This chapter explores the impact of identity on communication and self-perception, emphasizing the importance of understanding one’s own interpersonal communication preferences to better understand oneself, their identity, and motivations. Communication skills are crucial for personal development, as they enable interaction with colleagues and friends. The chapter identifies eight principles that link communication and identity, emphasizing the role of identity in personal self-discovery.
The authors identify three major topics where communication plays a central role in identity management for emerging adults: relationships with peers, relationships with parents, and the use of identities through communication. Identity is expressed or enacted through communication, and the relationship between communication and identity is explored.
The development of personal identities is influenced by various factors, including daily comments, environment, and communication. The environment plays a significant role in determining an individual’s personality, and poor communication can lead to a poor perception of oneself. Poor communication can affect an individual’s emotional state, dislikes, values, and body image.
Helping people at all levels to communicate empowers them to recognize important issues and find common grounds for action, building a sense of identity. Other forces, such as age, physical ability/disability, sexual orientation, and motivation, also shape an individual’s identity and communication.
In summary, communication shapes social identity by facilitating community building, influencing cultural identity formation, and playing a role in effective communication. Each person’s individual identity plays a significant role in shaping their communication skills and understanding how to effectively communicate and convey meaning to others.
📹 Identity and Culture in Communication | Human Communication | Study Hall
We often tend to ignore what we consider normal, and pay attention when something unusual happens. Two factors of …
How does communication affect the development of our personal identities?
Communication plays a significant role in shaping our personal identity. Daily comments, whether positive or negative, shape our perception of ourselves. Intrapersonal communication also plays a role in shaping our self-image. Depending on how we speak to ourselves, we can establish a positive or negative self-image.
Throughout my semester in communications, I have learned about myself, relationships, and how to deal with others. One lesson that stood out was in chapter 3 about interpersonal communication and the self. In this lesson, we discussed the social penetration theory, which focuses on the breadth and depth of personal information we share.
The four people we chose were a girl, my sister, my dad, and my boyfriend. After completing the circles, we found that the girl we worked with had the least information, and my sister had the most. This realization led us to understand that our relationship with my father was more surface-level than we initially thought.
Another strength of my communication is my non-verbal skills, such as tones, gestures, and eye contact. My colleagues have praised my expressiveness and vocal inflections, which have allowed me to communicate across cultural and language barriers when necessary. Overall, communication plays a crucial role in shaping our personal identity and influencing our interactions with others.
How does communication tie into identity management?
Identity management can be defined as the communication strategies employed to present oneself and influence others’ perceptions of them. Each individual possesses a multitude of selves, with the perceived self being the person they believe themselves to be when engaging in introspective reflection.
How does communication help in personal life?
Effective communication facilitates connections, the sharing of ideas, and the development of knowledge, thereby reducing time wastage, building relationships, fostering teamwork, and enhancing trust, and ultimately enabling more optimal life choices.
How important is communication to your personal?
Effective communication facilitates connections, the exchange of ideas, and the development of knowledge, thereby reducing time wastage, building relationships, fostering teamwork, and enhancing trust, and ultimately enabling more optimal life choices.
What is the role of communication in our life?
Effective communication plays an instrumental role in the formation and maintenance of relationships, the development of trust, and the advancement of knowledge, thereby facilitating more optimal life decisions. It facilitates comprehension of individuals, transcends diversity, and elucidates circumstances, both in domestic and professional contexts.
How does communication affect identity?
Communication plays a significant role in shaping our personal identity. Daily comments, whether positive or negative, shape our perception of ourselves. Intrapersonal communication also plays a role in shaping our self-image. Depending on how we speak to ourselves, we can establish a positive or negative self-image.
Throughout my semester in communications, I have learned about myself, relationships, and how to deal with others. One lesson that stood out was in chapter 3 about interpersonal communication and the self. In this lesson, we discussed the social penetration theory, which focuses on the breadth and depth of personal information we share.
The four people we chose were a girl, my sister, my dad, and my boyfriend. After completing the circles, we found that the girl we worked with had the least information, and my sister had the most. This realization led us to understand that our relationship with my father was more surface-level than we initially thought.
Another strength of my communication is my non-verbal skills, such as tones, gestures, and eye contact. My colleagues have praised my expressiveness and vocal inflections, which have allowed me to communicate across cultural and language barriers when necessary. Overall, communication plays a crucial role in shaping our personal identity and influencing our interactions with others.
Why is communication important to your personality?
Communication is a fundamental aspect of human interaction, enabling individuals to express themselves effectively and exchange personality traits and attributes. This process not only shapes their emotional development but also influences their attitudes and aptitudes, which may undergo changes over time.
What is the role of personal identity?
