The study by Ashwini Deshpande and Thomas E. Weisskopf aims to examine the impact of affirmative action policies on productivity in the Indian Railways, the world’s largest employer subject to affirmative action. The researchers conducted a systematic empirical analysis of productivity in the railway labor force, examining whether increasing proportions of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in employment reduce efficiency in the railway system.
The results showed no evidence that higher percentages of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the railway labor force have reduced productivity. In fact, some of the results suggest that the opposite is true, providing tentative support for the claim that greater labour force diversity boosts productivity.
The study also examined whether affirmative action beneficiaries in employment reduced efficiency in the railway system. The results showed that affirmative action has not significantly improved productivity in the Indian Railways. Critics of affirmative action policies often claim that increasing the percentage of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the railway labor force has reduced productivity. However, the study found no evidence for such an effect, and some of the results suggested that the opposite is true.
In conclusion, the study provides a comprehensive analysis of the impact of affirmative action policies on productivity in the Indian Railways, highlighting the need for further research and policy changes to ensure that these policies do not negatively impact work efficiency and productivity.
📹 Supreme Court Ruling on Affirmative Action: 4 Changes For Students
No more affirmative action? The Supreme Court ruling that occurred on June 29, 2023, marks a major change to the admissions …
What are the three types of affirmative action?
Affirmative action, a public policy in the United States, is implemented by private and public sector managers through three principal methods: voluntary, court-ordered, and executive-ordered.
What are the negative effects of affirmative action in the workforce?
Those with opposing views contend that affirmative action benefits the very individuals it is designed to assist. However, they argue that it can also result in the formation of negative stigmas and stereotypes about the capabilities of minority groups, ultimately leading to their failure in positions of authority.
How does affirmative action affect the economy?
Affirmative action is a US policy that aims to improve the labor market status of minorities and women by distributing jobs and student slots. However, the effects of affirmative action are not significant. Minorities who benefit from affirmative action often have weaker credentials, but there is little solid evidence that their labor market performance is weaker. Minority students admitted to universities under affirmative action have weaker grades and higher dropout rates than their white counterparts, but their graduation rates and later salaries seem to rise.
Affirmative action generates positive externalities for minority and low-income communities, such as better medical services and labor market contacts, and may benefit employers and universities as well. The future of affirmative action in the US will largely depend on political and legal factors that are hard to predict. Leaning towards equity through interventions in later stages, like hiring subsidies, might not necessarily sacrifice efficiency, as disadvantaged groups are likely to benefit the most from selective education or job opportunities. Similar legal arguments have been made in favor of redistributive policies in later stages, especially in college admissions.
What are the effects of affirmative action in India?
Affirmative action is a set of policies implemented by governments to support disadvantaged groups who have historically faced discrimination in areas such as education, employment, housing, and society. The main goals of affirmative action are to bridge inequalities in access to education, employment, equal pay, and better living standards. An example of affirmative action is the reservation of SC, ST, and OBC students in government-run education institutions and political representation in public sector undertakings, civil services, and statutory bodies. However, implementation issues include lower participation in legislative proceedings, discrimination in justice-related matters, and no time limit on reservation policies.
How does affirmative action improve productivity?
Affirmative action programs aim to remove discrimination barriers and increase opportunities for underrepresented entrepreneurs. They include training programs, outreach efforts, and equal pay provisions. Organizations and institutions are held accountable for creating equity, such as federal contractors and subcontractors collecting data to prove fair hiring and recruiting programs. This leads to greater workplace diversity, a business advantage that boosts profitability, productivity, and innovation.
Companies with more culturally and ethnically diverse executive teams are more likely to see better-than-average profits. Even in businesses not bound by governmental regulations, affirmative action sets a standard of behavior, and companies can use government affirmative action policies to build their own diversity, equity, and inclusion programs.
What are the disadvantages of affirmative action in India?
Affirmative action is a controversial topic in the United States, with supporters arguing that it promotes equality for socio-economically disadvantaged groups and representation for those who have faced historical discrimination or oppression. Opponents argue that it is a form of reverse discrimination, favoring the most privileged within minority groups at the expense of the least fortunate within majority groups, and hindering minority students when applied to universities.
The term “affirmative action” was first used in 1961 by President John F. Kennedy in Executive Order No. 10925, which required government contractors to ensure fair employment and treatment without regard to race, creed, color, or national origin. In 1965, President Lyndon B. Johnson issued Executive Order 11246, which required government employers to hire without regard to race, religion, and national origin. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibited discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
Affirmative action has become synonymous with preferences, goals, and quotas as upheld or struck down by Supreme Court decisions, even though no law had been passed explicitly permitting discrimination in favor of disadvantaged groups. Some state laws explicitly banned racial preferences, and some laws have failed to explicitly legalize race preferences.
Affirmative action is intended to alleviate under-representation and promote the opportunities of defined minority groups within a society to give them equal access to that of the majority population. The philosophical basis of the policy has various rationales, including compensation for past discrimination, correction of current discrimination, and diversification of society. It is often implemented in governmental and educational settings to ensure designated groups can participate in all promotional, educational, and training opportunities.
What is one argument in favor of affirmative action?
Affirmative Action aims to end discrimination based on race and nationality, providing non-whites with decent jobs and enhancing diversity in higher education. It encourages interaction with people from different backgrounds, promoting growth and eliminating stereotypes. Affirmative action also provides educational opportunities for those who have faced challenges, such as economic hardship or limited resources.
