The Common Core (CC) initiative has been a significant factor in fostering creativity and innovation in students. It emphasizes critical thinking, logic, research, and mathematical thinking, which can be crucial for creative thinking and innovation. Four pathways through which the CC could influence student outcomes include instructional changes aligned with content standards, changes to curricula, heightened expectations for students or Pygmalion effects, and the implementation of high-impact practices.
Creativity and critical thinking are essential skills in the 21st century, and they can be fostered in classrooms that encourage creativity. However, the Common Core State Standards set a high bar for student learning and critical thinking, but they are not a cure-all for education. Anxiety, fear of risk or failure, and self-consciousness about one’s own thinking can often hinder classroom creativity, but they can open up possibilities.
To encourage creative thinking, teachers can experiment with “possibility thinking”, provide opportunities to explore individual interests, and emphasize analytical thinking, such as close reading of complex text, writing argumentation and explanation, and academic vocabulary. The goal of Common Core is to help students understand that numbers and math are flexible places where creativity is possible, independent of the teacher-student relationship.
However, many fear that rigorous content standards will impede efforts to nurture creativity in students. However, the Common Core and creativity offer each other far more than just a set of standards. By adjusting the teacher-student relationship, changing how math is taught, and introducing high-impact practices, educators can foster creativity and innovation in their students.
📹 What is Critical Thinking?
Critical Thinking encompasses six vital skills: problem solving, analysis, creative thinking, interpretation, evaluation, and …
What are three factors that affect creativity among students?
The capacity for creativity is enhanced by openness to new experiences, depth of knowledge in a field, and a diverse range of skills. These factors provide a robust foundation for the generation of novel ideas and encourage innovative thinking across a spectrum of domains.
How does the education system affect creativity?
The school system’s emphasis on test scores and rote learning can hinder innovative thinking and risk-taking. Mistakes and risk-taking are stigmatized, leading to a lack of self-expression and problem-solving opportunities. These characteristics contribute to an educational culture that prioritizes conformity and knowledge acquisition over the development of critical thinking and problem-solving abilities. Therefore, fostering creativity in education can have negative consequences. Therefore, it is crucial to address these issues to foster a more creative and innovative learning environment.
What is the benefit of Common Core?
The Common Core Curriculum improves classroom engagement by replacing traditional methods of repetition and memorization with more engaging and effective techniques. The objective is to facilitate the acquisition of competencies that enable students to advance to the subsequent grade level. The curriculum is designed to be collaborative, allowing for modifications or refinements based on the specific needs of the student or the educator.
What is the barrier to creativity in education?
The study found that barriers such as lack of time and opportunities, inhibition, shyness, and lack of motivation significantly affect creativity in participants. Social repression was reported to be affecting creativity to a lesser degree. Creativity is considered a fundamental life skill that needs to be nurtured through education to prepare future adults for a complex and uncertain world. In recent decades, educational policies worldwide have included the development of creative thinking as a fundamental objective of formal education. In school settings, various inter- and extra-curricular educational interventions have been proposed to cultivate the creative abilities of young children and adolescents.
Some learning and pedagogical environments have been suggested to facilitate and encourage creativity to a higher degree. In Greece, creativity development has been recognized as a curriculum objective, but specific educational policies for promoting creativity have scarcely been implemented. The extent to which creative thinking is practically promoted and encouraged in the classroom remains unclear and doubtful.
Research has focused on identifying, understanding, and removing potential inhibitors of children’s and adolescents’ creativity. Barriers such as self-perceptions, motivation, lack of opportunities, leisure, and social repression have been reported as the principal and most common barriers. The influence of these factors may explain the variation of creativity between and within individuals to a large extent.
How does Common Core affect student learning?
The progress of aligning curricula, instructional materials, and local assessments with the Smarter Balanced Assessments (SBAC) standards in California is uneven. 75% of respondents have aligned their curricula, instructional materials, and local assessments with the standards, with English being the most common. However, 30% have not started, and the share is higher among rural high schools. Most districts implemented the standards recently, with local adoption often occurring in phases.
Instructional practices lag behind, and most teachers have not fully aligned their classroom instruction with the new standards. On average, more progress has been made among English teachers than math teachers. Districts that adopted the standards saw modest improvements among elementary and middle school students, with a 2-3% increase in the share of students at or above English proficiency on SBAC.
