, I was also fascinated to see the variety of response from people that had taken the extra time and effort to produce some relic of what they had seen. Though, as I said, some were less than amusing.
Why surrender when you know your right about something. Far be it for others to break from the herd mentality. Who would the Geniuses be to lead them, in their right mind, if they felt that their intelligence wasn’t even their true selves. They would rather be off living a life like the rest of the herd.