Identity is crucial for maintaining a strong sense of self and ties us together, even in challenging situations. Each individual is unique in their emotional expression, personal style, character, passions, strengths, and vulnerabilities. It means what we perceive as true about ourselves and what others perceive as true about us. Without a solid sense of self, we may feel invisible or nonexistent. Our identity is our brand, like a Nike swoosh, and without it, we may not be able to express ourselves effectively or be recognized by others.
What is the role of communication in human development?
Communication activities can foster positive dialogue among people from various social groups within a community, enabling them to share information and ideas. This dialogue can be enriched by understanding development issues, discovering others’ perspectives, and observing successful initiatives. Field staff with strong interpersonal communication skills can initiate and guide dialogue, using discussion tools like flipcharts, audio-cassettes, slides, and videos.
Rural radio can also serve as a popular forum for discussing technical and cultural topics. These activities can lead to a diagnosis of problems and a search for solutions. Face-to-face work is necessary to bridge understanding within the community, but communication skills and media can facilitate visualization and facilitate quick communication.
What communication processes are involved in identity development?
Identity development in communication is influenced by symbolic interactionism, which suggests that individuals’ meanings for objects, actions, and people around them are shaped by social interactions with others. This theory suggests that what we define as beautiful, ethical, or edible is based on what we have heard and experienced during these interactions. Three communication processes involved in identity development are reflected appraisals, social comparison, and self-fulfilling prophecies.
Reflected appraisals, also known as the looking-glass self, suggests that people’s self-images are primarily shaped by the ways others view them and the messages they have received about who they are. This concept is often referred to as the looking-glass self, as it highlights the idea that self-images are shaped by the images others reflect back to us.
What is personal identity in communication?
The personal layer of identity can be defined as the perceptions that an individual holds about themselves, which they then communicate to others. This encompasses both the self-concept and self-knowledge that an individual possesses, which can be considered a crucial aspect of their self-image.
📹 Who am I? A philosophical inquiry – Amy Adkins
Throughout the history of mankind, the subject of identity has sent poets to the blank page, philosophers to the agora and seekers …
Asking “who am i” makes me feel like I physically cannot ever answer this. It feels like my brain isn’t equipped to process any further. I look into the mirror and I dissociate. I have a lot of days I dissociate. I truly think a huge part of why is because I don’t do enough in my life to feel fulfilled. I was so lively as a kid and I feel like I let go of that as I started overthinking and getting caught up in the things that don’t matter, having now to chase that my “self” again. It’s a feeling I can’t explain, but i know I have to start seeking more discomfort and doing more in my life to feel closer to my self.
When I was a kid, I decided that I was a doughnut hole…. meaning that I am nothing, but who and what I am is defined by things that are not me, just as a hole is nothing, but defined by the doughnut which is not the hole. Yeah, I was a weird kid. These days, I think of myself more as a wave pattern.
Ok. When each one of your cells die, a part of you dies with it. When you’re completely replaced, it’s a new person who thinks it’s you in every way. It has all your memories, all your habits, all your thoughts. Like a clone. But the old you is dead. Gone. Replaced. So live, live now, in the moment before you are gone too.
Buddhism provides answer for this kind of question really well. You cannot define yourself because there is no such thing as ‘I’. Your body is not the true nature of you. Your mind cannot be the trueself since it changes all the time. Your name,job,residence, and so on can never define you by itself. However, all the things mentioned above, when all the things that compose you gather it is you. So, your true identity is the one acknowledging that there is not a single thing that can define you by itself but, at the same time there is not a single thing that is not part of you. So instead of debating about whether the ship mentioned in the article is a or b, just embrace the fact that the ship is a and b at the same time while both cannot define the ship alone. Dont try to define things with one feature or point of view.
I have come to think of “who am I?” from a different perspective. For me it is an equation with constant and variable factors. The key isn’t in finding the solution to the equation, it is in finding the factors that are constant. The solution to the equation will always vary, as time in itself can never be constant, but you will be in peace with yourself as long as you realize/find/understand the factors that are constant for you. The most content of people that I’ve met have had atleast 2 of these factors in common as a constant i.e. Faith (not necessarily god), companionship (friend, family, gf) and passion for what they do.
I made a promise with someone before days later, he was disappointed with me I told him: It wasn’t “me” that made that promise with “you” but the “me” that “I”used to be that made that promise with “you” and it wasn’t “you” that made that promise with “me” but the “you” you used to be that “I” made that promise with. Then I realize I was talking to myself and the promise was to promise to keep promises. I guess the very first person I disappoint is myself, huh?
I think identity based on how you understand yourself and how others understand you, as well as how you feel the connection to oneself and how others feel the connection to you. So even if sb with dementia forgets most things and acts differently, as long as people connect to them as if they were. They are still the same person.