However, the impact of the standards in high schools is inconclusive, with no overall effect on graduation rates, Advanced Placement courses, SAT exams, or “a-g” courses required by California’s four-year public universities.
What is the connection between creativity and independence?
Creativity in early childhood is crucial for children’s cognitive development, emotional growth, and social development. It allows children to express their thoughts and emotions, think creatively, and develop unique ideas. This fosters independence, confidence, and a sense of self-expression. Creative activities like art, music, and imaginative play help children communicate their emotions effectively, fostering empathy and understanding. They also encourage collaboration and communication among peers, fostering positive social relationships.
The benefits of creativity in early childhood include the ability to think outside the box, problem-solve, and develop unique ideas. Practical strategies for creative expression are essential for children to develop their emotional intelligence. Overall, creativity plays a vital role in fostering a healthy and creative environment for children.
Why are people against Common Core?
The Common Core education system is biased towards non-fiction reading and fiction, which can undermine students’ imagination. Students must adhere to American standards of education, including following the Common Curriculum and participating in sports. Full-time school attendance is mandatory Monday to Friday, with parent and child drop off and security scans. Students should focus on English, Reading, Writing, Math, Science, Music, Reading, Writing, Physical Exercise, Outside Games, Sports, History, Juvenile Delinquent holding cell, solitary, and second lunch.
Vegan, vegetarian, and pescatarian diets are not beneficial for students’ brain performance. They need carbohydrates, meat, cheese, and vegetables like corn, carrots, broccoli, sweet peppers, mushrooms, and spinach with garlic. Students should also consume carbohydrates, meat, cheese, and vegetables to stay full and optimally perform their brain.
Does the Common Core promote creativity?
The Common Core, which emphasizes critical thinking, logic, research, and mathematical thinking, can support creative thinking and innovation. However, under pressure to improve test scores, schools and teachers may focus solely on these standards, losing other aspects in the race for accountability. The standards do not cover all possible teaching methods, leaving much to the discretion of teachers and curriculum developers. The aim is to articulate the fundamentals, not to set out an exhaustive list or restrictions that limit what can be taught beyond what is specified.
What are the disadvantages of the Common Core standards?
The Common Core Standards (CCS) are a controversial topic in educational systems across the country, often misunderstood by teachers responsible for implementing them. The CCSS was developed in 2009 to standardize educational proficiency definitions among states. The development process included English-language arts and mathematics, occurring in two stages. The college- and career-readiness standards were developed first, and later integrated into the K-12 standards to form the final version of the CCSS.
Decisions to adopt the finalized CCSS occur through a state-by-state voluntary process, usually by state school boards, but occasionally by the state superintendent of education, State Legislature, or governor. Currently, 44 states, the District of Columbia, four territories, and the Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA) have adopted the CCSS and are implementing them according to their own schedules. The state standards site provides specific information about the current status of adoption for each state.
Why is Common Core bad for special education students?
Teachers face challenges in implementing Common Core-aligned assessments, which are one-size-fits-all and fail to cater to the instructional needs of every student. This is particularly problematic for students with disabilities, who require more time to learn due to cognitive impairments and the speed of adaptive technologies. CCSS prescribes grade-level standards, but special education students often fall behind, widening the achievement gap.
To address this issue, several groups are adapting Common Core assessments for students with disabilities. These groups can use adaptive assessment technologies, adapt questioning methods, or limit information programs to suit cognitive abilities. Additionally, educators and parents are advocating for alternative standardized assessments that consider different learning styles, needs, and cultural and economic backgrounds. Organizations like the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) and American College Testing (ACT) are developing assessments to cater to a wider range of students.
What is the relationship between creativity and child development?
Creativity is a crucial component of a child’s learning journey, fostering problem-solving, motor skills, curiosity, and imagination. It supports mental growth through challenges like equality, balance, and spatial relationships, and develops key skills like sensory perception, verbal skills, and hand-eye coordination. Creativity also promotes divergent thinking through reflection, wonder, and curiosity. It provides opportunities for experimentation, imagination, and freedom of expression, shaping social skills through diverse perspectives and understanding others’ needs.
