OLED monitors are not ideal for productivity work due to poor text clarity and potential burn-in. However, they can be suitable for low-light conditions and bright rooms. Choose between QD-OLED and WOLED monitors depending on your use case, with QD-OLED being better suited for low-light conditions and WOLED showing strengths in bright rooms.
OLED monitors can be less taxing on eyes if used dark mode in applications, as there is no backlight. However, they tend to have aggressive auto dimming to prevent burn-in. New 4K 32″ OLED monitors are coming out starting in March with better pixel layouts for productivity and burn-in reduction features like task bar dimming. Although OLED monitors are primarily designed for gaming and entertainment, they can also handle productivity tasks. MSI offers a new 4K 32″ OLED starting in March with better pixel layout for productivity and even more burn-in reduction features like task bar dimming.
Over the last month, people have been intentionally using a 4K OLED monitor in ways that will cause permanent burn-in. Any burn in current panels will not be relevant for panels available in 4-5 years time as technology will continue to evolve. Auto-dimming on OLED monitors can struggle to keep up, known as temporal luminance stability. In general, OLED displays provide brighter, crisper displays on electronic devices and use less power than conventional LEDs or other displays.
The biggest OLED problem is burn-in, which is a significant issue for most OLED monitors. The Dell model mentioned does not calibrate, but even so, it does offer better font clarity and productivity.
📹 I used my OLED monitor for 1,223 hours
The video follows a user’s experience with an OLED monitor after 1,223 hours of use. The user explores potential issues like burn-in, color degradation, and brightness loss, and shares their findings and observations. The video also touches on the evolving software support for OLED displays and the impact on text quality.
What is the lifespan of an OLED monitor?
The projected lifetime of an OLED in televisions is 100, 000 hours, with an average usage of 8 hours per day. Despite issues like black spots, burn-in, and pixel failure, advancements in OLED technology, such as glove boxes and spin coaters, have improved device lifespan. Other factors affecting OLED lifespan include temperature effects, brightness, dark spots, blue OLEDs, encapsulation, improved components, and new fabrication methods.
What is the lifespan of OLED monitors?
The projected lifetime of an OLED in televisions is 100, 000 hours, considering an average usage of 8 hours per day. Despite issues like black spots, burn-in, and pixel failure, advancements in OLED technology, such as glove boxes and spin coaters, have improved device lifespan. Other factors affecting OLED lifespan include temperature effects, brightness, dark spots, blue OLEDs, encapsulation, improved components, and new fabrication methods. Both researchers and consumers are interested in OLEDs’ longevity.
What is the problem with OLED screens?
The quality of these devices is exceptional in terms of contrast and color accuracy; however, they do have one notable drawback. Another disadvantage of OLED technology is the phenomenon of burn-in, or OLED screen burn, which occurs when the outline of an image remains on the screen, causing discoloration.
Why don’t monitors use OLED?
OLED burn-in is a common issue with OLED displays, hindering their widespread acceptance as PC monitors. This problem occurs when the taskbar on the Windows desktop gets burned into the panel. OLEDs have solutions like pixel shifting, pixel cleaning, and screen savers to address this issue. However, these methods can be annoying, as the Asus test rig constantly reminds users to run their pixel cleaning run, causing them to lose their screen for a few minutes. This can also be a pain when using the KTC OLED as a second screen, as it has to go into screen saver mode when not directly using the display for a short time.
Do OLED screens burn out?
OLED technology, known for its stunning visuals and deep blacks, is susceptible to burn-in and pixel failure. Researchers and consumers are concerned about the longevity of OLEDs, which are influenced by factors such as advanced features, material availability, fabrication issues, and the blue pixel problem. To enjoy OLED’s benefits without permanent damage, it is essential to understand and apply preventive measures.
Is OLED display good for long term?
Liquid crystal display (LCD) technology offers longer operational lifespans and is less susceptible to burn-in, a phenomenon whereby a permanent image is retained on organic light-emitting diode (OLED) displays. Furthermore, they provide higher refresh rates, which are of particular importance to gamers, as they facilitate the appearance of games as smooth and responsive. This is particularly relevant for those seeking to circumvent burn-in complications.
Should I avoid OLED?
OLED burn-in is not a myth, as TV manufacturers equip OLEDs with preventative measures. However, it is not a serious concern if you watch TV under normal conditions. An airport TV might be marred by a phantom CNN logo, but it is only dealing with that problem because it is tuned to CNN for several consecutive hours per day. Most TVs at home are tuned to CNN for several hours per day, so you wouldn’t watch a lot of static imagery for your OLED TV to be at risk. If you use your OLED TV as a monitor, you are at higher risk of burn-in than the average consumer.
Is an OLED monitor worth it for productivity?
OLED (Old Energy Display) monitors are prone to burn-in when exposed to static elements over time, making them not ideal for work purposes. However, using the monitor for varied usages reduces the risk of burn-in. The choice between OLED monitors depends on features and price. New OLED monitors in 2024 include QD-OLED and WOLED models in various sizes, resolutions, and refresh rates. QD-OLEDs offer better picture quality with more vivid colors and brighter highlights, but blacks may appear purple in bright rooms.
WOLED may be a better choice if this bothers you. Over 325 monitors have been tested and ranked for their best features. For gaming monitors, 4k HDR monitors, Mini LED monitors, and OLED TVs, check out our recommendations.
Do OLED screens degrade over time?
Screen burn, also known as burn-in, is an effect where part of an image that is no longer displayed
is still visible over subsequent images. This can take the form of static graphics that stay on the screen when running timecode, watching news channels, or playing video games. Tests by influential technology reviews site RTINGS found that screen burn can set in as quickly as two years after buying a new OLED television or monitor.
The tests found that the TVs were most affected by burn-in when they were set to maximum brightness and were showing gaming content and news channels, as both types of content often feature static graphics on screen. After 4000 hours, the TVs testing this content displayed the mark of these logos on screen, even when the content was no longer being played.