I always considered the software more important than the hardware after a point, the hardware only matters to me insofar as it can run the software well. I am the ship of Theseus, the meat parts of my mind and body have all been replaced many times, every cell in my body is a copy of a copy of a copy made with new materials. But I’m not just a meat computer, I’m a unique and constantly changing configuration of neurological software with my own highly personalized settings and memory cache. If I could make a copy there would be two of me, the copy would have no less claim to being me than the original. We’d likely evolve into two very different people given enough time but we would both have an equal claim to the same root identity. In my experience people who insist otherwise are just being arbitrary. That’s how I see it anyway.
we really shouldn’t worry about who we are because that doesn’t matter. we should just do what makes us happy and what gives us peace. we shouldn’t dwell on the past because after all we can’t go back to yesterday because we were different. as long as we all try to be 1% better every day (aka try are best/be kind to others)then that’s all that matters
you are what you choose to be. i am not talking in term wealth or status but i am talking in terms of person or human being. every decision you ever take small or big define and shape who you really are. it is human agency which is root of human identity because it is our decisions which separate us as individual
I know who i am, because i had first experianced ‘the ultimate loneliness’ in this whole universe on the age of 16 . After many times i have come to this conclusion that ‘ I am everything i mean every each particle that is in existence from the begining of my self ‘. This is not as easy as everyone can understand what i actually want to say . Because this answer is only and only related to me, myself, my ultimate consciousness,my ultimate loneliness, ultimate reality of myself etc. Thank you for reading it 🙂
If an “I” exists, it can never know itself to exist. Let me explain what I mean: All that you can observe cannot be you because that observation requires an observer. The “me” that you are defining with your likes and dislikes, your thoughts, feelings or your body is a result of your cultural indoctrination and influence of people around you, and it can’t really be you because who is the “I” that’s defining the “me”? In the words of Alan Watts, you cannot bite your own teeth, the knife can’t cut itself and light can’t shine on itself. I would argue that it’s not supposed to, and the same goes with us. So the moment you say “I am..” you are referring to someone that isn’t really there(the ego)…. For a comparison, we don’t see water as something that is made up of molecules, we clearly understand that the molecules are the water. There isn’t water that has 2 molecules of H and one O, they’re not separate, they’re one and the same. And that are the reasons why I can’t understand why someone would believe in a ridiculous thing like a soul.. The very concept of a soul is too simple an answer don’t you think? I seriously challenge someone to debunk this. lol please.
Answering the question at hand though “who am I?”, you’d have to take both of the factors below into account, not just one. You are what you’ve been and all you could be. You are the endless possibilities and life choices you can make. You are your life and all it can be. Not all it will or has been, but all it has the chance to be. In endless timelines, possibilities and 50/50 chances, you’re not one side of the coin and you’re most certainly not the path you have chosen or will choose. Instead, you are everything you COULD choose. Everything you can experience. Everything you are now and can choose to be or not to be. You’re everything that could happen to you. You, I, we, are nothing more and nothing less than a million billion possibilities. As diverse as the theory of multiple timelines itself (should it be true) you are all the versions of yourself. They’re all inside you like tools in a tool box, it’s just a matter of what you’ve needed yourself to be in the circumstances given, and most days, you don’t even know all the tools you have, simply because you’ve never given yourself the chance to use them. Its as beautifully simple and yet complex as… You are all you could ever be, whether you like it or not, in the end it’s not even such an important question. Certainly thrilling and adventurous, but of not much importance. Nonetheless, take the freedom to explore it’s ideas like a kid in the playground, that is afterall, all life is. As to my opinion on the ship problem, I think the ship in somebody’s ‘back yard’ is the real ship.
All philosophical / metaphysical (or otherwise vaguely structured) questions pertaining to “I” can be answered in pure scientific & mathematical terms if and only if the following question can be answered: “Where am I” (in other words, where is “I” precisely located) For example, if Theseus’ ship were reductively defined as a single point – say, its center of gravity, then the philosophical question of the two ships can be answered – the refurbished ship, despite no longer having any original parts, still retains the center of gravity of the original ship. Each time an orignal part was replaced, the new part integrates with the center of gravity of the original ship. And conversely, the 2nd ship assembled using the disintegrated original parts comes together around a new center of gravity, hence it is not the same as the original ship, even though the parts are the same. Extending to us conscious beings – we need to (or science needs to) first identify where the “I” actually resides. By analogy, each and every cell of our body (including possibly all our brain cells) might have been newly formed and totally different from our childhood body, yet the “center of gravity” or the locus of “I” of our being has remained unchanged since the moment of conception in our mothers’ womb. “I” am not my body… “I” am not my brain… “I” am the convergence point of all my conscious/subconscious experiences.