However, some argue that affirmative action does the opposite, as it unfairly considers race in admissions to colleges and universities. Some argue that these students are not equipped to perform in high-performing institutions, and that affirmative action discourages them from achieving their best. They also argue that giving minorities “special treatment” is a way to demean them and perpetuate a lack of incentive for them to achieve success independently.
Connecticut College supports affirmative action, arguing that it influences hiring practices but not admission procedures. The college supports affirmative action as a tool for achieving diverse workplaces, although not all members of the community support its use. This topic has become a topic of debate on campus, as it is often the focus of debate on campus.
In conclusion, affirmative action is a valuable tool for promoting diversity in higher education, but it is not without its criticisms. It is essential for institutions to recognize and address the needs of diverse students and faculty to create a more inclusive and inclusive environment.
What are the benefits of affirmative action in the workforce?
The affirmative action obligations of OFCCP are not similar to those taken by some educational institutions to increase racial diversity. OFCCP enforces nondiscrimination and affirmative action obligations to ensure equal opportunity in the federal contractor workforce. However, some post-secondary educational institutions have implemented a distinct concept of affirmative action that allows race to be weighed as one factor in admissions processes.
The Supreme Court’s decision in Students for Fair Admissions applies only to higher education admissions programs and does not address the employment context. There are lawful ways to foster equitable and inclusive work environments and recruit qualified workers of all backgrounds. OFCCP’s affirmative action requirements enable employers to reduce the risk of discrimination and recruit and retain diverse talent.
What are the disadvantages of reservation system in India?
The Indian reservation system, rooted in the country’s caste system, aims to provide equitable access to government jobs, educational institutions, and legislatures for historically disadvantaged sections of the population. Originating as a means of addressing historical injustices based on caste identity, the reservation system operates as a quota-based affirmative action, often referred to as positive discrimination.
The idea of caste-based reservations was conceived by William Hunter and Jyotirao Phule in 1882, formalized in 1933 with the introduction of the “Communal Award” by British Prime Minister Ramsay Macdonald.
Post-independence, the reservation system initially focused on Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) but expanded to include Other Backward Classes (OBCs) in 1991 based on the recommendations of the Mandal Commission. The system has undergone significant evolution over the years, with the Mandal Commission’s recommendations expanding the system to include Other Backward Classes (OBCs).
What is the difference between affirmative action in the US and India?
Both the United States and India have enacted affirmative action legislation with the objective of combating discrimination against minority groups and women. Additionally, these countries have implemented such measures to address the historical discrimination faced by the “untouchables” in the Hindu caste system.
What is the difference between affirmative action of USA and India?
India’s affirmative action policy includes reservations in higher education, government positions, and legislature representation, while in the United States, race-conscious admissions processes are common. Both countries have their own affirmative action policies, with India focusing on reservations in higher education and the United States focusing on race-conscious admissions processes. Both countries’ policies aim to ensure equal opportunities for all.
📹 Affirmative Action Debate: Tim Wise3/14- Intelligence Squared U.S.
The motion: “It’s time to end affirmative action” Moderator: Robert Siegel Speaking for the motion: John H. McWhorter, Terence J.
Slight correction: in 0:33 you claim that direct affirmative action policies used a quota based system where a certain number of seats are reserved for applicants of a certain race. Even before the recent Supreme Court ruling that would have been illegal. In Regents of the University of California vs Bakke the Supreme Court ruled that the university could not use a strict quota based system to reserve a certain amount of seats for applicants, it could use race as a factor but it could not reserve seats for applicants of certain races, and therefore no one could be rejected or accepted based on their race alone. Other than that slight inaccuracy, great article.
I can totally relate. Still remember when I applied to medical school in 2019, to a Federal University in my own state! Alot of persons from my state were denied admission, who scored higher than a few other candidates from a particular region of the country (the North) who got in. Did I feel terrible, of course! But this had to be done in order to maintain the ‘balance’ in admissions every year. If they were to admit solely on merit (grades and achievement), you’d have a far less amount of Northerners in school (not trying to say they’re inferior or less smart, but then, the level of education available in that region can’t be compared to what’s available in the South). Was I pained, yes, but then I was considerate and knew the playing field wasn’t the same for us all, and this was the school’s system trying to make things a bit more ‘neutral’. Mind you this slot was only a fraction of the total number that was to be admitted, say 15-20%, so the rest of us had the greater slot to battle for. That seemed fair. Finally, the fact that someone scored higher doesn’t necessarily mean they’d become a better doctor, nor does someone scoring less than others mean they’d make less qualified or knowledgeable doctors. PS: For context, I’m a Nigerian and this happened in my country.
statitics dont apply to individuals, but populaitons. You can question the background of all your doctors, though I doubt people give equal questioning across different races. Unless of course there is some underlying prejudice and it was never really about the merit of the doctor/student, which is often the case when it comes to questioning minority students in my life. From my experience no one has ever questioned the white legacy or athlete on their merits before questioning the minority students.