The organic material in OLED TVs (OLED stands for “Organic Light Emitting Diode”) potentially wears out over time. Samsung decided to stop using OLED technology in its TVs in 2012 and proceeded to develop the new QLED technology. Samsung claims that its QLED TV picture quality lasts for the lifetime of the product, without any visible deterioration in color over time, due to the advanced Quantum dot technology. Samsung QLED and LED TV sets have received a perfect score (10/10) for image retention in RTINGS’ test.
This impartial tests seem to prove that Samsung’s QLED and Dynamic Crystal Colour UHD TVs are not susceptible to screen burn like other TVs and potentially monitors on the market. An article released by ZDNet reported that the sales of LG Display, the world’s largest LCD maker, have plummeted, leaving the company in distress. Samsung is offering a market-leading ten-year screen burn warranty as a testament to the confidence in its QLED technology.
Can you use OLED monitors for work?
MSI OLED Care offers features that combat burn-in, rendering OLED monitors suitable for both professional and recreational use. Despite the perception that burn-in is a significant issue with OLED technology, this solution provides a compelling argument for its use in both work and leisure contexts.
What is the downside of OLED monitor?
OLED displays are more expensive and have a shorter lifespan than LED displays, which can lead to color and brightness issues. Both LEDs and OLEDs convert electrical energy into visible light through electroluminescence, but OLEDs are more reliable and produce light without heat. They are best known for their use in TV displays. OLEDs have built on existing LED technology and require specialized equipment for precise manufacturing. While OLEDs are superior in several ways, they have not replaced LEDs.
Both technologies exist alongside each other, making it important to understand the differences between them. Both technologies are adapted into various display technologies, but OLEDs are more reliable and produce light without heat.
📹 OLED vs IPS – 3 Months Later.
OLED vs. IPS. The final verdict. need a new wallpaper? https://optimum.store/products/shift-wallpaper-pack Video gear Camera: …
this is the type of content we need. Im so on the brink of buying oled but I work from home 3 days a week. (so not even fulltime). besides that I game about 11-20 hours per week. this kind of article makes me feel more easy to use it for both office and gaming. I rarely use anything without dark mode so I feel confident I can survive many years without disturbing image retention
I have used the same Monitor for 3151 hours and I have had two instances where the pixels just got stuck, there was a red line, the second one just happened last week. All I had to do was a manual image cleaning from the Monitor’s settings and it was good as new. No Visible Burns in whatsoever and it just runs perfectly.
I’ve used an LG C1 as a Monitor from January 2022 til October 2023, since I’m quite addicted and also did home office from it, it was on for like 10-14h per day on average (yes, it hurts to type these numbers…), so probably over 8000h in total (speaking of active use time with content displayed) I had a screensaver set to black that kicked in after 10 minutes of inactivity, and screen-off after 30 minutes, just for the rare case that I forget about it. I really didn’t care for the panel at all lol, even disabled the annoying auto dimming in the service menu, had a static task bar and my browser window in the same place every single day. Really the only good thing I did for it was that I left it below 25% brightness all the time because I just can’t stand bright screens. So… This shouldn’t sound like I recommend treating your OLED screen as terribly as I did, but I really can’t find any sign of Burn in whatsoever, even on 100% brightness with these special test images for different color combinations. But I guess it’s possible that my 100% brightness isn’t what it used to be, after all those automatic pixel refreshes that happen after 4h use time once you turn off the screen. But 100% brightness is still WAAAAAY to bright for me, so even if that’s the case, it won’t matter for me for a long time, something else will probably die before that.
I used my C1 (with the stronger WBE panel) exclusively for gaming at minimum brightness and after a year I already had traces of burn-in in the lower grey range. It’s not visible in normal usage but it’s defo burn-in. And sticking my nose in I can still see faint lines. So I’d never use OLED for productivity.
I’m not a person who have a patience to bother about monitor safety – I like keeping my ips monitors turned on for longer and I don’t want to change wallpapers, icons lay out and hide the task bar. I use my pc for about 5 hours per day on avarage but it happens that I do much longer sessions (up to 12 hours). If there is risk of burn in just after 1-2 years of intense usage it’s a huge No No for me. Monitors should last at least 4-5 years if not much longer. That’s why I appreciate all these tests because I wouldn’t want to regret a purchase that is so expensive 🙏 I’m planning on switching to 1440p this or next year but I’m not in a hurry and might choose an IPS panel instead. Gonna be patient and wait for technology to develop a bit more. These OLEDs are still far from perfect. Would be cool to see MicroLED monitors one day…
I have this monitor for about 6 months with 1200 hours, LG27GR95QE-B, i have used it for playing MMO’s such as WOW/FFXIV with static user interface, I tried running these color articles and sadly there is a little bit of image retention that does not go away with either of Image or pixel cleaning, i wasn’t having pixel shifting on and brightness was always at 100%. So if you really want to play MMOs with an OLED try hiding the user interface as much as you can if you don’t use it. Also avoid having brightness at 100% for SDR, 70% will be around 100 nits which is more than enough and make sure to toggle on pixel shifting. Nevertheless, The image retention is only visible with a bright white screen and it’s very minor and not and not noticeable in games or movies. The monitor still looks as beautiful as it is on Day 1 😘
1 year, 1200 /356, that is about 3h a day . No one that runs YT website and edits and games does 3h PC time, no one, so please do not lie . Far as i can see these are barely if 1 year old . At that its too small 27inch, give me a break, its not even 4K, 300 nits … i would not buy that because for same money you can get 48inch 120hz OLED TV, why go for 27 inch 240hz 300 nits, only advantage it has is 240hz, and you can achieve that in most games, nor can you notice the difference between 120hz and 240hz not even in competitive gaming, impossible . This stinks to high haven . I trust its an early test model you do display reviews and have changed i dont even count how much displays, you show very little knowledge for even having one, but that i can believe, that is common, its just for sales . And you are not the one who clocked in anything on it, maybe few hours, you got it like that, and probably dont even have it any more .
I got mine back close to release January 2023. And I have 2615 hours on it at 100% brightness, contrast 60, black stabilizer 0, sharpness 100. As far as I can tell there is no issues with the monitor by looking at it. With a grey background there isn’t anything I can see that looks like a burnt in image.