This is so easy. Okay lets assume the original ship had 100 parts. Whenever 1 part is damaged and changed with a new part, the refurbished ship is 99% same of the original ship, up until the last original part (at which the ship is 1% of the ORIGINAL ship). When the last original part is changed, it is 0% the original ship. On the other hand, the guy who collects the original parts, has 1% of the original ship in the beginning and eventually has 100% parts of the original ship. Though he has 100% of the parts, it may not be 100% the same because of various factors (primarily of how he built it compared to the original builder) which is a pretty ambiguous reality because the constitutional assumptions for this paradox are a bit vague. Verdict: The two questions answered here is; 1) “Who am I at this very moment” (with the assumption of change is permitted) – for which the answer is the REFURBISHED ship. 2) “Who am I at this very moment” (without the assumption of change) – for which the answer is the ORIGINAL ship. Conclusion: Shitty paradox with a shittier example.
Personally I think identity lies on the status of the beholder, not the beholder itself. So for example in the ship of thesus story, the ship would be the beholder, and what changes are the parts being seperate physical parts but it is still the same ship with a slightly different identity. The old ship pieces put back together (in a random guy’s backyard) would be a completely different beholder with an identity of what the ship once was made with.
To see yourself as a vessel that simply holds who you are is my correct way of looking at this. The ship of Theseus should not be seen as a thing but rather an idea, the ship holds a memory, a memory of the great adventure of a great person. If the ship that they have now presents that idea then I believe that that should be the original. Anyone can say they have the real deal but really, that is the ship that everyone agrees is the real thing. The same as you, what ideas or stories you bring just by being you is you. What if when you die, the dead corpse in the ground isn’t you it’s the ending of you, just as the sunset isn’t the day itself. The memories that are associated with you is what make up you. What is truly more you, a meat sack controlled by a meat blob, or an idea that brings memories of your past, present, and perhaps future?
Who am I ? The gross body which is composed of the seven humours (dhatus), I am not; the five cognitive sense organs, viz. the senses of hearing, touch, sight, taste, and smell, which apprehend their respective objects, viz. sound, touch, colour, taste, and odour, I am not; the five cognitive senseorgans, viz. the organs of speech, locomotion, grasping, excretion, and procreation, which have as their respective functions speaking, moving, grasping, excreting, and enjoying, I am not; the five vital airs, prana, etc., which perform respectively the five functions of in-breathing, etc., I am not; even the mind which thinks, I am not; the nescience too, which is endowed only with the residual impressions of objects, and in which there are no objects and no functioning’s, I am not. If I am none of these, then who am I? After negating all of the above-mentioned as ‘not this’, ‘not this’, that Awareness which alone remains – that I am. Ramana Maharshi
This raises the real issue of cybernetics. If I lose an arm and get a bionic arm, is the bionic arm part of me? Or a tool i use? If I then lose both legs and the other arm, then the answer would be the same as the last one. If I now lose a heart, a kidney and replace with bionics… same answer still? Now I replace my whole body except my brain. Still same answer? Now I replace my brain… crossed the line yet? When is a human not a human?
The ship repair example reminds me of an episode of Futurama, where Hermes experienced a similar conflict of identity as he replaced more and more of himself with robotic parts. Until his brain was replaced, he essentially believed he was still himself; however his friends and family disagreed. So perhaps until the LAST piece of the original ship was replaced, it retained its identity as the original ship?
Since I was around 6 I have been pondering about my existence, not so much after I grew up though, there will often be times where I come into deep thoughts about myself, thinking about why am I able to control myself, my body and my mind, and the deeper I go into it the more it frightens me, until a point where I feel I am in an absolute void. The feeling of having complete power over something becomes unusual. I tried asking if my peers have this kind of feeling but no one does. Its still bizarre and terrifying to me, but I don’t hate it as all the vivid thoughts and feelings becomes part of who I am.
“I” am the information contained in my neural network — the way the neurons are connected to each other. This may be extended to the entire body to some extent. But ultimately it’s the information that matters, and not the material storing that information. Just like a digital photo is defined/identified by the information (sequence of 0’s and 1’s) and not the hard disk on which it is stored or the network cable that it’s transmitted through.
The historian Plutarch explain the discovery of the self by using the ship of Thesues. like the ship of Thesues plutarch telling that you are constantly changing part your physical body, mind, emotions, circumstances and even your quirks always changing but still in amazing and logical way you stay the same. For example in puberty teenagers change physical body and their mind and emotions gets matured.