📹 This tool will help improve your critical thinking – Erick Wilberding
Explore the technique known as the Socratic Method, which uses questions to examine a person’s values, principles, and beliefs.
Text: Critical thinking is all about asking questions. The right questions. Questions that help you assess both the meaning and the significance of claims and arguments. Building these skills and applying them in your life makes it easier for you to assess evidence, evaluate arguments and adapt your thinking and stay switched on and engaged in different situations. Critical thinking involves stepping back from a situation to enable you to see all the angles before making judgements or making decisions. It means identifying the key points, analysing the source of information, weighing up different types of evidence, just as a judge and jury would do in a court of law and putting it all together into your own independent, thought through point of view. One thing that’s very important to realise is that critical thinking isn’t about being critical and it’s about much more than finding flaws in other people’s claims. By itself, that isnt enough to give you an edge. To be a true critical thinker means being creative, reflective and adaptable. Evaluating the evidence to decide for yourself what is accurate, what is relevant, and do I have sufficient info to make a decision on this topic. Thinking critically means taking a stand for yourself. It can be difficult not to be swayed by close family and friend’s views on things, or certain beliefs that just…feel right. But learning how to use these higher order thinking skills can help you feel more confident on your own opinions and conclusions.
Critical Thinking :- Asking Right Questions Critical Thinking:- perusal A Situation In All The Angles before giving judgement, it helps to see key points Critical Thinking :- Critical Thinking Isn’t About Being Critical, It’s About Finding Flaws In Other’s Claims and it isn’t an edge Critical Thinking :- critical thinker means being creative, reflective, adaptable & Evaluating evidence to decide a accurate Critical Thinking :- Standing For Yourself what is right in your family and friends situation Critical Thinking :- a sense of discovery, excitement & not only about learning but also evaluating arguments to see how they stand up and filtering for yourself what resonates is right, wrong By Using These Techniques You’ll Find Yourself Becoming A Clear&Better Thinker
I really am impressed with this course, these skills most defiantly need to be taught in grade school to college. this skill trains society to function properly and respectfully to solve problems accurately by using facts to come to answer instead of rouge feelings and ignorance to make a final decision . Truly wish i had taken this class a long time ago!
Critical Thinking is all about questions. Creativity, adaptivity and the ability to embrace relevant information. In all circumstances think things through and developing a planned process will save time and energy. I don’t think any business likes time wasted. Sometimes in certain cases it may be better to take a step back and asses from different view-points.
Transcript: Critical thinking is all about asking questions, the right questions. Questions that help you assess both the meaning and the significance of claims and arguments. Building these skills and applying them in your life makes it easier for you to assess evidence, evaluate arguments, and adapt your thinking so you stay switched on and engaged in different situations. Critical thinking involves stepping back from a situation to enable you to see all of the angles before making judgments or taking decisions. It means identifying the key points, analyzing the sources of information, weighing up different types of evidence, just as a judge and jury would do in a court of law, and puting it all together into your own independent thought through point of view. One thing that it’s very important to realize is that critical thinking isn’t about being critical. And it’s about much more than just finding flaws in other people’s claims. By itself that isn’t enough to give you an edge. To be a true critical thinker means being creative, reflective, and adaptable. Evaluating the evidence to decide for yourself what is accurate, what is relevant, and do I have sufficient information to take a decision on this topic? Thinking critically means taking a stand for yourself. It can be difficult not to be swayed by close family or friend’s views on things or certain beliefs that just feel right, but learning how to use these higher-order thinking skills can help you to feel much more confident in your own opinions and conclusions.
I’m plugging my article “The Problem with Critical Thinking: tools for the moral antagonist” for anyone interested. Looking for opinions from critical thinkers and scholars. I don’t see much on this subject for the anarchist or conscientious objector. This is purely for intellectual achievement. Thank you.
I feel Critical Thinking should be renamed as ‘Logical Thinking’ or something. Despite your intro that says ‘critical thinking is not about being critical’, people at the workplace still feel repelled by the concept. If we want to introduce the concept in our daily ops, I’ve seen many who take it some sort of ultimatum that their work will be judged / criticized. It’s that psychology..
What resonates as right or wrong? Is not such a thing as right or wrong. From who’s point of you do we consider this? What happens to be perceived as wrong may be exactly what is necessary for change to happen. What about thinking of the natural stages of transformation and trying to find out what can make the situation or person further develop. What do you think about focusing on issues that bring new perspectives and a nuanced understanding.