My usecase is 10 hours of screen on time a day, so 1200 hours would be a mere 4 months for me. I guess I still stay with “only use my OLED Monitor for gaming and fullscreen vids and leave basically every other application far away from it”. I plan to use my OLED monitor for a few years and I don’t want to risk permanent retention shadows on it after a year (which would be triple the amount of general usage as demonstrated by techless). Still, I do like to see real life experiences with OLED screens like shown in this article
My 2018 LG OLED television with approximately 15,000 hours of use is now littered with artifacts including a bright green logo in the right top of the screen (visible in any orange, red or brown background) and some faint grey logos in the middle left (only vaguely visible in very specific situations). Of course that’s an older generation and not a PC monitor, but I would be hesitant about buying an OLED monitor with a 3 year burn-in warranty.
Tbh, I’m not overly concerned about burn in on my oled. I use it a lot, but the image cleaning, pixel shift and other burn in protocols combined with the use of MLA should mean that by the time I need a replacement panels should be considerably more affordable and resilient to burn issues. I don’t want my enjoyment of the panel to be hampered by a fear of burn in so I’m using it as freely as I did my previous IPS monitor. Brightness is set to 100% for hdr content and 70% for sdr. I do turn the screen off if I’m away from it for more than several minutes and have the screen saver settings activated. I have a laptop for productivity work so the screen is only utilised for gaming and the occasional article playback. The picture quality gains more than make up for the shortened lifespan of the panel imo.
Nice article. Thanks for the insight. However, I am afraid that all this is non-telling as 1.2k hours is nothing. Also, there is not enough data to evaluate how continuous use is affecting burn-in. Are two days per week of 9 to 5 the same as ~2h every day per week? People expect to use their monitors for multiple 10k hours. 1k without problems is the bare minimum, really. I would like to have another article like this in two years.
I work from home for 10 hours a day, then game an average of 4 or 5 more. At least 15 hours a day. I also use my PC overnight for rendering. I would hit 5000 hours in my first year and two thirds of that would be with static app elements from my CAD software on screen. I’m about to drop the cash on one of the new 32 inch 240hz OLEDS. Should be interesting to see how they handle a super heavy duty cycle. Luckily they have a 2 year warranty..
great article and good to see more burn in tests being done. So far this confirms what rtings has already found out and that being that WOLED Panels are harder to burn in than QD-OLED Panels most likely due to the extra white sub pixel. I do wonder how well one of those new 3rd Gen QD-OLEDs would do under the same conditions.
I couldn’t tolerate this monitor within 1-2 minutes my eyes and brain started to hurt, hours and it was massive pain, i used it for 12 hours tried everything and the pain lasted 1 week upon discontinuation, it is individual sensitivity to the DC Dimming brightness flickering at the frequency of 240hz (10% brightness drop flicker(at 100% brightness), 25% brightness drop flicker(at 50% brightness), 33% brightness drop flicker (at 0% brightness)), so yes even if it doesn’t have OLED PWM 10% of people still suffer from eye fatigue/pain and migraines. You could assign this DC Dimming values to the IEEE STANDARD PAR1789 PWM chart using the frequency 240hz and the modulation % as the width of the line of lowered brightness (about 18%), using these values you get a value a couple pixels inside of the red HIGH RISK range, bad for your eyes, or rather my eyes(it could be scotopic sensitivity, or called Irlen syndrome)
I have the same monitor. I think with its conservative brightness levels, I’m gonna guess that this particular model will last a bit longer before burn-in issues arise. Also, the way that the compensation cycles are implemented by LG on their OLED TVs and this monitor is generally reliable and more robust compared to their competitors (on the TV market at least). Competing 1440p monitors like the ASUS PG27AQDM, or even QD-OLED ultrawides like the AW3423DW/AW3423DWF might suffer from burn-in a little quicker due to the higher brightness. But time will tell I guess. Unfortunately, I can’t find a logo detection setting/logo brightness dimming on this monitor, which is a shame.
I have over 3000k hours on my Alienware dwf 34″ qd-oled. I use it over 8 hours a day for work and gaming. I skip the pixel refresh that’s required every 4 hours because it’s annoying. I do one pixel refresh a day. Have done 3 panel refreshes “just did my third a few days ago” and have zero burn in. I leave it in hdr mode 24/7 at 75% sdr brightness in windows. It’s been a tank of a monitor. I leave it on static imagines all the time for work also. It has two dead pixels but it was that way out of the box and every single monitor I’ve ever had has dead or stuck pixels so It doesn’t trigger me like it does to other people who will go to the end of the earth to get a new monitor. It’s not right I get that and agree but the return process isn’t worth a dead pixel. I rather have a dead pixel than a stuck red or green pixel. My old pos lg 34gn850 had stuck pixels and kept getting more over the years.
I have had my Alienware AW3423DW since Oct 2022. It has been used daily for at least 3 hours even up to 48 hours sometimes. But about 6 hours on average would result in about 3200 hours of usage so far. Unfortunately i was not paying as much attention as i should and had the taskbar enabled and just started noticing darker spots on dark grey loading screens where the icons are at. At closer investigation on a plain grey screen the most noticable is the 21:9 to 16:9 difference since i have been perusal lots of articles. The seperation is clearly visible there but not on any other color. As soon as any pictures are shown its all gone though. I still love the view every day and cant wait to use Alienwares guarantee to replace the burnin within 3 years after purchase. So basically next year i will have a new panel for free ^^
I usually use my monitor an average of 14 hours daily (work/pleasure) so in a month I’m putting a little more of 400 hours, I REALLY really wanted an OLED monitor for my last monitor purchase, but spending quite a bit more than $1000 USD for something that has a burn in warranty of 3 years seems a lot of money per year of warranty to me, so I ended buying an IPS ultrawide LG 38″ curved monitor, so far really happy with it, maybe OLED burn in is just an stigma??
There’s going to be a refresh of 27GR95QE called 27GS95QE in February with apparently more brightness and less ABL otherwise same resolution and refresh rate. I think that everyone should go for the next gen OLED’s at this point though. I have over 300 h on my GR95QE since buying it in December. I’ll definitely try to warranty mine for the dead pixel that I noticed afterwards.