Thanks @Med School Insiders for posting this article about affirmative action / supreme court. Here are the viewpoints expressed by Supreme Court justices regarding affirmative action. 1) This case is about a group called Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) who sued Harvard College and the University of North Carolina (UNC). They said that these schools were not fair in their admissions process because they were using race as a factor, which they believed was against the law. The law they referred to is the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment*. 2) The Equal Protection Clause is a part of the Fourteenth Amendment that says that every person should be treated equally by the law, no matter their race, color, or nationality. The SFFA believed that by considering race in admissions, Harvard and UNC were not treating all applicants equally. 3) The Court looked at the history of the Fourteenth Amendment and how it has been used in the past. They also looked at how other cases involving race and college admissions were handled. They found that while diversity in a student body can be a good thing, it must be handled in a way that treats all applicants fairly and equally. 4) The Court also looked at the idea of “strict scrutiny*”. This is a way for the courts to look at laws to see if they are fair and necessary. If a law or policy is found to be unfair or unnecessary, it may not pass strict scrutiny and could be considered unconstitutional.
so affirmative action doesn’t mean students that aren’t qualified will get the seat over qualified student that is a misconception!!! Students that are qualified ie able to do graduate in their school are given consideration that fill in the gap of why certain metric was not achieved. In every higher Educational school blacks and Hispanics make up no more than 5% of each graduating class and that’s with affirmative action . While white and Asian students make up close to 95% of each graduating class of every higher education in America, with the exception of the HBCUs . There tells us racism is still big issue on America. In this case systemic and institutional racism . Also legacy students make up 75% of the graduating class at Harvard I wonder why conservative groups are not addressing that with the supreme court.
This is devastating for healthcare as cultural competence is becoming increasingly important as well as having doctors that reflect the diversity of this country. Being a good physician is so much more than test scores and GPA. Interpersonal skills and empathy are not assessed in either yet are essential in medicine.
“Underrepresented students” what does that mean? For what reason should any group be represented by race? And by what metric is representation measured? Is it proportional to the racial demographics of the country? How about we just admit the best applicants because they’re the best; regardless of race? The notion that one race is underrepresented implies that there are too much of another. That’s the only logical inference. So the question is, what do you mean, “too much”? Isn’t that inherently racist?
I was raised in a black working class family with a single mother. But just looking back at the generations before us, by law, your family would have been given access to a “headstart” at the american dream. This is a 200 year headstart that yes applies to virtually ALL whites who lived in America during that time span and that their children and grandchildren would naturally reap SOME benefit of this headstart is not all that hard to understand. Denial is dangerous.
I was always told that affirmitve action was to give women opportunities in the work place. I was also told that during the 1st-2nd world wars jobs in black communitites were plentyful. When the war was over oppression started all over again. There were no black panthers or Klan rallys only Americans and unity. When the millions of whites who served came back all hell broke loose and congress, state officials no one came to our aid. We are still asking for help not hand outs.
On the inheritance issue, I think that only applies to very wealthy whites and it doesn’t explain why Asians that have come over recently with no money have surpassed whites overall. And not following affirmative action rules is not “discrimination”. It’s just failing to discriminate with affirmative action. With inheritance, the only way to know is too look at numbers and see. It’s not something anyone could argue without a ton of information.
damn! He completely changed my mind on the issue. but if we confine this argument to just the issue of higher-education, why not just have applications numbered (eliminating preference for white-sounding names) and then apply ‘affirmative action’ to those from low income areas instead of based on race. my reasoning being that surely there are at least a few disadvantaged whites not benefiting from these programs and a few minorities with an unfair advantage. those numbers might not be significant now but they will be once inherent racial disadvantages are eliminated.
@coolbreezed I’ve made no sweeping allegations in anyway. If you cant understand the the facts on pay difference by ethnicity, crime stats vs prison stats, or the motivation to keep looking to the poor areas for the people to generate income by serving time, I dont know what else to say. If its any consolation, I never used any of Wise’s points to bolster a hatred of whites. Individuals can be a letdown, but should not be used to judge a people as a whole.
@coolbreezed The problem with your whole theory is it completely ignores history, power, cruelty, and greed. You have this desire to dress up facts and common sense as wild conspiracies, but why? Private PRISONS, taking TAX money to lock up the POOR? who fresh out of slavery and still getting beat by police happen to be BLACK? lol.. Can you say “conflict of interest”? When rich ppl make billions by targeting poor areas, that doesnt strike you as a bit shady?
@coolbreezed Or one could argue that the concentrated focus of law enforcement on the black community, resulting in the highly disproportionate number of black men in jail. when coupled with not only the stereotypical notions of blacks not being qualified for any job a white man applies for first, but also having to deal with the paycheck that is substantially lower because of skin tone makes for a pretty uneven field in the land of equality doesn’t it?
@coolbreezed But yea, i can point to fact after fact which i’ve done. You have yet to say anything close to concrete in this debate. So unless you can offer up a real reason to dispute the obvious, i’ll consider this issue settled. A better course of action would actually be to dispute anything Wise has stated and offer facts that support your argument. Remember, opinions arent facts.
@libknocker Well… think about it like this, Tim Wise can be upset on the same basic level as anybody can about an issue that disturbs them. The fact that he gives context and factual basis to what many black people would simply call “racist” is a good thing. He also helps whites by letting them know how exactly they benefit from some aspects of a racist society, but also be left crippled and defenseless by other aspects. And he’s Jewish man, they get their fare share of racism too.