Nobody highlights how scary it is to be a critical person, and what I mean is, when you step back to look to the big picture, investigate, question, evaluate, reflect, all that is such a hard and scary task. Knowing that there are no truths, just assumptions can bring a feeling of emptyness, all what we have are assumptions that at any time can be broken. For me, critical thinking is like being locked in a dark room with an unkown monster that seems to want to kill and tear me apart in to pieces, but in reallity, once becoming friends, he will will be my guide and mentor for life. Please, I want to be your friend but it’s so much easier to hide myself in my cave, ask someone to unlock the room, hide in my false troughts, why does it have to be that painfull. Please don’t open the door, but help me to become your friend.
Critical thinking skills are great. It’s great to be able to read a situation given the circumstances. However, if it’s someone like the Mighty God, no one is able to read Him. All the critical thinking skills fail when it comes to reading the mind of the Mighty God, so there are limits to the usefulness of critical thinking skills.
bruh, this skill has been mostly useless in my life such as an MCQ question in my exam asks why cant the sword do the work of a needle I selected the answer as the sword can’t do it because the sword is made of iron and will tear through the fabric you are trying to stitch. turns out the answer was needle does the stitching, not a sword. like wtf that is not critical reasoning and factual, you’re just providing the question in a statement form, it’s like saying why can’t water be used for making a milkshake and why can we only use milk, and the answer is milk is used for making a milkshake, not water. Like, provide a factual and critical fact when backing your argument. This is why schools are rigged.
You used a traffic accident as an example. That’s one place where it might be better not to weigh things out with a level head. If you say “Yeah, I guess you’re right. Looks like it was my fault.” your attorney will hate you. Don’t admit fault. Just exchange info and call the police if you feel it’s necessary but often that might not be the best way to go. It’s perfectly legal to work it out between yourselves. If you do call a cop or traffic investigator, your insurance rates could go up.
Started out well, but then rounded off with warm and fuzzy “let’s be positive” nonsense. Critical thinking is the result of studied and challenged conclusions. It is a necessary component for every facet of education. But it must be taught, and that by people who value the gift of reason and temperance over personal opinions and political positions. In other words, it doesn’t exist in public education!
Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance- Albert Einstein. I get so tired of lazy thinking and douches that think they have said topic figured out when they have no clue. Most people just follow their programming and have no original thoughts of their own. Now that I think of it (no pun intended), maybe I should cancel my reddit account after all.
This was BS. Seems to have a political agenda about how evaluation is interpreted. I;m still evaluating the website, but as someone who went to school for this, it stresses the now cultural benefit of “creativeness” more than the rigorousness of logic. It places the wrong emphasis at the wrong time. “Decide for yourself”? Um, no. Decide for the value which has the evidence provided? Yes. This article seems to advocate for some marginally thought out view of the world. Though logic may sometimes need to be superseded, 5,000 years of history has provided some reliable guideposts. This article seems to say, “take you best shot” ( a gut reaction).
Might I add: don’t wait for someone else to ask you questions about why you believe something. Ask yourself where it’s coming from first, no matter what it is you believe, no matter how uncomfortable it may be to question it. You cannot effectively defend your belief from someone else unless you are able to defend it from yourself. “I believe this.” “Why do I believe this?” “Because X.” “But why X?” “Because Y.” “But where did Y come from?” Etc, etc, until you reach the core of it. Or you find a dead end, or it starts to circle. A belief should not defend itself using itself. A belief should stand like a tower, with a clear line of logic based on something that cannot be shaken. Utilizing this method is a very good way to quickly gain a better understanding of yourself and the world around you.
I’m a medical student, and I just realised that a lot of my lecturers use this method when teaching us. I’ve had really bad ones who completely shut down every answer if it’s not the “right” one, and make you feel absolutely useless. And thankfully had really good ones, who made you question why is this method used, why not the other, and these lecturers even admit that there is no one right answer to a problem.