Who am I? I am a proof of evolution, I am a part of a star, I am the laws of physics in action, I am nothing compared to the universe, I am one of more than 100 billion people that ever lived on this planet, I am a factory, converting things all the time, I am stuck on a part of the conveyor belt of time…
Plutarch wants to tells us that what may change in our body will never replace the way we are, our soul, our personality and our existence in this world . Example is even someone got cut off his/her leg and change with artificial, his/her self remain the same just a part of his/her body has change. Physically changed but memories are intact. Ortega, Lorence Jay BSEMT 2-E
2:17 My theory is that we aren’t the parts that make up who we are, but the specific and unique way they come together. When a piece of ourself is replaced, the old part stops being a part of us, because it doesn’t contribute to our identity anymore, and it’s the reverse for the new part. In this sense, the atoms and particles that build us come and go, so they aren’t what our identity is for the eternity of time. However, it’s how the parts that come and go combine together and form us that makes us who we are. Basically, we are the blueprint of ourself, not the materials for building it. Would a bunch of metal beams and screws on the ground be the same as the building that it creates?
I feel pretty stable in my sense of self being all parts of me. Mind, body, spirit. I like to hang out with myself and get to know me. It’s helped me grasp the concept of me. It’s all just a part of me. My spiritual inclinations, all of my many different thoughts and ideas, each part of my body-it’s the complete operation of me. Nothing more and nothing less.
This is why belief in metaphysical concepts like the soul or ‘I consciousness ‘ is crucial to solving these paradoxes. Let’s say, a 50-year-old man is both physically and biologically distinct from his 15-year-old teen self. Yet there is still a voice that exists questioning his identity all through the years. That’s the soul. It’s constant.
We are always changing as people throughout our time on earth and each experience alters us in some way. It is impossible to stay the same as you live your life, mentally and physically. The only way to define who you are is by your actions as you wander through these uncharted waters, just like in the article. How you live your life and how you interact with the other wanderers distinguishes each and every person that has ever lived on this planet. How you act creates this mindset to other people of how you are “supposed’ to be like, but this is not true to you. You know and see how you change throughout time and create new identities or new “you’s”. This changing is good and shows that you are growing just like nature intended it to be. Who am I? I’m me, who are you?
Nice Eurocentric (Or Greco-centric) viewpoint that the up-loader shares, but there are a lot more philosophers out there that have answered this question, especially those in ancient India. This topic of ‘Who am I’ is immensely discussed in the Vedas and Upanishads of ancient India and revealed by the ancient Sages. It is one of the core foundations of the Vedic religion. Well, what was their answer? You are the Self, pure consciousness, immutable and unchangeable, and aware of your existence. The mind and intellect, along with the five senses and their organs, are tools which allow the Self (or the Soul) to experience the phenomenal world. Through the ego, the Self identifies with the intellect, mind, and senses and considers them its own, giving rise to notions such as “mine” and “not mine”. For example, “my mind”, “my body”, “my intellect”. If all these are mine, then who am I? You are the Self, changeless and eternal, amidst the changing mind, intellect, and ego.
Here’s my philosophy: You are your own memories. Think about it if you loose your memory, you’ll no longer be able to identify yourself! And if somehow we could put someone’s memories in some other person’s mind, the latter would think his the first person although he looks nothing like him. Thus you’re defined by your memories.
This misses a huge part; that you are your mind, and your mind is made up of memories. Lets say your body cells have all died and have been replaced, and you have absolutely no memory of when you were two years old. This could mean you are a totally different person than when you were two, right? No, because when you were 3, you did have memories of when you were two, and those memories, or things that happened to you when you were two, shaped who you WERE at the age of three, and who you were at three contributed to who you were at 5… etc, and I bet you still have at least some memories of when you were 5, so you are the same ship you were at the age of 2, just an advanced form, or possibly going beyond the point of repair.
You are not this body, The body is just an instrument through you can sense the world, You are the one who is experiencing the senses through the instrument(body), Everything in this world dies except one thing that is you( the one who experience not the body) If your body dies, you will still be conscious, If you really want to understand who you are – go to “Sandeep maheshwarispirituality” website on YouTube, you will get your answers if you want to understand yourself deeply. His astavakra session are in English .
Simple. If all the parts are replaced, it’s identical but not the same ship. Because the original is gone. If at least one part still stems from the original, it’s the same ship with a ton of repairs. And regarding the “who are you?” All of the above, basically. You are your past, present and future self. Your mind, body, feelings etc. But you are also more than the sum of your parts because you change, grow and think critically which these parts couldn’t do individually.
I think,that It is not the physical ship that’s important It’s the SYMBOL that the ship represents,of bravery,of the voyage and king Atheneus,which is important and the answer to the question, so that the future generations get inspired. Similarly, It’s not only our physical body but the whole of us (like our behaviour,our habits,our liking and dislikes etc.) that is the answer to who am I.