I’m sorry 8 hours per week is very low. People who would pay this much for a display definitely spend more time playing. IMO OLED will never be worth it until burn in is not an issue. I still have my first 144hz TN display that is around 10 years old now and it functions perfectly and it is still worth some money in 2024. Burned-in OLED is worth nothing. So can OLED displays/laptops last for 2-3 years without burn-in? Sure they can, but what about 5, 8, 10 years? I don’t think so. And I don’t even want to talk about annoying things you need to turn on to delay the burn-in like disappearing bars, screen dimming etc.
The problem with this kind of article is that you are in the privileged position of not really giving a damn what happens to your monitor, because you have access to a lot new tech. For many of us, 1000 CAD is a lot of money. If I’m spending this much I don’t even want burn in to be a risk at all, because not only does burn in suck, it’ll be extremely hard to sell it eventually. So we can’t afford to be reckless. This is a monitor I want to last for potentially 5-10 years. And maybe even sell eventually when upgrading. Sorry if I come off harsh, it’s good that these screens are performing well, but honestly I would certainly hope after 1000 hours nothing was bad. Come back to me after 10,000, or 20,000 hours.
I used this monitor now for 24 hours and i decided to return it. I paid around 600 USD for it and i dont feel like i got my worth. Paying a premium for a LOT of annoying things, like all the pixel care things. As I;m writing this my screen shited 1 pixel two times already. And I feel bad if i turn off a OLED care feature. Oh and Yellow pixels always have this chromatic abberation very visible so it just doesnt look like proper 2K. And the monitor flickers like crazy sometimes. I would stay away from oled for now.
My own LG OLED (same model) that I bought the day they became available recently broke (on Dec. 22, to be exact) so I got a replacement for it on December 23. My replacement already has 455 hours on-time 😂 I don’t even wanna know how much on-time my previous one had. To be clear, the previous one didn’t break due to burn in or something. There was a short circuit or something and it fried the board. (at least that’s my conclusion after pondering the evidence for an hour). Either way neither my previous one nor my current one show any sign of burn-in, tho my current one has a rather nasty horizontal streak of “dirty screen effect” right near the top third of the screen which in some circumstances can be very visible, whereas the old one had a flawless panel.
I wish the VRR brightness flicker would be properly addressed. All marketing and reviewers act like it doesn’t exist. Luckily, it’s something that you tend to see in loading screens but it can be seen in dark scenes where the FPS is jumping all over the place. I know this can be overcome by disabling G-Sync, but I’d rather not do that.
I have used my Odyssey G7 VA for 8837 hours since I bought it in 2021, and it is still flawless with deep blacks, great response times and good colour reproduction. I work and game on my monitor, so it’s regularly on for well over 12 hrs a day, with the taskbar and static images on constantly. Until OLEDs have no discernable burn in after 10K hours, it’s pointless to recommend to those who plan on using it all the time.
A WARNING: The lad got it good only because he has got a “cheap” “dim” OLED. Newer brighter ones are much, much worse (with QD-OLED being even worse still). Also, if god forbid your room suffers from sunlight through windows, it will definitely generate nasty burn-ins even on the lads’ monitor because you must to keep the brightness at maximum. The conclusion is to NOT buy it for work. Buy it for article and games with only a little bit of “productivity”.
I think I prob have like 500-600 hours in 2 months on my alienware aw3423dwf, I try to take care off it… But with nvidia’s SDR article to HDR, I basically have HDR 1000 nits on all the time… I don’t have static elements on as much, and try to use zoom to fill as much as possible, but that’s hard to do with cough totally… Legal anime sites, though amazon prime article and netflix both have 0 issues (This is due to subtitles being cropped out, it seems the latter 2 adjust for it), so the sides tend to get less use then the center… It’s gonna be interesting to see how it holds up overtime, luckily a 3 year burn in warranty should cover me… Though I have heard pretty mixed reviews regarding it, and people getting send refurbished monitors of varying… Conditions
Give me a break. I use my monitor for gaming, then surfing internet, at night I watch movies before falling asleep. That is what I call “using” monitor, not babysitting it for 2 hours a day. I don’t count hours, don’t check pixels or worry about any of this stupid sh… cause I have non OLED and I just enjoy my screen without paranoia.
I was about to say 1,200 hours is like 1 year back in my PS4 times, when I had more than 4000 hours in Destiny alone. 😂 I have set my desktop monitor to turn off after 10 minutes and my power button on my PC is also turning off my monitor and I always push it when I’m just afk for a short time. – And I don’t even have an OLED… 😅
1200 hours is ridiculously low for a monitor. I have a dell from 2016 with 14000 hours and a lg ultragear from 2022 with 5000 hours. I got my alienware dw3423dwf 2 months ago and I try to make less hours on it but he have 400 hours already. Hey, I have a panasonic plasma gt30 with 22000 hours and 0 burn in on all slides. I have a gt50 too with only 3500 hours
I’m the type of guy who never turns off their monitor, and who often leaves their pc on when they go to sleep. I do really abuse my monitor and unless there’s actually no risk of burn in, I think I cannot jump to any OLED monitors which is a shame since I love perfect blacks. and since I do coding I’m running my monitor 16-20hr a day, mostly on a static image.
LG oled has proven to be more reliable than LCD panels. Recent stress tests show that LCD panels degrade a lot, and Mini-LED backlight suffers from degradation as well. OLED only suffers from extreme usage with exactly the same static elements left there for years.. ehich js a completely unrealistic scenario.
I’ve got this resoundingly beaten with nearly 3500 on an AW3423DW from the second wave of shipments. Tons of desktop use, no burn-in. Get QD-OLED. Samsung really seems to have largely solved burn-in issues as long as you’re not just leaving static images sitting for hours upon hours at a time. Even so, my PC has had insomnia a few times and had the desktop sitting on for 12+ hours. Still fine. FWIW though I only use HDR TrueBlack 400. I don’t use HDR 1000, I prefer the perfect blacks over the extra brightness. That brightness level might have something to do with the lack of burn-in.