@ThisPageStaysREAL Have you noticed that you are the one who has not offered one explanation to counter anything i’ve said, much less Wise’s factual explanation for the disproportionate demographics in the prison system. You can dismiss everything as you wish, but the fact remains you havent put one drop of evidence that supports your view in the bucket. Simply saying “blacks commit more crime” is not even within eyesight of “frail” as far as this goes.
@coolbreezed In short, (too late i know) the only fact reguarding the disparities that makes any sense on earth, is the one thats actually fact. Police focus on minorities. If you think police are shaking down everybody at the same rate, but only blacks yield any type of arrestable criminal findings you would be horribly misled. The only way you may understand it is like this; If McDonalds is inspected weekly for any violations, but TacoBell only annually, McD’s will show far more violations.
@coolbreezed Also, I dont think Tim Wise stirs up any tension at all. I think he should be respected by more people by doing what most cant. Which is to put in context exactly what it is that racism actually consists of for minorities as a whole. To dismiss what he says as self serving clearly says something about your perception of reality. If holding whites to a higher standard by exposing what white privilege means isnt a challenge of character in every way, im not sure what is.
@coolbreezed I have factually stated an intentional over reprensentated police presense in black areas. I have explained in truth how campaign contributions play huge roles on policies, Same way AIPAC and other lobbies by washington, being naive is to think perhaps as you do. Do you think Tim Wise is lying? Or that I need to present you with names of officials who sit on the boards of directors who directly benefit from high numbers of incarcerated people? Or is what im saying to much to fathom?
@coolbreezed Actually, as i told you before you can get the link to the Dept of Justice bureau of statistics in the article description of my latest article. Also, these arent “ideas” man. These are facts, which are in the open for anybody not basing their ideas on fantasy. The simple fact that there are 300 million whites in the US, vs roughly 30 million blacks, yet the prison population is 65-70% black is something even hellen keller would notice as “a bit odd” What other facts can i provide?
@coolbreezed First of all, by that logic one is far more likely to be incarcerated due to possession of meth amphedimine with intent to distribute than one is due to simply smoking a blunt. I hope you’re not trying to imply every black person is arrested for crack possession with intent, vs the peaceful weed only white person. That last comment strays dangerously close to trolling, which would be a shame man.
@coolbreezed By dangerous, i’m saying something visable/written can be avoided/re-written etc. Case in point, Jim Crow laws. If there were a law for example saying redheads cant work at banks, it would offer the redhead a chance in court, or to witness the change of that law. However, if it were unspoken/unwritten the redhead would be placed in a far more disadvantaged position. Proving in fact that “redhair” was the sole factor for denial would be almost impossible. agreed?
@coolbreezed You would think it would be illegal to single out people for crime right? Sadly those who have the ability to blow the whistle wont, for a few key reasons. 1, the political world of kickbacks and donations, fund raising, elections etc. Those who control the activity of police and where they look* are instructed to do so by a higher up, and so on. To the DA, to the Mayor, to the Governor to the Senator. (who probably owes his election to contributions from the corp. prison sector.)
@coolbreezed So you see, the crackdown in black areas serves many purposes in terms of financial gain for a racist institution like the prison industry. You hand out weed tickets and various others in a certain community which in fact is simply creating a “history” starting from a young age. There are more, and higher quality drugs in the better areas,But the guilty there dont fit the right profile to generate profit, or the carefully constructed stereotype of what the criminal looks like.
@coolbreezed As you indeed missed my point. Your talking about lenght of sentence, which has little if nothing to do with who is locked up for drugs. The particulars of the case is irrelevant. The “war on drugs” was never a serious attempt to combat drugs, it was to kickstart the privatized prison industry. I think you might be unclear on the fact that the US houses 25% of the worlds total prison population. Also, there are more blacks in jail in the US, than there are in the rest of the world.
@coolbreezed No.. take marijuana for example. Illegal in most all places right? Well if the police focus their efforts on only black or latino areas to find weed, obviously the arrests and number of those in prison for weed in that area will reflect that. Which they do. Check out the DOJ bureau of statistics numbers. You can find them in the description to the latest article that plays on my page if you like.
@coolbreezed The proof is that after 1965, change in crime rates have been almost indistinguishable by race. Meaning no major increase or decrease among racisl demographics. What did change since then, is the major allocation of funds and focus by the police into minority areas. So in other words, crime is where you find it, or choose to look. Thus if you only focus on certain areas, those you arrest will reflect that area. There is no excuse to “blame others”. The truth should be understood.
@coolbreezed Another form is pay differences between races of equally qualified persons of different ethnicity. Wiki has a great article/page on that subject. If you google “income inequality in the US” you will see the wikipedia page with various quoted sources that document huge differences in pay for whites vs others reguardless of educational level. it compares them side by side from HS graduate up to PhD. These kind of things arent written in laws etc, thus they are truly dangerous.
@Bianca12952 — I am sorry, but your comments are confusing…There are certainly all manner of programs which exist and are targeted specifically towards women — these include all types of affirmative action programs as well (do a Google search)..I do not mean to sound at all unsympathetic to your circumstance, but please do try to posit a misleading and irrelevant contrast with the mass, historical oppression and exclusion of blacks and some other oppressed groups in our nation. thanks
Interesting points raised. It was mostly an emotional argument, but he did have some good points. Though I have never seen a 400 old white guy run anywhere… He said something to the effect of “Unless an alternative solution can be found…” How about treating people equally, not giving benefits based on financial or economic status, and going based on academic or athletic ability.