I love how at 4:10 the narrator specifically points out that its success is very dependant on how the teacher uses the technique and that’s actually very true. If teachers themselves dissuade you from asking too many questions there’s a good chance that you would start restricting your curiosity. I know it can be annoying in a class of 20-30 students for each one to ask so many questions. But instead of flat out stopping a child from asking it can be redirected at the least if nott answered immediately. That’s solely my pov though
I often use this with my biology students to get them to learn how to design and interpret experiments. It’s difficult for them to wrap their heads around at first because the vast majority of schooling relies on memorization, not understanding. I aim to help my students break down biases in experimentation and help them think in a way that can assist them even in normal life. By the end of the semester, there are usually a few who begin to understand. It’s always satisfying to know I’ve trained students who will go on to think about things based on logic.
One key aspect of this method that, unfortunately, isn’t mentioned in the article is that it gets the other person to reach their own conclusion which can be much more effective in getting them to believe it rather than being opposed to an idea simply because it is explicitly stated to them, in lecture form, by another.
This logic still holds true tremendously and is proved again and again thru methodological psychological studies. I recently read an article on how to talk to an irrationally rigid person out of a rigid opinion. And that was by asking him critical questions back on what he claims to be the answers instead of telling him what you think is the answer.
Thought I already had a tool for critical thinking “Ted Ed” 💕 Edit: Btw just to clarify: Socrates did not oppose democracy, he reasoned that everyone getting a vote when they have no social responsibility or social awareness is dangerous. He reasoned this with a scenario to another leading thinker of his time. He later reasoned that the present structure is not democracy but demagogue. He loved the idea of democracy but to give the right to vote to anyone and everyone who don’t even care just for the sake of it, was something he was against. And we are experiencing it’s effects aren’t we?
are historians always telling the truth? why is it whenever a reference/ source used just like in this article “many historians believed,” it appears to the audience as factual? but is it indeed the truth? sometimes this serves as a back up to make one’s argument/ statement true but the audience didn’t always know what is the 100% truth of the narrative.
The consequence of that though is that if you become too well-versed in it, you become plagued with indecision. Every action seems to be the wrong action, unable to move forward, stuck in an indefinite deadlock with yourself. It’s from Socratic Method I came up with the phrase “it’s not about right vs wrong, it’s about definitely wrong vs less wrong- which is determined by which (relevant) factors are taken into account and which ones are not.” But that pretty much says there’s no such thing as “right”, which is a rather unpopular view. People don’t like centrism, they claim it helps the oppressors by allowing them to act unchallenged while doing nothing for the oppressed. But how does one know which side is the oppressive side? Both sides seem to think the other side is. It’s a lose-lose, damned if you do, damned if you don’t.
It is by asking questions that you are able to gain a better understanding of where the person is coming from. As we all experience situations different, it is helpful to learn how others think and come to their response. That is what I try to do with my writings, by telling a story that is designed to make people think and feel. Hopefully they start to examine their life and the actions of others.
@NoteGPT Summary This article discusses how Socrates used questioning to challenge assumptions and help others develop stronger understanding, highlighting its applications in various fields such as medicine, astronomy, and law. Highlights Socrates was known for asking questions rather than providing clear answers. His method of questioning helped uncover assumptions and challenge biases. The Socratic method was used in fields such as medicine, astronomy, and law. It was adapted to address questions of faith after the Protestant Reformation. In the 19th century, it became an essential part of legal education in the United States. Keywords Socrates, questioning, assumptions, biases, Socratic method, medicine, astronomy, law, faith, legal education
The Socrates method :- Socrates was inquisitive about his perception of the world . He doubted all the ideologies that he had and dug deeper into understanding the world. He described the best way to learn something is by doubting all the aspects of knowledge that you have regarding the subject. The more you question it, the more precise your thoughts will get and will result in more and more questions and may end up in neat conclusions. Teachers and professors are advised to act humble and not show their superior complex to the pupils who are present for gaining insights in the topic. Let them question and find the answers by themselves. Questioning instigates our mind to develop newer path of perceiving the reality.
Every argument, understanding or opinion is ridden in certain assumptions, and that are essential to make, because not every factors can be taken into consideration. Hence, journey to take all factors is done through asking questions, which makes an individual rethink those assumption. Assumption are born out of limited knowledge on a being, could also be ridden in privileges, experiences, etc.