The dirty screen effect made me return my asus rog strix 240hz 1440p woled monitor, it looked horrendous during the windows dark mode, every thing that was from gray to dark gray ie like looking at the empty space in a folder had those horizontal lines in the gray shades. Looked a bit like those black lines on a crt screen between the scan lines but a bit more pronounced. Impossible for me to use a screen without darkmode so only thing to do was to return it. It should be really a big spectacle/scandal that oleds have this “dirty gray” issue, yet basically no reviewer is talking about it, and if they do they make it seem like it is not a big thing… It is!
My AW3423DWF hit 1000 hours of usage a few days ago and it run the long screen refresh. I just checked on greyscreen and RGB for burnin and I can’t see any. I used the HDR 1000 mode almost exclusively, I don’t hide my taskbar, only things I do to prevent burnin is have the monitor turn off after 2 minutes of inactivity and I use 29% brightness, which is still plenty in my room. I also disable auto-HDR for some 4X games that had the bottom some UI and text glowing bright white for no reason.
I have 3.5k hours on my LG Oled 55″ it had a bit of burn in, I ran the pixel clean thing a few times and that all went away. My c2 48″ has 2.6k hours, no burn in. I abused the 55″ with no screen savers etc and I spend many hours a day on my pc as I am a 3d animator for a gaming company, so my screen sees a lot of static UI elements. The C2 48″ I am being a bit more gentle with as in I hide the task bar and I use a screen savers and I run the pixel cleaning thing every other day.
I just bought this monitor on sale for 650€. I used it in multi monitor setup as 2nd screen. Disable the taskbar in 2nd screen and use pure black background. The monitor looks like it’s off, i love it. I only use it for content consumption like netflix and youtube. Hopefully with this steps, it’ll last for years to come.
im just saying, if its going to burn in, thats no issue, here’s my reasoning 😀 only static images could burn in so that means you wont even notice it, because ure using it that way. Just like wearing clothes, if your image is that static for a whole year, that means youre using the computer like that, that means it wont be even a problem for you. Maybe mine has burn ins i dont even know about I am using my G8 on the lowest brightness because its enogh for me, on IPS you had to go way higher because of the viewing angles and the contrast. You dont have to worry about ghosting and input lag, or i choose fast response time over ghosting etc. You can say other panels have advantages but oled panel still has more.
i don’t thing im the perfect person for oled monitors the are multiple reasons for this. 1. play for old to new games and soma old game have different aspects retio that means black bar on the sides. 2. i use multiple software with staic images. 3. i use my computer alot this some off the reason i will probably not goin to buy oled eny time soon the other reason is the price and the fact that my monitor works just fine
I’ve been running a 27″ / 1440p / 144Hz IPS screen for several years now. I’m looking at getting an equivalent size OLED monitor and this years MLA panels with improved RGB layout could be the one. The pricing is a little steep however. You could buy a 48″ or larger OLED tv for the same price these monitors are going for.
the fonts don’t look better… some apps just dont use subpixel rendering, so the text uses whole pixels (only shades of grey) for aliasing instead of 3 subpixels. Such text is of 3 times lower resolution horizontaly compared to subpixel rendered text. I would just recomend sticking to bitmap fonts until RGB oled comes out. (bitmap fonts do not require antialiasing)
Have this monitor since launch and have 2491 hours of total power on time. The windows task bar is not set on auto hide (yes, I knew the risk) and I have no burn in or other problems with the monitor (except windows HDR things). Using the monitor most of the time with 0 % brightness except when I play Tarkov
Used mine for 2384 hrs now, it runs atleast 4 hours during night when perusal series or letting youtube run in the background. During weekends 16-18 hours nonstop, during work days about 8-10 hrs. I got 2 Settings, one for gaming and one more relaxing / Homeoffice friendly Brightness: 100 / 70 Contrast 70 / 50 Sharpness 60 / 50 Gamma: Mode 1 / Mode 3 Color Temp: Manual C6 (might gonna change this a bit lower as it can be ungentle on the eyes) / Warm Didn’t bother touching the Colors Deep Sleep Mode: On Automatic Standby: 4H Screen Move: Mode 2, sometimes Mode 3 when i feel like it <- Mode 3 is barely noticeable when playing, unless u pay attention to it, but if thats the case the game must be boring 😂 Screen Saver: On Energy Saving: Off (It kills the Brightness) It does Pixel/Image cleaning when not used for a while - so even if u go afk for an hour at peak Brightness u dont have to worry. EDIT: I avoid HDR Mode in games, it just doesnt feel good to me.
A few years ago, a lot of other display websites talked about burn in on oleds and all seem to agree 1000 ish hours isn’t a long time.. It’s just not long enough for modern OLEDs (from major manufacturers) to show any sign of burn in and only minor image retention. The Steam Deck OLED model does show burn in when “The Phawx” did a stress test but in the Steam Deck’s case that system does not have any pixel shifting or pixel refresh so that’s why image retention is more severe.
Hi I hope you read my message and maybe you or anyone else could answer this question btw great content so my question is I have the same exact Oled but my Oled ends differently the name is 27GR95QE-B but yours and many other reviews are called only 27GR95QE do I have a worse version or did you just skip the -B I tried finding a 27GR95Q but all search results ended to the 27GR95QE-B also your affiliated link just brings me to the 27GR95QE-B
1200h im Jahr sind nicht sonderlich viel. Ich arbeite von daheim und mein Monitor hat nach ~2 Jahren bereits 6550h aufn Buckel. Wenn ich mir rtngs Oled Test anschaue dann sollte ein Oled Monitor bereits erste Probleme mit Burnin bekommen. Ich würde zu gerne einen Oled Monitor nutzen aber alle 2-3 Jahre einen neuen Monitor kaufen ist weder vom finanziellen noch vom ökologischen Standpunkt aus akzeptabel.
I use my 65 c1 (newer WBE/EVO panel) with a PC, mostly for perusal youtube, twitch, some gaming and the occasional series or movie. Twitch streams and games often have fairly bright static elements (donation names and such). Only used hide taskbar and other tricks at the beginning out of fear, but later got lazy. I have about 3500h and absolutely 0 noticable difference from new, every test pattern is perfect (apart from the slight gray vertical banding, noticeable only on test patterns, that was there from new), zero “imprints” of taskbar or other icons. I would estimate around 50% usage is under 10 oled brightness, 40% at 35 and 10% at 100 oled brightness (dark room and usually watch in the evenings or nights).