You must be a child or really young. For that, I will be gentle for now. I want you to know your comment is ignorant. PLEASE elaborate which Countries are the “White Countries”. Do you know that some of your “white Countries” were actually populated with people of color, not necessarily black, before white people populated it? So, that would make white people the integrators, am I correct? Your assessment is VERY MUCH incorrect and I encourage you to read more and learn real history. 🙂
??????? The issue of a court hearing is determining the facts and the law. We are very far apart on those two issues aren’t we. So debate is only a rhetorical exercise to promote an ideology. Let’s instead have a forum where a complete exposition, invesitgation, discovery is made regarding White genocide, the endangerment, decline of Whites and the forced replacement/overlayment of non-whites upon white populations. Now that’s an idea whose time as nearly come.
“Can’t you see the difference between them and the Whites of Europe, North Americas, and Australia?” No, I cannot, especially not from an eastern European. And these “Theories” have a significant scientific backing, unlike your description of “White” Latinos have been considered White since the 1920’s You are essentially considering SPANISH people not White? Northern Africans are also White. Sorry, you don’t pick and choose.
So you want to discuss why anti-whites are determined to suppress the issue of White genocide? Discussion of solutions to reverse the severe decline of the white race and what solutions you will allow us whites to use in the attempts to save the White race? Discussion of govt/media promotion of assimilation and race mixing? You want to discuss these issues in a forum? Your opposition to the investigation of White genocide and the spreading of this message is overt. Using “facts”to mislead public
Uh no. I know people from the Middle East, an Egyptian and an Iranian, they have always considered themselves White and are considered such by the U.S. Go look up pictures of Berbers and Iranians. Now tell me if you can distinguish them from a Turk or a Greek. Are you meaning to tell me that you know MORE than said anthropologists, and consider “Arab” a race? White is analogous to Caucasian. Caucasians are 51%, Whites are 51%.
Controversy is good. The issue is the right of free public discussion surrounding the issue of White genocide. Power to call witnesses and demand documents You need to tell us why you want to suppress discussion of this issue. Tell us what the possible solutions for the severe decline of the White race and the pressures to force non-white hordes upon all White countries. What can we do to stop the govt programs that foster assimilation and racial blending. do you have answers to these questions?
Not really. From the 50’s-90’s (when most Asian immigrants came here) the government showed preference towards educated and skilled Asian immigrants, so even if they weren’t wealthy, they brought with them the tools necessary to build wealth and worked from there. In comparison to east asians, southeast asians tend to be much poorer than average and more in line with hispanic immigrants for many of the same reasons.
Though 10 % of the U.S. civilian labor force, African-Americans are 18 % of U.S. government workers. They are 25 % of the employees at Treasury and Veterans Affairs, 31 % of the State Department, 37 % of Department of Education employees and 38 % of Housing and Urban Development. They are 42 % of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 55 % of the employees at the Government Printing Office and 82 % at the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency.
If anything Africa should be broken up into regions, some, say six . There was interaction between “supra SA ” and Sub Saharan Africa also the Sahel region (modern terms btw) because the desert was not always that large during the human occupation of that land.When you factor migratory patterns, language distribution, dna, culture. Africa is the most diverse continent on the planet. People have a fix view of the continent without knowing the history and then make such claims.
By your definition, “Lack of impediment” is the same as “advantage over others.” Under this formulation, one is best off being white. Truth is, for one group to be disadvantaged requires another group to be advantaged. They’re relative terms. It may be hard to own that you’re a part of an oppressive system, because that means admitting that more than personal merit is boosting you. But it’s a necessary step.
Don’t call me a fool. You know nothing about me. Being liberal has nothing to do with the ideas that people have about race issues. You saying that tells me that you already have preconceived ideas of who I am and what I believe. Don’t make stupid assumptions because you don’t agree with me. The only reason whiteness exists, is to defend the privilege that people gain from it. It’s a social position, and if you don’t believe that, don’t call me a liar and fool. Prove me wrong.
…and that’s where you are wrong Bob Johnson. Most black people do not see “you” as an enemy. Don’t take stuff personal. No one blames “you” for slavery, inequality or anything else. It’s not about you as an individual…it’s about a system that, even though strides have been made…is still not totally equal…especially when it comes to the justice system…And many black people, including myself, know that we are not doing everything that WE can as a whole to better our situation.
I’m not gonna keep going back and forth. Fact is…we will always see this from 2 different points of view. That’s the main reason why Black history is not taught in depth in schools (without taking a class in college)…because in order to talk about what we fought for you have to acknowledge who we fought against. You ever see the documentary on Hiroshima? The pilot who dropped the bomb said “it happened so fast!”. The lady on the ground said “it seemed like forever”. Different viewpoints
As for me, personally, I’ve helped several black people. I used to give one guy a ride to work. I’ve given money to them on the streets, etc. But I’ve also had thousands of dollars taken out of my taxes and put toward programs designed to benefit blacks. But think of all the white teachers, social workers, actors and academics, as well as white politicians who have made it their mission to help black folks. Then there are all the predominantly white churches who try to help the urban poor.