There is no human being who is unbiased. Even if you think you are the most neutral unbiased person on earth regarding a situation or anything, YOU ARE NOT! Consciously or Sub-consciously. The Socratic tutor or the philosopher who is supposed to ask questions out of curiosity isn’t neutral either. Somehow he’ll try to pass his beliefs or ideas thorough the patterns of his hypothetical questions.
One of the great failures of machine learning large language models such as chatgpt is that they are incapable of reasoning, and cannot make accurate predictions even when questions are asked that invalidate all their previous assumptions. Given a logically sound series of arguments, LLM’s will keep regurgitating the same falsehoods brought about by their training data. AI is incapable of responding to socrates’ method.
There is a delightful story about Socrates : a man came to Socrates to tell him about one of his friends behavior. Socrates asked him : – Is it true ? – I don’t know. Someone told it to me. – Is it something good ? -I don’t think so. Rather the opposite. – Is it something useful ? – Not really … – So, if what you want to tell me about this friend isn’t true, isn’t good and isn’t even useful, I don’t want to know it.
My family always point out how I complicate problems and never find answers. Apparently there’s a term for that, “Socratic Method” lmaoo I do think that this type of thinking does hamper your social life though, you will become less of a likeable/agreeable person if you think like this and you’ll have less friends. Trust me I know from experience.
Ancient India was ‘Land of Seekers’, people asking question and searching for answers. There would be ‘Shashtrarths’ among people. Disciples would openly disagree with their gurus. Now, the more I read about Greek Philosophers, the more I admire them. I guess the era before advent of Abrahamic Religions, or rather the concept of One Book, One God, One Prophet has tremendously hampered the human civilization. And these One Book, One God, One Prophet philosophies have been ruthless, proselytizing & Barbaric in dealing with people of other faiths.
hello,i’m interested on translating TED-ED articles to Indonesian.By the way,I’m a highschooler student,I have a lot of spare time and want to fill it with useful things.I am fluent both in English and Indonesian,also my local languages,Javanese.I heard that TED is moving from Amara to Captionhub,so where I should apply?Thank you^^!
As far as the example of a commander lying to his army by boosting its morale is concerned it doesn’t prove whether lying is good in a particular situation, it just a way to win the argument and will not dictate the society that they should consider lying once in a while as lying would remained a bad thing from the morality standards which can be altered,( as in this case) suspended but can’t be obliterated from the human society and replace by a new moral principle as stated above. The argument can be used for making fornication and cannibalism acceptable once in a while but we know it has never been a normal behavior under moral principle even though lately some segments of the society ties fornication to human nature by declaring it as basic human right and again it will never change the basic moral principle that these two attributes are not normal regardless of what society chose.
The Socratic Method: Question-Based: Uses questions to stimulate critical thinking. Explores Beliefs: Examines and challenges values, principles, and beliefs. Deep Thinking: Encourages thorough analysis and self-reflection. Dialogical: Involves a dialogue between the questioner and respondent. Educational Tool: Develops critical thinking and deeper understanding in educational settings.
🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:08 📜 Socrates’ method of engaging in conversations about morality and society – Socrates, known for asking probing questions rather than lecturing, engaged in conversations to explore moral and societal questions. – His method revealed flaws in logic, leading to a deeper understanding of issues. 02:06 🤔 Socratic Method’s application beyond philosophy – Socrates described his questioning as a form of intellectual midwifery, helping others give birth to their ideas. – This method clarifies questions and challenges assumptions without necessarily providing definitive answers. 03:04 🎓 The Socratic Method’s influence across various fields and eras – Its versatility has made it useful in fields like medicine, science, and law across different historical periods. – The method fosters critical reasoning and has been adapted for education in various subjects. 04:02 📚 Qualities of an effective Socratic educator – Effective Socratic educators are knowledgeable, modest, and genuinely curious, encouraging student participation. – The success of the Socratic Method in teaching depends largely on the teacher’s approach and understanding of the subject matter. Made with HARPA AI
Excelent article in general. There’s, however, pehaps too much certainty placed at some point (and, weirdly, even emphasis) on the Socratic dialogues being “fictional”, “invented” and/or “fabricated” (!!) considering that this is mere congecture. It’s not inconceivable that all dialogues might have been fully “fictional”/”invented”/”fabricated” by their authors, but nor is there certainty that this is indeed the case. To resolve this is even a thing, called the Socratic problem.