“A Rose for Emily” is a short story by William Faulkner, set in the South. The title of the story highlights its importance and the multiple meanings of the word “rose”. The story explores conflicts, physical, moral, intellectual, and emotional, as well as the town’s unwillingness to confront Emily about her house’s smell.
The term “noblesse oblige” is used to describe the events that cause some townspeople to say “Poor”. Colonel Sartoris excuses Emily from paying taxes, and the townspeople are unwilling to confront her about the smell coming from her house. A gray hair is found on the bed after Emily’s death, and the story explores the concept of noblesse oblige.
The town’s inhabitants are hesitant to confront Emily about the smell, and the term “noblesse oblige” is used to describe the Grierson family. The house and furnishings suggest that the Grierson family was a disturbed and unconventional group. Colonel Satoris remits Miss Emily’s taxes, and Judge Stevens doesn’t want to confront her about the smell.
The rose serves as an important symbol in the story, as Emily always desired true love. The aldermen visit Miss Emily’s house to discuss her languishing tax. Faulkner begins the story at Emily’s funeral, and the townspeople come to Emily’s funeral to discuss her situation.
In summary, “A Rose for Emily” is a captivating story that explores themes of love, conflict, and the complexities of human relationships. By studying the story with Quizlet and Quizlet, readers can enhance their understanding and support their answers with evidence from the story.
📹 A Rose for Emily by William Faulkner | Summary & Analysis
Professor Bill Yarrow of Joliet Junior College provides an in-depth analysis of the plot, characters, symbols, and themes of William …
📹 A Rose for Emily: Literary Analysis – Essay Example
Essay description: This literary analysis essay focuses on A Rose for Emily – a short story by William Faulkner. It provides a …
In the context of the story, Homer Barron is not homosexual. In the story it says, “Homer himself had remarked—he liked men, and it was known that he drank with the younger men in the Elks’ Club—that he was not a marrying man.” The story is not implying that he is homosexual, but rather saying he does not want to be in a marital relationship with someone. This implies that he likes the bachelor lifestyle. When I first read the story, I too thought he was homosexual, but with a closer look I do not believe that is what Faulkner was portraying. He would not bring up that Homer was not a marrying man if he was homosexual, because if he was homosexual it would not matter if he was a marrying man or not since Emily is a woman. I believe Homer, as many men do, just appreciates time with the boys! But who’s to say it doesn’t become a deeper bromance at times, lol! Maybe he is homosexual, you never know. Either way, it’s a good story 😜
The text suggests he was homosexual? Rubbish! The text says nothing of the sort. Those who insist that Homer Barron is gay hang their entire case upon the narrator’s claim that Homer “likes men” and that he is not “a marrying man.” These throw away phrases are used to paint Homer as a “man’s man”, a ne’er do well reconteur, who’d rather spend his time drinking & carousing with the boys, than stay at home with a wife & family. If Faulkner wanted a gay Homer in his story, he wouldn’t have pussyfooted around it.