I am American, and I am Black. I do agree with the last part of your passage, and that’s all I agree with. What makes you better then me? what makes me better then you? where we live? how we speak? who happens to be in charge? Nothing does, only personal moral character, and personal advanced thought. If most Americans could we would cease all war, but that’s not the case. The Americans who don’t troll the internet, and comment nonsense, are mostly the ones who try to make a diff in the world.
@whiteagent1977 Well,are you talking about the NBA or any sports league?In my working experience many companies do like increasing their diversity.A lot of them will have company website photos of their diverse staff.IT firms are filled with nonwhites like Asians and Indians.People in HR tend to be from Liberal arts background and so their mentality is get a diverse workforce.So the accusation of white guy over black if all is equal seems suspect.
@QuantumMaths Well besides the fact that Black African immigrants are graduating at higher rates than those of Asians and Whites should be enough to prove theres a racial bias. Wikipedia Not to mention the fact that when we Africans asked for equal education here in the states all we recieved were public schools, community colleges and trade schools you people call universities. No all black medical, law/poli sci schools or schools of science and industry just agriculture and general labor.
@QuantumMaths Brother if what your saying is true knowing Africans earn the highest degree attainment than that over whites and Asians. Harvard should be filled with Asians and Africans not whites. If what your saying is true why is it blacks here in America need help and not Africans? Schools from public to private would all be universal and teaching the same criteria. They don’t because someone figures intellectually one of our races shouldn’t have equal competition.
@MegaWinnieGirl No I don’t. Wise consistently says that all white people are privileged and that is the very opposite of under-privileged. Unlike WISE, who really is privileged, I was born into a working class family and have faced most of the barriers that blacks and other minorities face every day. I am pretty sure that Wise doesn’t have a black family in his entire zip code and if he did he would move. I live in a VERY diverse area and I can tell you NONE of us here are privileged.
@MegaWinnieGirl I am tired of him telling me how privileged I am, like I didn’t have to work for anything and that I am wealthy. There are also places in the US where the majority is black and whites are underprivileged, such as Philadelphia, the very place I live. Most of the whites have fled Philadelphia for the suburbs, Jersey and Delaware. Philadelphia now has 1 million fewer residents (from 2.5m to 1.5m in 40 years) and is almost entirely run by blacks.
@oddtreenow2 I don’t think anyone can simply assume that someone doesn’t deserve his/her spouse. It’s up to the spouse to decide. Also, it’s true that some minorities who don’t work as hard or are not as skilled leak through, but MOST non-minorities have access to more opportunities. Holding non-minorities to higher standards because of their resources encourages them to take advantage of their resources to the fullest extent and become even better workers. Minorities get a bit more hope too.
@sue01234567890 But that was of the old testament and he didn’t mean men should take that power into their own hands, God was saying that it will be destroyed, someday and it was and will be. The bible comes from African and middle eastern cultures, which was then picked up when paul wrote to the greeks to share. They took power into their own hands, it said love your enemy. They are ppl which killed falsely in the name of God.
@KumarZimmerman08 I am also guessing that you haven’t read to much of the bible either, which is understandable since all of your remarkable memory is dedicated to your detail of European history. “Whoever sacrifices to any god other than the LORD must be destroyed.” Exodus 22:20 Any city that doesn’t receive the followers of Jesus will be destroyed in a manner even more savage than that of Sodom and Gomorrah. Mark 6:11 The Crusades. Need I say more?
@KumarZimmerman08 Since the term “White” and “Racism” were not defined until the early beginnings of America, there was NEVER a collective “white identity”. Europeans would go to war and destroy other European nations for instance the hundred years’ war, Napoleonic wars, etc. Except for the occasianal alliance, they felt no brotherhood toward each other. I dont need to go into details because you are not “willfully ignorant of history”. i guess that part slipped your mind.
@coolbreezed i ask you coobreezed, what do you say about the fact that a person who is black male that has the same credit, no record, is presentable, articulate, and well mannered has less chances of renting an apartment compared to a white male with the same qualities? i’ve seen this many times before and i see the discrimination that people of color go through. would you deny this is true? you already answered that question.
@djkortezis “When something as simple as finding an apartment doesn’t require stealth planning to hide ones color, you can tell me different….” people are becoming educated in their prejudice. it’s is harder for a blacks who have the same credentials than other races. i’m asian and it’s pretty obvious to me. i have less problems talking about it now and i’m glad that i push the subject. there’s one way to learn and that’s to open communication with everyone until it’s ok to talk about.
@Joeybsmooth Here’s a nice fact: when you generalize from studies that document prejudice to statements like “All white people are privileged. All black people are disadvantaged,” you’re engaging in fallacious reasoning. Racism exists — the question is how do we fix it? I think reinforcing racial division, instead of working to close those gaps and promoting integration, is precisely the wrong thing to do. I’m not a “white” person, I’m a fucking person. Same for you.
@raptor8154 “Would I want a doctor who got into school because he was born in the correct zip code or had alumni parents…of course not.” How about neither? How about medical school admissions being determined by your academic ability? Your comment is a false dichotomy/dilemma. It isn’t “Either people get into med school based on their zip code or their parent’s alumni status.” Try again.
@raptor8154 You didn’t answer my question but instead tried to change the topic. Why am I not surprised. But go on…don’t let facts get in the way of your racist caricature of all white people. You’ve already made up your mind that we’re all wealthy, well-connected, and out to get anybody with more melanin in their skin than us. You’re obviously a pretty sophisticated thinker. Have a nice day.