I understand this, but I just don’t think “the ship of Theseus” would help people in their thoughts of who they are and if a clone of them is them (as an example). I think we all could come to an agreement that one boat would be a copy/replica in the case of Theseus and one persons body would be a copy/replica in the case of the clone. But to compare the consciousness to a physical thing is really iffy. But this is only MY take on this paradox which I solely rely on if the person identifies them self from their consciousness ie: their memories and demeanor; and not their…. everything such as their heart, chest, lungs, toes and so on. (I’m pretty sure I made a mess ton grammatical errors in this. Please feel free to correct me)
Plutarch explains the discovery of the self by connecting it to the story of “The Ship of Theseus”, Ourselves are constantly changed in every parts of our body, our physical, emotion, and even our mentality. However, our own understanding of ourselves are always remains the same. Example of where the situation relates to this are, Like a Mango tree, even if you cut one of the stem or the branch of it, it will recover after several days and it will look the same. Even if you cut one of its branch it will always be the same and it will always be a Mango tree Sanchez, Crister M. BSEMT-2E
The moment a piece is changed from the ship, it no longer is Theseus’ ship. It ‘was’, once. Similarly, we are too changing constantly. We may be similar from our past selves, but we are not the same. Same applies to our fellow beings, we all changed, evolved, from one entity. We maybe similar, more similar to close relatives, but never the same. Seeing my past self as another identity, I could forgive myself for his doings. 🙂
What’s more me, the metaphysical concept of me (my memories, my emotions, my experiences, my thoughts) or the physical reality of me (my body, how I feel, taste, smell ect.) The comments seem to be leaning towards the metaphysical, but why? Even if we believe in the soul, it’s not like a living person is just a ghost stuck in a meat jail driving it around. We are our bodies, it hurts we hurt. It is who we are in the world, not just a means of transferring sensory information to the true me in my mind. We aren’t software or hardware we just are a computer. One without the other isn’t actually who I am now. My mind in someone else’s body would be a substantially different thing to what I am.
when is “am” which aspect of me is “I” you are not 2 person and you are not a person you are an experience thuyền bị hư và những phần hư đó của nó dc sao chép như nguyên bản và lắp lại vào nó như ban đầu sau 1000 năm toàn bộ các bộ phận của con thuyền hầu như đều đã được thay thế, và giống hệt như ban đầu vậy câu hỏi là con thuyền lúc đầu và con thuyền lúc sau có phải là một không nếu có thì lại sai vì những bộ phận nó đều đã được thay thế bởi những món khác hết rồi nếu không thì lại sai tiếp vì chiếc thuyền lúc sau y hệt như chiếc thuyền lúc đầu, các chi tiết đều dc sao chép như thật
This is a wise, clever, people-friendly explanation of the philosophy of Identity. What we need is a useful procedure for taking stock of one’s identity; a way for relating that to self-esteem; a metric for self-assessing one’s self esteem; and a procedure for strategically planning how to build on identity strengths, heal identity wounds and fill the lacunae; then a method to transform identity and self esteem needs into new strengths. That whole process needs to be behaviorally specific and replicable… I believe that’s what we need next. -Doug Pratt, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
How high we soar depends on how deep we go to face our everyday fear and how we forgive and forgo. It does not mean the courage to show masculinity or trying to outbeat the norms in life or climbing higher than others. If none affects how we love and show kindness, be it even the ones who hurt us deep to the very core, knowing that they are the ones who had suffered something they cannot change, showing them compassion without bending to fear or change one’s nature, the essence of life that transcends all forms may be close at sight for you and I.
Ok I am going to try to answer it. Let say that you have a thought, how is this thought quantify? All sources of all can only be define by it self, meaning let say we are in a simulation all sources would be what you feel and think and you would be the definition of what you feel. Now that is existence now we need to define what subdivision of existence it is, and this is absolutely arbitrary, but the most common system of definition is a definition of a tool.
You are none of them. Because whatever you consider yourself as you which are always in time and space, and which is changeable.. Your are not something which is always changing. You are the ultimate truth which is the pure consciousness. Or BRAHMAN. ❤ which never change and the ultimate ground and reality of everything where everything is being playing on its own nature. 🕉 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
You’re not your thoughts, you’re not your brain You’re just the character you’ve made Up in your head, down in your heart What seem like separate body parts Come together to believe they’re you And not just chemistry It’s not the way that you were raised Or what the advertisements say Not what you pay for, what you pray for What you want, or what you say – Lyrics from Marsha Thankk You for the Dialectics, but I Need You to Leave (by Will Wood)
Well, I am not my memories or thoughts. Even ‘I am’ is aslo a thought. What is a thought? Thought is language. Can a baby think? Bcoz babies dont know language. Or, can you think in a diff language which you dont know? A beautiful analogy to understand is we all think we are waves in the sea (waves- memories,thoughts) but in reality waves dont exist…water is the reality….in the same way..I am consiouness. You are consiouness. There is no division.
