Do Feminists Have To Be Vegetarians Katherine George?

Kathryn Paxton George’s recent publication, Animal, Vegetable, or Woman?, is the culmination of over a decade of work and encompasses standard and original arguments against the feminist-vegetarian connection. This article defends the feminist-vegetarian connection against George’s challenges, arguing that her key arguments are deeply flawed, antithetical to basic feminist commitments, and beg the question against fundamental aspects of the connection.

The question of whether feminists should be vegetarians is paramount, as the eating of lesh is considered the chief cause of oppression to nonhuman animals. However, Kathryn Paxton George’s “Should Feminists Be Vegetarians?” exhibits a startling lack of awareness about consumption and the association between smallness, lightness, and leanness among vegetarians, with these characteristics being more pronounced among the older, more knowledgeable feminists.

One of the few feminists who has argued against the feminist-vegetarian connection is Kathryn Paxton George. While she maintains that nonhuman animals are not humans, many feminists who do eat animal products are mostly unaware that an argument that says, yes, feminists should be vegan is “yes”. The answer to Kathryn Paxton George’s question, “Should Feminists Be Vegetarians?” is “Yes”, despite her arguments to the contrary.

In conclusion, Kathryn Paxton George’s recent publication, Animal, Vegetable, or Woman?, presents a comprehensive critique of the feminist-vegetarian connection, highlighting the flaws in her arguments and the need for more awareness about the ethical implications of vegetarianism.