According to Wise, seemingly ALL white people are privileged. Seemingly ALL black people are disabled. How is this not racist? I was raised in a white working class family with a single mother — but I’m somehow the oppressor automatically because of my race. Please, Tim Wise, tell me where I can sign up for my “white guy” benefits. I could really use that elusive privilege you keep mentioning. Let me know, okay? The point is poor is poor, regardless of race. POVERTY holds people back.
If you were having open-heart surgery would you want a surgeon chosen on the basis of his race or his test scores? Think about it. Affirmative action is insulting to both black and white people. (By the way — how do we define “black”? How about “white”? Jews weren’t always identified as white. An American with darker skin is automatically “black”? What about latinos? Silly distinctions…) Affirmative action is condescending, pie-in-the-sky nonsense. Let’s face facts.
@GoldenHawk400. nothing you’ve written actually addresses anything Tim Wise said, nor have you presented any evidence to the contrary of his position. I’m going to have to assume that you’re simply presenting an opinion, having completely bypassed the discomfort of thought. So I’ll thank you for your opinion and dismiss it for its irrelevance, lack of poignancy and your clear disdain for facts.
Lol. Those that have opportunities do not NEED a free lunch. A free lunch is not something that simply exists by virtue of its existence, a free lunch must be provided for those that cannot provide for themselves. It is the difference between a high school party– where most present are seen as friends and brothers– and a homeless soup kitchen, where those present serve third-rate leftovers across a a plexiglass sneeze guard to people who they view as “in need”.
“…as for ‘free lunch’ whites have received that by virtue of their skin color…” … genious4real This “free lunch” has a lot to do with belonging to a higher social class along with being white. This leaves out a lot of struggling white people who are turned off by this description of white priviledge and it doesn’t endear them to the fight for racial justice. It may be more accurate to say whites have more access to better educational and career networking opportunities.
ahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahah!!!! ROFL “misnomer”? What were raised in a garbage pale? English also lend a great many terms to French and German? So what now? French and German don’t exist? You need to stop hitting the pipe for a second, English is English, and everyone with half a brain knows that when they are speaking english, that senstence structure is borrowed from old german, does not make it any less a different language! can’t believe i’m arguing this point! lol
Asians excel at abstract problem resolution (math, arithmetic etc) and (surprise surprise) in real life, they also dominate accounting, mathematics, medicine, engineering etc. Blacks are gifted spacial conception, this type of learning style is best at noticing details, pitches, and rhythms that escape the normal listener. Consequently blacks are excellent at keeping tune, and are adept at turning the abstract into concrete objects. Fittingly many of them are capable of turning a buck in music.
Jean Piaget does actually agree with my previously stated broad outline of what intelligence is, he said “Intelligence is an adaptationetc” this is precisely what’s understood as intelligence- even if Piaget was reluctant to define it specifically, he did in fact define it! But to go from this and declare that there is no such thing as intelligence and indeed no such thing as IQ is simply idiocy, that not even Piaget would accept.
“psychological profession”? what the hell is that? And while some SOCIOLOGISTS (a tiny minority of them at that) argue that they cannot determine what intelligence concretely is- everyone in the field of medicine/neuroscience absolutely agrees that intelligence is a collection of specific abilities that yield in higher survivability and self actualization of an individual/ group of people. I don’t know what you’re reading that tells you that no one knows what “intelligence in” that’s nonsense
No, for people who are not immune to reason, Jews do see themselves as a separate race of people, ordained by god to be Chosen above others. I highlighted Wise’s Jewishness because of the racist and anti-egalitarian sentiment implicit in Judaism- that was my point: to show that when wise rails against the evils of racism… he’s simply being hypocritical. He only talks about white racism (which is racist in itself).
Islam also says this of blacks: Ishaq:243 “I heard the Apostle say: ‘Whoever wants to see Satan should look at Nabtal!’ He was a black man with long flowing hair, inflamed eyes, and dark ruddy cheeks…. Allah sent down concerning him: ‘To those who annoy the Prophet there is a painful doom.” (9:61) “Gabriel came to Muhammad and said, ‘If a black man comes to you, his heart is more gross than a donkey’s.'”
What people of color enslaved whites? Slavery is a European custom African people of color never adopted. Africans had servants not slaves. Servants were free to come and go as they pleased and spoke what ever languages they saw fit. As long as the work got done. They were educated and treated as human beings. Id love to know which point in history led you to believe people of color enslaved anyone?
What good would roads to hospitals do Africans who have no cars or money? Millions die daily due to colonialism and it turnes my stomach when some Euros “THINK” africans should be thankful for damage they continue to cause. If Africans use Affirmitive action to get ahead I encourage it no demand they reap the benifits. For those who died so we could. Why Affirmitive Action exists is the problem not if people outside the country can benifit from it. Education should be universal.
Your aware of Black Wall street and you still need to know why we need help? How about we go over the history of every other advanced civilization that wasn’t founded by Euros. While going over the civilizations we can determine when they came into contact with Euros while figuring out if they are doing better now then they were prior? Africans asked America for help and all we got in return was complaints from lazy Americans who get tax breaks and hand me down wealth from slavery.