The ship isn’t having an existential crisis in identity. It’s just dead trees that have Zero awareness. A better thought experiment would be to use a living thing. All living things, including us talking apes. Replace every single atom of our body (FIVE) times every single year. Now we have the same thoughts and experiences as before, just not the same body. Now answer the question, are we sill the same. And my answer is Yes and you still own me that $50
Somehow i am more focused one the consciousness, in relation to the question who am I. I personally believe that the one which is so called, the soul is actually the consciousness. When we die, even though our body is still there, decaying over time, we are considered to be non existent. Because the consciousness is no longer contained in the body. So I am not my mind, instead, I am my consciousness. And my consciousness cannot exist without my brain which is now functioning because it is alive and healthy. Consciousness somehow is related to memories stored in the brain. These memories complement one another in such a way that it forms a kind of web spun by the processing ability of the brain. Meaning, if we somehow still have the brain functioning, but the memories are sort of erased, our consciousness is compromised, and in that case, i dont know who I am. From a different point of view, people who know us may see me as myself from the outside, but when they realise that there is something different from me due to the memory loss, they might feel that it is not me inside. I become a stranger to them as they are to me. So In short, I am my consciousness.
The historian Plutarch explained the discovery of the self using the story of the ship, it all started with the ship of Theseus docked in Athens that explains no matter what changes or replaced with the same material on tha ship yet it is still tha ship that Theseus set his foot or the presence of Theseus. Just like in real life even though you take plastic surgery on your face it still you that everybody knows.
Advaita Vedanta answers the question: I am That, you are That, the entire universe is That Absolute Pure Consciousness. However, this realization is not in the realm of epistemology (relative knowledge subject to reason). One must have a new Awakening of an ontological nature that transcends the mind and duality altogether, to realize the “Oneness” that Plotinus spoke of, and that is the same as Aristotle’s “Being-In-Itself”. (Also, the Tao & Spinoza’s Substance).
deep inside everybody knows who they are, problem arises when they try to put it in words. I am that which cannot be touched, seen, broken, burned, spoken about, explained, viewed, or put in words. I can only be experienced, I am not bound by time, space, etc etc. I t might sound very narcissistic but it is not, I am not denying anybody else’s existence or important. Everyone is their own “i”. YOU DO NOT NEED TO WORRY ABOUT WHO YOU ARE BECAUSE YOU ALREADY KNOW WHO YOU ARE, YOU NEED TO BE WORRIED ABOUT WHO YOU ARE NOT.
This is my thought long ago, our cells, thoughts everything changes, So which one is real. Another if we bring plank time concept then, every plank time there is one me exist, so there maybe uncountable of me exist but which one is me actually? If we say its consciousness, how can you assure that your previous consciousness has deleted and present one is new but because of your previous memory is same you can’t recognize it. Someone may argue that, Okay then the memory, But if I place it into same functional brain or hardware like brain(hypothetically) then we and the artificial one will feel they both are me. So memory also isn’t Thats why I think. The “I” Me are just Illusion like. Or Concept which made up by our normal days thinking. (Like, people don’t usually know time is relative, from an ordinary perspective its unrealistic. But in real its true, which we had to figure it out.)
Found an answer of my own in January. Since I can’t assume a soul exists (even if it did why would it be except from change?), since each and every body part like everything else in the world never remains the same (you can’t step into the same river twice), that would mean that there is no persisting “I” or “me”, and I’d argue that perception is nothing but an illusion. Of course, we don’t know, me neither. But it’s plausible that we die as we change and cells are replaced, and that the new biological machine just tells itself otherwise. If there’s something to take away from this, there are a lot of things we assume as a given; going “that’s how it is, how could it be otherwise silly?”, but questioning that status quo is when interesting stuff starts to happen This can also be viewed in a positive light if preferred. Well, it’s only my thoughts since two months back so we’ll see how long I’ll stick with it. Cheerio
Saw something similar If you are decapitated and you watched your body grow another identical head Is that new person you?? Do you the experiencer of this ending life also get to witness that life? Is our body just a sum of parts & genetic material which can be recreated at some point Or there is an independent(probably non physical) unit in you that makes you you?