I have two LG27 IPS displays one of them is I think around 7k hours and the other 5k hours, I’d have no clue how an IPS display degrades, does it even degrade or does it just go from working perfectly to dying suddenly? Well I’d love to see what happens after 3k or even 4k on such oled display, my older amoled phone had a lot of burn in, but it was 4 years old, was a relatively cheap phone (350 euros back in 2019) and I even had always on display activated, some pixels probably had something like 20k hours of run time on them.
For people who have this monitor, how visible is your banding in dark grey / brown scenes? I can easily notice mine in applications like Firefox and Discord, although that doesn’t bother me. I can also very rarely notice it in content like games in a particularly grey scene. Seems kinda normal and it has actually improved a bit now that Im closing in on 800hrs but I wanted to know if its normal.
Ngtl. I’ve been happy with how long my system will last. For my 1080p monitor i’ve had it since 2020. My 5900x since 2021-22. My 3700x was fine and I had it since 2020. My 2k monitor, my 6950xt and 3060 have both been alive for my average of 77-330 hours of gaming every 2 weeks. Along with my thousands of hours doing data computation my liquid cooler from coolermaster (the v2) has been cooling 145-175 even 200w peak (240mm) I am mainly worried about my AIO. But, I expect it will last another few years while I continue to mess with AI or just binging animes again
I’ve been using an LG C2 as my monitor for six months. Taskbar on auto-hide and a dark background with two icons, one of which is a screensaver shortcut that I use whenever I step away for a few minutes. I suspect I use the C2 much more than 8 hours per week and play multiple games with very bright and static UI elements. I have not had issues with any image retention so far.
i use a Oled monitor on my PC alongside 2 LCD ones and i just made the background black for the Oled Screen and moved the taskbar to one LCD monitor to have nothing on it if i don’t use it. my lock screen has animated background and if the mouse isn’t move have no static elements like a clock or login prompt.
Considering that im using my monitor on average 12h/day if not more. With 1/3 of the time spent gaming and rest doing work. My current 1440p 27″ Asus ROG SWIFT PG278Q monitor has served me for close to 10 years. I dont even want to think how many hours have I racked up. However im I do have 3-4 dead pixels and the TN pannel is rather a yesterdays tech. So now I still cannot decide if I should go for newly announced QD-OLED monitor from MSI (MAG 271QPX/MPG 271QRX) or IPS (MPG 272QPX). Kind of want OLED screen, but with the usage amount I feel like it wont last me too long.
Great article as an update to your experience, and no offense but I don’t know why do people even mention stats like this… Like, YEAH, I would fucking hope that 1500 hours into using a ~1000$ product, it hasn’t gotten any defects yet. 1500 hours of, for example, 8 hours a day usage is about HALF A YEAR. 4 hours a day (which is more reasonable) is still just around a year. That should be a given minimum expectation, not something to celebrate, no? This sounds somewhat like saying “hey, I’m 30 years old and I haven’t had a heart attack yet, I’m doing great!’. I’m thinking about getting an OLED, but It’s just kinda weird to me when people even bother mentioning these, well, rookie numbers and seem to act as if that’s somehow a positive result? Or is good OLED lifespan just supposed to be a few years and people buying them replace their monitors every 1.5-2 years and are happy if it lasts that long? Basically that means you’re rich and that’s fine if you have the money to experience top notch visual quality but is that the expectation I should have or what? EDIT: Ok, I see you said brought up “7.5 hours per week” stat and while that might be true to some people, it seems pretty low as an example and includes, yes, casual gamers (sue me for “gatekeeping”, I guess) who spend some time on their lunchbreak playing random mobile games rather than the likes who play games like Valorant on a 1000$ monitor. Even if you don’t have a lot of time during weekdays, during weekends people who bought a monitor like this PROBABLY want to spend at least 3-4 hours a day on it, right?
I have a little over 1500 hours on my AW3423DW and I haven’t seen any burn-in either. My monitor is set to HDR Peak 1000 with 100% Contrast in Creator mode. I attribute most of it to the diligent maintenance of the panel firmware i.e. Pixel Refresh every time I turn off my panel or every 4 hours depending on my settings + plus a Panel Refresh after 1500 hours (I do it once a week.)
for wallpaper, you might wanna consider wallpaper engine. just have some pretty dyanmic, and you dont have to worry. also, it has a screensaver option, so you can have something for that. i like the ascetics of a screensaver so i use it with my lcd monitors but for oleds or crts its actually useful and means you dont have to wait for it to turn on
The best of the 2023 1440p OLED monitors in my opinion after extensive research and the one I almost bought but was put off by the reports of text fringing and low brightness levels. The fact that it had two HDMI 2.1 ports was a bonus over the other OLED monitors, including the one from ASUS, but in the end I decided to just wait for the second generation panels coming in 2024 that promised to fix the text clarity issues and offer much higher brightness levels. I am awaiting the release of the 360 Hz Dell AW2725DF QD-OLED monitor here in the UK (which is non-curved, yeah!) which looks like it will be a massive improvement over my current ASUS PG279Q G-SYNC monitor, that has lasted well but now annoys me with poor black levels and that IPS glow.
Ich bin auch sehr zufrieden mit meinem LG 48gq900-b seit über einem Jahr. Mir sind am Anfang auch die chromatischen Effekte bei Text aufgefallen, aber jetzt wo du die Verbesserung über die Firmware angesprochen hast, hab ich das nochmal gegen gecheckt. Und tatsächlich. Bei mir sind diese chromatischen Effekte mittlerweile auch weg. Sind mir in der Zwischenzeit natürlich auch nicht aufgefallen. Gut zu wissen!
Wow, it’s great to see that at least one guy doesn’t have any burn-in on his OLED screen after a year of desktop use, although he admittedly did have to take somewhat careful care of it. I’ve been extremely hesitant to buy an OLED despite their amazing response times and contrast because I wouldn’t want to pay several hundred dollars for a monitor that burns in or has noticeable color fringing on text, but it seems like things are getting better.