And his point only applies to Whites who come from well-to-do families. If your dad is a working-class janitor or waste technician, I highly doubt those same “preferences” apply to you. And what about Asian student who come from dirt poor communities and out-perform white students? Or the African Immigrant students from dirt poor communities that out-perform almost everyone? How do these people factor into your claim that the sky would fall without racial preference?
Affirmative Action is an insult to me. In my opinion, this is some of the most racist rhetoric you can find in Academia, (aside from advocating the Bell Curve) because basically what he is saying is that Black people aren’t smart enough to do without racial preferences, that without AA we would somehow be reverted back to 1965 in terms of economic and educational success. And what disturbs me even more is that Black folks actually agree with him! Do you really think our success is riding on AA?
Actually Africans colonized various parts of Europe. Man where have you been. Like I said before Africans ran the Medierranean Sea, Cushites, Colchians, and Khazars were all African people as described by other Europeans who were at times educated by said Africans. Unless you can provide dates and evidence proving Europeans ruled at that time. If not accept Africans civilized you people not once but we forgave you and rescued you 3 times. Now here comes the forth…
You are aware that Greece was built for and by in the image of Kemet sir so your only further proving my point. The oldest Ancient civilizations in Europe are closest to Africa and were built using African ways of building. How is it that structures in Greece and Rome were built with Cement and Mortar an African invention? Also the structures were built using Colums another African way of building structures. This proves who built Greece and Rome AFRICAN PEOPLE. Black Power
Africans were here in the states first. We sailed the pacific thousands of years before Black African Moors nursed 1/3 of you people back to health from dying of plague. Everything about you people you owe to the black man. Jews adopted African traditions and ways of worship which is why they are so successful. Other Euros should take notes not only from Jews but Africans who still live in the bush. Watch, in the future EVERYONE’S eventually going to go back to the old ways living in the bush
i am a wight middle class seinior with a 3.8 gpa a did acceptionaly well on the act. my friend is a black middle class seinior that has a 3.2 gpa and did pretty good on the act. we both applied for the same scholorship i reseved nothin he is attending snow colege free of charge due to afermitive action how is that fare tim how were the odds stacked against my friend? i worked harder and becaus his skin is a different color he reseved more is this not racism?
So, are you suggesting that we should do nothing to address past and present white privilege? Are you suggesting that there should be no counterweight to the weight of white privilege that Tim Wise points out using factual evidence? I can understand you arguing against affirmative action if you present an alternative way to address white privilege and the disadvantages it presents for minorities. However, if you have no better alternative, how can I respect your argument?
Don’t think you can intimidate me because You think I’m 21 years old. That’s not very mature of you. You seem to be thinking in a very Lineair, black and white way. If you had listened to Mrs Aung, she admits that most of the asian families That succeed came from well-to-do families from Asia. +they had strong communities and culture/economic means etc. +they weren’t discriminated against so systematically. +our money system is a pyramid, someone inevitably will end @ the bottom
If you listen closely to what this man is saying – he is declaring himself a racist. Beside the fact that his statistics are off, he agree with judging people by the color of their skin. If you want to say we still need affirmative action after Obama has become president, you’re saying that we should still give ‘blacks’ an equal opportunity in the country because there are still things a ‘black’-man cannot achieve because hes’s ‘Black’… (like become president?).
Are you kidding. People everywhere and of all colors ate grass dirt etc. My great grandparents that came from Germany ended up in Iowa. Do you know what they did with their first crop of corn? They burned it. Farmers all over did that to try and drive up the price since they were basically trying to create a shortage. It didnt work. They were stuck in the Dust Bowl with nothing. Not even their own crop they did eat gradd and roots etc. Blacks werent singled out by the Depression.
My great grandparents sold nearly everything in their posession to get here. Then bought land on almost all credit. 40% of families that did that would fail. They were lucky and somehow managed to make it work. More whites than blacks benefited from it sure. However thats irrelevent. It was totally open to blacks as well and several thousand did get their 160 acre plot. Its just most of the land available was to the west of states like Iowa ans Missouri.
The 270,000,000 acres up for grabs was only about 10% or less of what the US would become in total. Yet he says 40,000,000 million people directly benefit today from it? Theres 300,000,000 in the nation today. 40,000,000 is less than 15% of that. So 10% of the land which the act gave up helps just over 10% of the population. Ok but its not even all whites. He really needs to research what he talks about before going into a speech about it.
Even if a school doesnt offer an AP class at the school itself. By law as long as the student has pretty much at least C average the school district has to pay for them to go to the local community college to attend an AP class there. Since thats all an AP class is. Just one for college credit. In most cases even if the student fails the class the school district still pays but sometimes if you fail you have to pay. Theres no excuse and Mr.Wise is just offering excuses.
Mabye, the only thing that trips me out is why hes never been on national TV or the news? How come none of our black leaders know about this man and let the world know what he knows? Also spoke up on if what hes saying is true and how it affects our people? I hope im not being rude but going through your articles I peeped out your funnys and saw you have alot of Ikea vids. Why do women like Ikea so much?
No, its a misreading of statistics is what it is, especially when you take into account that Hispanics are included in many of these white victim stats, and since latinos and blacks often live in close proximity to one another, the likelyhood of cross victimization rises. Also, like I said, stats in crimes such as these are impacted that the liklihood of coming across a potential victim. Because of population density, both black crims and white crims are likely to have white victims, period.