There is no individual me. There is no separation between me and the world. There is this world and I am part of the world. I i.e. identity is an artificial construct. (Since the brain is thinking who am I and it is connected to the body that is connected to the world, the properties of all of it and it’s interactions constitute I. Sometimes society tells me who I am.) ( If you think you are a fixed individual separate from the world, then use the logic,” whatever I collect with time, that can be mine but that can’t be me”. Now find who you are. You can use the method of नेति- नेति i.e. I am not this, I am not that. Then you will find there is no you. Then self- realisation & enlightenment). Look this is one of the paths I took to find the Truth, to this date I haven’t found anything that contradicts it or anything else that explains better (If you’re thinking about soul, then I or anyone or any instruments have never experienced/detected it. Different cultures/religions have different ideas about the soul/आत्मा. Also think about, if in technologically advanced future there are two persons whose brains are completely connected to the point they are one OR even today in case of joint children, then are there multiple souls in it or is there only one soul?, at what point there will be only one soul and at what point there will be multiple souls? Whose soul is in whose body & where); but I might be wrong. I would like you to go on your own quest and you should. Afterall isn’t this the most important question of our lives.
Part of my family Is Native American and part of them are white. Native Americans have to prove the validity of their claims that they are native Through a thing called blood quantum. If your father is full native, mother is full white, that means you are half native as an example. Some tribes have higher blood quantum minimums to be considered a tribe member or indigenous. Some tribes put more emphasis on family tree/descendants than blood quantum . I have a low blood quantum, but grew up with the culture of my tribe. Sometimes I have an identity crisis because I look white and mostly am genetically. Sometimes I wonder if I’m allowed to participate in my culture because I’m not “enough”. But then I contemplate on the the physical and metaphysical world with thought experiments like this. Creator never created a world that is physically permament. If we base native identity on the physical appearance and genetics, one day we will all be gone. Because the physical nature of our world is to change. We are what we are through spirit, which can be expressed through values, culture, ect. So people can call me a Cherokee princess if they want(a term used to poke fun at whites supposedly “trying” to be native), but my identity is far more metaphysical than what can be seen with the eyes. Miigwetch!
All these are basic things actually, Meditation and yoga, Chakra System are from Hinduism. Things greater or beyond than words. Try it even if you’re from another religion. Advaita Vedanta is very deep. Go slow and then you’ll catchup. Some businesses are looting you by showing basic things as the ultimate, Hinduism (Sanatana Dharma) has better to offer to the world.
what i think to the ship of theseus theory is, the parts that were changed and the new parts are like experiences in life, everytime we go through something it will not end up the same, but would give different results and thus the old experience changes and are being replaced by the newer experience.
There are three you(s) in existence. Who you are what you are today and how you are viewed by others. If the last two is not aligned to the first you,you are most likely lost. Hence the famous line …. Know thyself. But who are you? You are not a male or female.an Indian or African.a Muslim or Hindu You are a human being. But we are not being human when who I am is not connected to the what I am today and how you are viewed Seek first the kingdom and all things will be added to thee. But how do you find this internal kingdom? This is really a journey from you head to your heart And it is your most important journey in this life. I am is present, it is consciousness it is self awareness it is an enlightened state. It is being human and being who you are. Enjoy the journey!
I think the answer is simple. I am definitely not my skin, not my hair, and I am not my bone marrow because it grows very quickly and changes completely every period of time and I am still me. But my brain does not change, it remains the same, but it grows and develops and forms the memory. So I am consciousness connected to memories stored inside my brain. The brain is the only organ in the body that cannot be replaced. And it is the only organ that is a memory. With immunity, of course
Idiots just don’t understand that ‘Ship of Thesius’ as a whole does not exist. Its a virtual level of reality that is the ship. Whereas true reality, its just a collection of matter. Coming to the human side, the you in who am i is yet again a level of almost virtual reality wherein matter has taken on an animated form and has developed senses to be aware of itself. So you are the awareness that knows of your very being. Physiologically you are an output of your neurological system, but a derivative of it. There, you have your answer.
What defines our identity? Is it our physical appearance, personalities or memories? If physical appearance defines us, then if our body got damaged it will not be ourselves? If personalities defines us, then if we have gained another personality and forgot our previous personality we will not be ourselves? If memories defines us, then every second we’re not ourselves? If we lose our memory, is it us or someone else?
Who- an eternal being who’s not alternates during the years (but can be raised or lowered according to the paths i choose) Am- above the concept of time which is a creation of God just as everything in this world. I – a sole- a piece of God who can’t be seen with a flesh eyes, and resting inside a flesh body which it’s job is to allow her to be able to act and live in this material world. her job is to not ignore her creator, and live life as he told the world when he reveled himself to the sons of Israel exactly 3333 years ago, and gave us the manual to life here. that, despite the temptations and the natural attraction of the body to the earthy stuff. and by that I’ll get from God to elevate and to live a good and happy life seeing God’s help in this world and to collect my real unimaginable price in the eternal world. and so can you💚 so help us God