I can’t get past the possibility of burn in on the OLED, its a deal breaker for me at the moment until OLED’s become standard in the next 2 to 3 years and they improve the technology, for the moment OLED is the breakthrough technology and imo its better to wait for it! IPS has its issues but its largely dependable and LG offers great IPS choices, im sticking wth that for now.
Just can’t jump on the oled bandwagon with the potential burn-in problem. My monitor is on probably 14 hours a day, and I’ve been using my current monitor for 7 years now (and my second screen monitor is 12 years old). Not worth buying something that potentially will have burn-in within a couple years and need to be replaced. I want my hardware to last.
So nice that you bring up this about perceived motion blur even if the OLED has near instantaneous pixel respons time! I remember comparing an OLED TV from 2017 with my Plasma TV from 2010 (both at 60 Hz) and thinknig motion blur must be so much better on the OLED with its short pixel response time. Oh, my what a surpsise when motion in games looked so much blurrier on the OLED!
Shame about the quality of text and the potential screen burn-in on the OLED. I work from home, which means I need to read a lot, and certain elements will be on screen for ~8 hours per day (which I don’t feel like you accounted for in your 1.5 year burn in prediction), but also use my monitors for playing games. I won’t be switching to OLED and instead wait for alternative technology. Thanks for the review.
It doesn’t matter that it excels in numerous regards comparative to other screens, burn in is an instant fat L. Pay hundreds (maybe thousands) of dollars for a screen that looks good at first and then progressively gets worse as the days go by, even with extensive care and attention from the consumer to try and counteract the ever-mounting problems and increasingly noticeable burn-in? No thanks. I’d rather have a monitor that you don’t have to attend to like a fragile sick child on life support.
Class vid – thanks man. I’ve just picked up the 32″ XG32VC. Noticeably slow compared to the XG27WQ I had before it and ofc not in the same league of pixel performance of the PG259QNR before that. However, the immersion is excellent and I’ll be sure to wait for the rumoured 32″ 240hz 4K OLED panels in the not to distant future!
The OLED model is very nice, if exclusively used for gaming. The problem with the text clarity (not a problem of OLED but the specific panel that uses an extra “W” LED) and the danger of burn in (e.g. regarding the task bar), make it unsuitable for me, who wants to use a monitor for things other than gaming. BTW, the out of the box calibration of the OLED model is not nearly as good as that of the IPS model. Regarding Asus’ design, what were they thinking when they gave the monitor a lit up chin? That is so distracting and must be super annoying when playing in low light conditions. I hope that all the lighting gimmicks the monitor offers can be turned off.
I just upgraded from a 160hz IPS to a 240hz OLED. There really is some motion blur but tracking moving objects at medium speed is much cleaner and therefore easier on the eyes. As for Refreshrate: i dont feel much of a difference. – i actually wanted to get rid of motion blur with the OLED purchase but i guess therr is no way to get around that. You said more Hertz, but I doubt i could generate more than 240 frames in Call Of Duty, even with a 4090, cause that 3D-Engine is miles behind modern competitive games which easily go to 500fps😊
I saw this review and thought wow .. a lot of guys could give a more accurate review. I’m not into having a website.. but lets not mislead people- even unintentionally… This is where the reviewer uses some facts to produce an opinion he believes is fact for you and me the viewers. He says the OLED can switch pixels in 0.1 milliseconds seconds versus the IPS which can switch in 1.5 milliseconds.. This mind you is millionths of a seconds which can’t be perceived easily if at all but this isn’t the issue. While the reviewer gives specs of individual pixels of these two technologies – Pixels only change with the clock cycle which is in given to us as a spec in Hz … while you also have other bottlenecks not mentioned .. The issue is the chip and controller determining refresh rates. The IPS has a refresh rate of 360 Hz even more amazing .. The 240Hz OLED screen refreshes every 4.1 milliseconds.. The IPS screen refreshes at 360Hz which is every 2.7 milliseconds. Anyone here following this ? The faster OLED pixels ( can switch at 0.1 milliseconds ) are literally refreshing at 240 Hz which means they can’t go any faster then 4.1 milliseconds. That’s the faster that controller can refresh the screen. While the IPS pixels at 1.5 milliseconds can actually refresh faster because it’s not about the pixels- it’s about the refresh rate. The IPS refreshes every 2.7 milliseconds. In short the IPS screeen refreshes pixels every 2.7 milliseconds … and the OLED refreshes every 4.1 milliseconds because the bottleneck isn’t the screen itself.
I hate to break it to ya but for the price these OLED monitors are asking any amount of burn-in, no matter how small or insignificant, is utterly unacceptable. When I get an expensive OLED monitor I expect to set it up once and use it nonstop without having to do any chore such as pixel cleaning or whatever the fck these corpos have us do. Until they’ve solved the issue I think I’ll stick to the tried and true IPS panels.
LG 27GR95QE PRO TIP: This may work for all monitors. Even if the HDR settings grays out the SDR settings. This tip can help you recalibrate your monitors for HDR even better. All your calibratied SDR settings carry over when HDR is on or active. If your using an HDMI cable to connect to your devices and receiving black crush/ too dark when using HDR. Turn off HDR> in SDR picture settings turn your HDMI level to high (not low) turn back on HDR and restart your game app. Everything should be fix. This isn’t an option when using DP. If you don’t believe all your SDR settings carry over to HDR. Turn your SDR settings completely RED than which over to HDR and see that the red is still active.
The only dealbreaker of an OLED is its durability, they are extremely delicate and degenerate too quickly for how much they cost. especially for computer use, its ideal use is to watch movies sporadically, like a projector. The industry is forcing the use of this type of technology because they know that it is disposable and it is easier to continue consuming every 3 to 5 years than an infinite ips
One thing that you didn’t mention is HDR gaming which while only some games have great native implementation, you can make some games look amazing with Windows auto HDR. Overwatch here pops out even more when I enable HDR on my LG C3 which complements the clean cartoony artstyle. Just make sure to use HGIG if possible to retain the most accurate image.
Hey Optimum great unbiased review man! I had seen the article also when it came out and I happened to land on it again today and considering the fact that it has been 7 months until the article release, it felt like a decent point at which I could come and ask if you have any shenanigans or Burn ins to report. Does the monitor still remain flawless or you happen to have witnessed any issues with it (Always speaking about the OLED one
The OLED here sounds insane, the only problem is it’s not 4k. I had such a hard time buying a 4k monitor because here in Australia, there’s no high-end options, all the expensive monitors have significant drawbacks. The 4k X28 monitor I got is an IPS and it’s only HDR400, you can get some OLED 4k monitors here but for some reason their mostly big 42 inch ones and at weird refresh rates like 138hz. I just want a 27 inch 4k OLED that’s at least 144hz with Adaptive Sync and good HDR, but for some reason there’s nothing available.
Very good alternatives for less money: ~600USD: Alienware AW2723DF | 27″ / 1440p IPS / 280Hz / Free-Sync + G-SYNC / excellent input-lag, very good response time at any framerate, no overshooting even at Extreme overdrive ~850USD: LG 27GR95QE-B | 27″ / 1440p OLED / 240Hz / Free-Sync / excellent contrast ratio, very good input-lag, excellent response time at any framerate (only 3.1ms as a total value)
Yeah, oled is the future… Until you notice the panel is totally burned in within a year and you’ll have to buy a new oled another year down the line. Great future… I’ll stick to tech that lasts a bit longer thank you. We have mini and micro led screens already which can do anything oled can but better and longer, with prices coming down faster then oled. But you rich Youtubers surely love it replacing stuff a lot. I wonder how paid that opinion is as supposed to simply being out of touch.
dude your content is second to none, I dont know if you have a team working with you or you do it all yourself but either way its incredible.. I find myself wanting to emulate your entire setup and peripherals…. you just need a set of Vanatoo T0 powered desktop speakers.. trust me they are worth 1000 dollars and they are significatly cheaper then that.
@9:30 biggest reason I’ll stick with my IPS. If you have 20/20 or better near vision you’ll definitely notice the weird color fringing on text and get annoying. Also, annoying issues with ABL and using it as desktop monitor to display white backgrounds for long periods of time like spreadsheets other applications that don’t support dark mode or themes.
That Oled monitor looks like an awesome treat. I somewhat recently went from an old Acer 144hz VA-Panel Monitor to an AOC IPS Panel 165hz GSync. 3 weeks in and i was still talking about how awesome that IPS Panel looks and how nice that monitor is lol ( both 1080p ). Can only imagine the beauty of OLED. One Day..one day. 😀
I can’t wait until QLED or whatever comes after OLED pops off so I can grab an OLED display. I have decent hardware, more than enough to run a 120+ hz OLED, but I got it all for such a deal that This single monitor would run me more than my entire build did, which consists of an i5-12600k, an RTX 3080,an ASUS Z690 PRIME, 32GB DDR4 3800 MHz, 750 watt fully modular thermaltake 80+ Gold PSU, a really nice thermal take case with 3TB in NVME storage and 3TB in SSD storage booted from a gen 4 NVMe and a some nice ARGB. The 3080 is modded to use an aio instead of a cooling shroud with fans too.
GREAT vid! one thing iId love to see in future comparisons is an on-screen tag stating which monitor we are looking at, at all times, as you some times refer to the/a monitor(s) as the “ASUS” or the “LG” and in some shots there are two ASUS monitors? you then sometimes refer to them by their model numbers (I have no idea which is which by this reference as i don’t know the model numbers) then sometimes you refer to them as the “OLED” or the “IPS” so we now have 6 difference references for only two monitors…lol….all this confusion can be eliminated by showing ‘OLED’ onscreen when the OLED is onscreen, and same for IPS. Hope this helps. Appreciate it.
I bought the 1440p LG monitor after your last article (i was playing with the thought before that) and I’m in love with that thing. The monitor is just great (I actually like that it is not glossy, i don’t want to see my reflection while gaming). I was just stunned after switching it on the first time.
Great review! I’ve been using MSI MPG 271QRX for 3 weeks now, and while it has some solid features, I’ve been really disappointed with a few things. One major issue is the black screen delay when alt-tabbing during fullscreen games, which lasts for 2-3 seconds. Disabling DSC solves it but drops the refresh rate to 240hz, which defeats the purpose of having a higher refresh rate monitor in the first place. Coming from an Asus IPS 360hz panel, I have to say I’m not impressed with the motion clarity on this OLED, especially for fast-paced FPS games like CS and Deadlock. It just doesn’t keep up, and I’m switching back to an IPS/TN panel. Sad to say, I feel like OLED might not be the best route for competitive gaming right now.
Hi, I am interested in the comparitive power consumption usage of these two monitors. I hope you can consider adding this info in future articles. LG monitors seem to offer very decent built in speakers for their monitors, such as 2 x 7w or 2 x 5w speakers, and they sound pretty clear. Monitor speakers of other brands typically seem to around 2 x 2w, which probably makes them sound tinny. I mainly use headphones, but it’s nice to use the monitor’s speakers if they offer decent performance, and it’s less stuff to plug in.
I’ve been using a 48 inch screen for the past 7 years and expect a monitor to last 5-10 years. I just don’t believe oled can last even 2 years without burning in the static taskbar that would be visible about 99% of the time. I’ll probably buy a new one soon since there are now good VA/IPS tvs that support 120Hz and VRR with Nvidia. So unfortunately I will have to skip the deep blacks/no bloom beauty of oleds.
Im a StarCitizen player and i think depending on the Game you play an OLED Panel can be a gamechanger. I mean if you are in Space, then perfect Blacks will most likely hit different. Ive seen a good OLED 3440×1440 Monitor für just 720€ lately… When they are even cheaper in 2 or 3 years i will definitely buy one of these.
Hey, I doubt il get a response but il try! I have an older Rog Swift, a PG279Q, which has G-sync. I absolutely love G-sync, I can notice when its on or off very easily and I would find it hard going back to a non-gsync monitor. The 360 monitor is advertised as a Gsync monitor, where as the OLED 240 isnt. It says that its gsync compatible. What does that mean? Whats the difference? And would I not feel like I was playing on a gsync monitor if I choose the 240hz one? Should mention that I dont usually play competitve games so I very rarely will reach even 240hz, think more BG3, Elden Ring, Diablo 4, those types of games. Thanks.